Mark D. Miller

OBJECTIVE: The authors tested the hypothesis that nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy, alone and in combination, are superior to placebo in achieving remission of bereavement-related major depressive episodes. METHOD: Eighty subjects, aged 50 years and older, with major depressive episodes that began within 6 months before or 12 months after the loss of a spouse or significant other were randomly assigned to a 16-week doubleblind trial of one of four treatment conditions: nortriptyline plus interpersonal psychotherapy (N = 16), nortriptyline alone in a medication clinic (N = 25), placebo plus interpersonal psychotherapy (N = 17), or placebo alone in a medication clinic (N = 22). The protocol required that the acute-phase double-blind treatment be ended after 8 weeks if Hamilton depression scale ratings had not improved by 50%. Remission was defined as a 17-item Hamilton scale score of 7 or lower for 3 consecutive weeks. RESULTS: The rate of remission for nortriptyline plus interpersonal psychotherapy was 69% (N = 11); for medication clinic, nortriptyline, 56% (N = 14); for placebo plus interpersonal psychotherapy, 29% (N = 5); and for medication clinic, placebo, 45% (N = 10). In a generalized logit model, there was a significant effect of nortriptyline over placebo but no interpersonal psychotherapy effect and no nortriptyline-by-interpersonal psychotherapy interaction. Rates of all-cause attrition were lowest in the nortriptyline plus interpersonal psychotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Nortriptyline was superior to placebo in achieving remission of bereavement-related major depressive episodes. The combination of medication and psychotherapy was associated with the highest rate of treatment completion. These results support the use of pharmacologic treatment of major depressive episodes in the wake of a serious life stressor such as bereavement.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic knee dislocations that result in multiple-ligament knee injuries are unusual and are poorly studied. We are not aware of any prospective data regarding their treatment. Both the optimum timing of surgery for repair or reconstruction and the aggressiveness of rehabilitation are debated. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the outcomes of early, delayed, and staged procedures as well as the subsequent rehabilitation protocols. METHODS: We surveyed the literature and retrieved twenty-four retrospective studies, involving 396 knees, dealing with the surgical treatment of the most severe multiple-ligament knee injuries (those involving both cruciate ligaments and either or both collateral ligaments). Data were extracted, and surgical timing was categorized as acute, chronic, or staged. Early postoperative mobility and immobilization were also compared. RESULTS: We found that acute treatment was associated with residual anterior knee instability when compared with chronic treatment (odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.8; p = 0.018). Significantly more patients who were managed acutely were found to have more flexion deficits when compared with those who were managed chronically (odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 17.5; p = 0.004). Staged treatments yielded the highest percentage of excellent and good subjective outcomes (79%; 95% confidence interval, 62.2% to 89.3%). Additional treatment for joint stiffness was significantly more likely in association with acute treatment (17%; 95% confidence interval, 13.0% to 22.4%; p < 0.001) and staged treatment (15%; 95% confidence interval, 7.6% to 28.2%; p = 0.001) when each was compared with chronic treatment (0% [zero of seventy-one]; 95% confidence interval, 0.0% to 5.1%). Early mobility was not associated with increased joint instability in acutely managed patients. Early mobility yielded fewer range-of-motion deficits but did not reduce the rate of follow-up manipulation or arthrolysis. CONCLUSIONS: This review of the available literature suggests that delayed reconstructions of severe multiple-ligament knee injuries could potentially yield equivalent outcomes in terms of stability when compared with acute surgery. However, in the acutely managed patient, early mobility is associated with better outcomes in comparison with immobilization. Acute surgery is highly associated with range-of-motion deficits. Staged procedures may produce better subjective outcomes and a lower number of range-of-motion deficits but are still likely to require additional treatment for joint stiffness. More aggressive rehabilitation may prevent this from occurring in multiple-ligament knee injuries that are treated acutely.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments has become a popular surgical treatment for high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations, but little has been reported about complications related to these newer surgical techniques. PURPOSE: We sought to review the complications related to several new techniques for the anatomic reconstruction of the CC ligaments for the treatment of AC separations. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the operative treatment of AC separation utilizing anatomic reconstruction of the CC ligaments by reviewing the case logs of 3 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single academic sports medicine center for the past 5 years using appropriate current procedural terminology codes. The medical records and postoperative radiographs were assessed for complications. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cases of anatomic reconstruction of the CC ligaments were reviewed. All patients had an autograft or allograft ligament reconstruction utilizing either a coracoid tunnel (10 cases) or a loop around the coracoid base (17 cases). Eight complications (80%) were noted in the coracoid tunnel group including 2 coracoid fractures (20%), 5 patients with some loss of reduction (more than 5-mm increased CC interval displacement on subsequent postoperative radiographs) (50%), and 1 patient with an intraoperative failure of the coracoid button fixation (10%). Six patients developed complications in the coracoid loop group (35%) including 3 clavicle fractures (18% within group, 11% overall), 1 patient with loss of reduction (6%), 1 patient with loss of reduction and an infection (6% within group, 4% overall), and 1 patient with adhesive capsulitis postoperatively (6% within group, 4% overall). CONCLUSION: Newer techniques for the anatomic reconstruction of the CC ligaments may have steep learning curves associated with complications such as coracoid and clavicle fractures. Loss of reduction continues to be associated with the operative treatment of high-grade AC separations. Further refinement of surgical technique and experience with the operative treatment of AC separation is warranted.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of MRI in determining both the extent and the location of injury to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). METHOD: MR findings were compared to the surgical results of 14 consecutive patients who experienced transient patellar dislocation. Two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to the surgical results, retrospectively reviewed the MR studies, and a consensus reading was obtained. RESULTS: Surgery demonstrated complete disruption of the MPFL in 7 of 14 patients (50%), with stretching or partial tearing of the MPFL in the remaining 7 (50%) patients. MRI was 85% sensitive and 70% accurate in detecting MPFL disruption. Vastus medialis obliquus muscle elevation was present in 12 of 14 (85%). CONCLUSION: MRI accurately depicts both the extent and the location of MPFL injury following transient patellar dislocation and can therefore play a significant role in directing surgical management of these patients.