The DNA damage response induces inflammation and senescence by inhibiting autophagy of GATA4Cellular senescence is a terminal stress-activated program controlled by the p53 and p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor proteins. A striking feature of senescence is the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), a pro-inflammatory response linked to tumor promotion and aging. We have identified the transcription factor GATA4 as a senescence and SASP regulator. GATA4 is stabilized in cells undergoing senescence and is required for the SASP. Normally, GATA4 is degraded by p62-mediated selective autophagy, but this regulation is suppressed during senescence, thereby stabilizing GATA4. GATA4 in turn activates the transcription factor NF-κB to initiate the SASP and facilitate senescence. GATA4 activation depends on the DNA damage response regulators ATM and ATR, but not on p53 or p16(INK4a). GATA4 accumulates in multiple tissues, including the aging brain, and could contribute to aging and its associated inflammation.
Profound Tissue Specificity in Proliferation Control Underlies Cancer Drivers and Aneuploidy PatternsA review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicidesAbstract The sulfonylurea herbicides are a relatively new group of compounds which control broad‐leaved weeds and some grasses in cereal crops. This literature review emphasises work reported on chlorsulfuron and met‐sulfuron‐methyl. The activity of the herbicides, their fate in soil and in plants, and their mode of action are discussed. In addition some of the methods of assaying these compounds are described.
The adaptive immune system is a major driver of selection for tumor suppressor gene inactivationDefining tumor cell immune evasion Mouse models used to study cancer often lack a full immune system, allowing implantation of human tumors into the mice. By contrast, naturally evolving tumors must contend with a fully functional immune system and its destruction of some of the cells (see the Perspective by Ho and Wood). Two groups now report studies on mouse models with a fully intact immune system. Martin et al . started with preexisting murine tumor cell lines and examined their continued evolution in vivo, whereas Del Poggetto et al . examined the development of new pancreatic tumors in the context of inflammation, as is often seen in human patients. In each study, the authors found that the immune system exerted a selective pressure on cells that would give rise to tumors, promoting the survival of those that had lost expression of tumor suppressor genes or activated a specific oncogene. The findings suggest a major role for the immune system in driving tumor evolution across multiple types of cancer. —YN
<i>KRAS/BRAF</i> mutation status and ERK1/2 activation as biomarkers for MEK1/2 inhibitor therapy in colorectal cancerJen Jen Yeh, Elizabeth D. Routh, Tara C. Rubinas et al.|Molecular Cancer Therapeutics|2009 Phase II clinical trials of mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK) inhibitors are ongoing and ERK1/2 activation is frequently used as a biomarker. In light of the mutational activation of BRAF and KRAS in colorectal cancer, inhibitors of the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase are anticipated to be promising. Previous studies in pancreatic cancer have found little correlation between BRAF/KRAS mutation status and ERK1/2 activation, suggesting that identifying biomarkers of MEK inhibitor response may be more challenging than previously thought. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MEK inhibitor therapy for colorectal cancer and BRAF/KRAS mutation status and ERK1/2 activation as biomarkers for MEK inhibitor therapy. First, we found that MEK inhibitor treatment impaired the anchorage-independent growth of nearly all KRAS/BRAF mutant, but not wild-type, colorectal cancer cells. There was a correlation between BRAF, but not KRAS, mutation status and ERK1/2 activation. Second, neither elevated ERK1/2 activation nor reduction of ERK1/2 activity correlated with MEK inhibition of anchorage-independent growth. Finally, we validated our cell line observations and found that ERK1/2 activation correlated with BRAF, but not KRAS, mutation status in 190 patient colorectal cancer tissues. Surprisingly, we also found that ERK activation was elevated in normal colonic epithelium, suggesting that normal cell toxicity may be a complication for colorectal cancer treatment. Our results suggest that although MEK inhibitors show promise in colorectal cancer, KRAS/BRAF mutation status, but not ERK activation as previously thought, may be useful biomarkers for MEK inhibitor sensitivity.