Elizabeth Nicolli

Importance: Unplanned hospital readmission is costly and in recent years has become a focus of health care legislation intended to reduce health care expenditures. Greater understanding of which perioperative complications are associated with hospital readmission after surgery for head and neck cancer is needed to reduce unplanned readmissions. Objective: To determine which clinical risk factors and complications are associated with 30-day unplanned readmission after surgery for malignant neoplasms of the head and neck. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective longitudinal claims analysis included data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014. Patients undergoing surgery for malignant tumors of the head and neck were included; those with a primary diagnosis of thyroid malignant disease and those undergoing free autologous tissue transfer were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical risk factors and complications were analyzed for association with unplanned hospital readmission using multivariable regression analysis. Statistical significance was determined using P < .05. Results: A total of 7605 patients (5007 men [65.8%]; mean [SD] age, 64.2 [0.2] years) were identified and included for analysis. Overall, 1472 complications occurred in 912 cases. Three hundred eighty-eight patients (5.1%) had an unplanned readmission, which was lower than the previously published overall readmission rate for noncardiac surgical procedures in the NSQIP (6.8%). Clinical factors that were independently associated with unplanned readmission were age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), diabetes (AOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.43), preoperative dyspnea at rest (AOR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.40-5.55) and with moderate exertion (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01-2.11), long-term use of corticosteroids (AOR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.63-3.58), disseminated cancer (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.20), and a contaminated wound (AOR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.05-3.7). When specific complications were examined, superficial incisional surgical site infection (SSI) (AOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.14-3.40), deep incisional SSI (AOR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.26-5.03), organ or space SSI (AOR, 13.27; 95% CI, 6.57-26.61), wound disruption (AOR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.95-6.31), pneumonia (AOR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.88-5.96), deep vein thrombosis (AOR, 5.60; 95% CI, 1.90-15.25), pulmonary embolism (AOR, 20.72; 95% CI, 7.86-55.68), urinary tract infection (AOR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.00-6.34), stroke (AOR, 12.42; 95% CI, 3.99-36.50), sepsis (AOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.27-5.30), and septic shock (AOR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.10-15.81) were all associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission. Conclusions and Relevance: This study evaluated clinical factors and postoperative complications to determine which ones were associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission among patients undergoing surgery for malignant tumors of the head and neck. Further understanding of which complications are associated with unplanned readmission after head and neck surgery will allow for improved risk stratification and development of postoperative care protocols to reduce unplanned hospital readmission.

Abstract Objective: The aetiology and outcomes for patients with acquired subglottic stenosis are highly variable. This study aimed to identify risk factors for subglottic stenosis and patient characteristics that predict long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 63 patients with subglottic stenosis and 63 age-matched controls. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were compared. Subglottic stenosis patients were further grouped according to tracheostomy status (i.e. tracheostomy never required, tracheostomy initially required but patient eventually decannulated, and tracheostomy-dependent). Patient factors from these three groups were then compared to evaluate risk factors for long-term tracheostomy dependence. Results: Compared to controls, patients with subglottic stenosis had a significantly higher body mass index (30.8 vs 26.0 kg/m 2 ; p &lt; 0.001) and were more likely to have diabetes (23.8 per cent vs 7.94 per cent; p = 0.01). Comparing tracheostomy outcomes within the subglottic stenosis group, body mass index trended towards significance ( p = 0.08). Age, gender, socio-economic status, subglottic stenosis aetiology and other co-morbidities did not correlate with outcome. Conclusion: Obesity and diabetes are significant risk factors for acquiring subglottic stenosis. Further investigations are required to determine if obesity is also a predictor for failed tracheostomy decannulation in subglottic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular free tissue transfer provides superior functional outcomes when reconstructing head and neck cancer defects. Careful patient selection and surgical planning is necessary to ensure success, as many preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative patient and technical factors may affect outcome. AIMS: To provide a concise, yet thorough, review of the current literature regarding free flap patient selection and management for the patient with head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases were queried for publications pertaining to free tissue transfer management and outcomes. RESULTS: Malnutrition and tobacco use are modifiable patient factors that negatively impact surgical outcomes. The use of postoperative antiplatelet medications and perioperative antibiotics for greater than 24 hours have not been shown to improve outcomes, although the use of clindamycin alone has been shown to have a higher risk of flap failure. Liberal blood transfusion should be avoided due to higher risk of wound infection and medical complications. DISCUSSION: There is a wide range of beliefs regarding proper management of patients undergoing free tissue transfer. While there is some data to support these practices, much of the data is conflicting and common practices are often continued out of habit or dogma. CONCLUSION: Free flap reconstruction remains a highly successful surgery overall despite as many different approaches to patient care as there are free flap surgeons. Close patient monitoring remains a cornerstone of surgical success.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised controversies regarding safe and effective care of patients with head and neck cancer. It is unknown how much the pandemic has changed surgeon practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to head and neck surgeons assessing opinions related to treatment and concerns for the safety of patients, self, family, and staff. RESULTS: A total of 88 head and neck surgeons responded during the study period. Surgeons continued to recommend primary surgical treatment for oral cavity cancers. Respondents were more likely to consider nonsurgical therapy for patients with early glottic cancers and HPV-mediated oropharynx cancer. Surgeons were least likely to be concerned for their own health and safety and had the greatest concern for their resident trainees. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights differences in the willingness of head and neck surgeons to delay surgery or alter plans during times when hospital resources are scarce and risk is high.