Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without live bacterial supplementation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 1 trialPrevious studies have suggested that the gut microbiome influences the response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients with cancer. CBM588 is a bifidogenic live bacterial product that we postulated could augment CPI response through modulation of the gut microbiome. In this open-label, single-center study (NCT03829111), 30 treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with clear cell and/or sarcomatoid histology and intermediate- or poor-risk disease were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without daily oral CBM588, respectively. Stool metagenomic sequencing was performed at multiple timepoints. The primary endpoint to compare the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. at baseline and at 12 weeks was not met, and no significant differences in Bifidobacterium spp. or Shannon index associated with the addition of CBM588 to nivolumab-ipilimumab were detected. Secondary endpoints included response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving nivolumab-ipilimumab with CBM588 than without (12.7 months versus 2.5 months, hazard ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.47, P = 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the response rate was also higher in patients receiving CBM588 (58% versus 20%, P = 0.06). No significant difference in toxicity was observed between the study arms. The data suggest that CBM588 appears to enhance the clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab. Larger studies are warranted to confirm this clinical observation and elucidate the mechanism of action and the effects on microbiome and immune compartments.
Stool Microbiome Profiling of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Anti–PD-1 Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsCabozantinib in Combination with Immunotherapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma: Rationale and Clinical EvidencePaulo Gustavo Bergerot, Peter Lamb, Evelyn N. Wang et al.|Molecular Cancer Therapeutics|2019 The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has evolved rapidly in recent years with the approval of several checkpoint inhibitors. Despite these advances, survival rates for metastatic disease remain poor, and additional strategies will be needed to improve the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors. Combining anti-VEGF/VEGFR agents with checkpoint inhibitors has emerged as a potential strategy to advance the immunotherapy paradigm, because VEGF inhibitors have immunomodulatory potential. Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) whose targets include MET, AXL, and VEGFR2. Cabozantinib has a unique immunomodulatory profile and has demonstrated clinical efficacy as a monotherapy in mRCC and mUC, making it a potentially suitable partner for checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In this review, we summarize the current status of immunotherapy for mRCC and mUC and discuss the development of immunotherapy-TKI combinations, with a focus on cabozantinib. We discuss the rationale for such combinations based on our growing understanding of the tumor microenvironment, and we review in detail the preclinical and clinical studies supporting their use.
Responses to Alectinib in ALK-rearranged Papillary Renal Cell CarcinomaFear of Cancer Recurrence or Progression: What Is It and What Can We Do About It?Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Errol J. Philip, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot et al.|American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book|2022 Patients with cancer face a trajectory marked by emotional and physical distress that can be associated with both diagnosis and treatment. Fear of cancer recurrence or progression has been considered one of the most common unmet needs reported by patients diagnosed with both localized and metastatic disease. Fear of cancer recurrence or progression has been defined as the "fear, worry, or concern relating to the possibility that cancer will come back or progress." Often overlooked by health care teams, fear of cancer recurrence or progression has been associated with impaired quality of life and psychosocial adjustment, elevated emotional distress, and a range of physical symptoms. Several interventions for fear of cancer recurrence or progression are currently under investigation. Early recognition, support, and validation of feelings associated with fear of cancer recurrence or progression, and appropriate referrals to psychosocial oncology, can be beneficial for many patients. Assessing patients early in their cancer trajectory, and at important milestones, including a change in therapies, at the end of active treatment, and during follow-up visits, can help identify individuals at risk and help individuals engage in supportive programs.