A

Armando Gabrielli

Marche Polytechnic University

ORCID: 0000-0002-4509-8772

Publishes on Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases, Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis. 271 papers and 10.3k citations.

271Publications
10.3kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Scleroderma
Armando Gabrielli, Enrico V. Avvedimento, Thomas Krieg|New England Journal of Medicine|2009
Cited by 1.4k

This account of the mechanisms of scleroderma highlights the genetic and molecular changes that cause the vascular changes and fibrosis in the disease. The role of autoantibodies, of which there are several in scleroderma, is unclear. The authors outline a stepwise process that begins with inflammation, reaches its zenith in fibrosis, and ends in atrophy.

Stimulatory Autoantibodies to the PDGF Receptor in Systemic Sclerosis
Silvia Svegliati Baroni, Mariarosaria Santillo, Federica Bevilacqua et al.|New England Journal of Medicine|2006
Cited by 576Open Access

BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is characterized by immunologic abnormalities, injury of endothelial cells, and tissue fibrosis. Abnormal oxidative stress has been documented in scleroderma and linked to fibroblast activation. Since platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and since IgG from patients with scleroderma reacts with human fibroblasts, we tested the hypothesis that patients with scleroderma have serum autoantibodies that stimulate the PDGF receptor (PDGFR), activating collagen-gene expression. METHODS: We analyzed serum from 46 patients with scleroderma and 75 controls, including patients with other autoimmune diseases, for stimulatory autoantibodies to PDGFR by measuring the production of ROS produced by the incubation of purified IgG with mouse-embryo fibroblasts carrying inactive copies of PDGFR alpha or beta chains or the same cells expressing PDGFR alpha or beta. Generation of ROS was assayed with and without specific PDGFR inhibitors. Antibodies were characterized by immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, and absorption experiments. RESULTS: Stimulatory antibodies to the PDGFR were found in all the patients with scleroderma. The antibodies recognized native PDGFR, inducing tyrosine phosphorylation and ROS accumulation. Autoantibody activity was abolished by preincubation with cells expressing the PDGFR alpha chain or with recombinant PDGFR or by PDGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Stimulatory PDGFR antibodies selectively induced the Ha-Ras-ERK1/2 and ROS cascades and stimulated type I collagen-gene expression and myofibroblast phenotype conversion in normal human primary fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulatory autoantibodies against PDGFR appear to be a specific hallmark of scleroderma. Their biologic activity on fibroblasts strongly suggests that they have a causal role in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Effects and safety of rituximab in systemic sclerosis: an analysis from the European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) group
Suzana Jordan, Jörg H. W. Distler, Britta Maurer et al.|Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases|2014
Cited by 425Open Access

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of Rituximab (RTX) on skin and lung fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) belonging to the European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) cohort and using a nested case-control design. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were fulfilment of American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SSc, treatment with RTX and availability of follow-up data. RTX-treated patients were matched with control patients from the EUSTAR database not treated with RTX. Matching parameters for skin/lung fibrosis were the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), forced vital capacity (FVC), follow-up duration, scleroderma subtype, disease duration and immunosuppressive co-treatment. The primary analysis was mRSS change from baseline to follow-up in the RTX group compared with the control group. Secondary analyses included change of FVC and safety measures. RESULTS: 63 patients treated with RTX were included in the analysis. The case-control analysis in patients with severe diffuse SSc showed that mRSS changes were larger in the RTX group versus matched controls (N=25; -24.0±5.2% vs -7.7±4.3%; p=0.03). Moreover, in RTX-treated patients, the mean mRSS was significantly reduced at follow-up compared with baseline (26.6±1.4 vs 20.3±1.8; p=0.0001). In addition, in patients with interstitial lung disease, RTX prevented significantly the further decline of FVC compared with matched controls (N=9; 0.4±4.4% vs -7.7±3.6%; p=0.02). Safety measures showed a good profile consistent with previous studies in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of RTX treated versus untreated matched-control SSc patients from the EUSTAR cohort demonstrated improvement of skin fibrosis and prevention of worsening lung fibrosis, supporting the therapeutic concept of B cell inhibition in SSc.

A randomized controlled trial of rituximab for the treatment of severe cryoglobulinemic vasculitis
Salvatore De Vita, Luca Quartuccio, Miriam Isola et al.|Arthritis & Rheumatism|2011
Cited by 397Open Access

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a long-term, prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating rituximab (RTX) therapy for severe mixed cryoglobulinemia or cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV). METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with CV and related skin ulcers, active glomerulonephritis, or refractory peripheral neuropathy were enrolled. In CV patients who also had hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, treatment of the HCV infection with antiviral agents had previously failed or was not indicated. Patients were randomized to the non-RTX group (to receive conventional treatment, consisting of 1 of the following 3: glucocorticoids; azathioprine or cyclophosphamide; or plasmapheresis) or the RTX group (to receive 2 infusions of 1 gm each, with a lowering of the glucocorticoid dosage when possible, and with a second course of RTX at relapse). Patients in the non-RTX group who did not respond to treatment could be switched to the RTX group. Study duration was 24 months. RESULTS: Survival of treatment at 12 months (i.e., the proportion of patients who continued taking their initial therapy), the primary end point, was statistically higher in the RTX group (64.3% versus 3.5% [P < 0.0001]), as well as at 3 months (92.9% versus 13.8% [P < 0.0001]), 6 months (71.4% versus 3.5% [P < 0.0001]), and 24 months (60.7% versus 3.5% [P < 0.0001]). The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score decreased only after treatment with RTX (from a mean ± SD of 11.9 ± 5.4 at baseline to 7.1 ± 5.7 at month 2; P < 0.001) up to month 24 (4.4 ± 4.6; P < 0.0001). RTX appeared to be superior therapy for all 3 target organ manifestations, and it was as effective as conventional therapy. The median duration of response to RTX was 18 months. Overall, RTX treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: RTX monotherapy represents a very good option for severe CV and can be maintained over the long term in most patients.