Cyclin D1 and prognosis in human breast cancerCheryl Gillett, Paul Smith, Walter M. Gregory et al.|International Journal of Cancer|1996 We have used immunohistochemical staining to assess the expression of cyclin D1 in formalin-fixed sections of 345 breast carcinomas, dating back 20 years. Clinical follow-up data were available on all patients. Approximately 50% of the tumours showed excessive nuclear staining for cyclin D1 as compared with normal epithelium. Some tumours showed strong cytoplasmic staining in the absence of nuclear staining, and around 25% of the tumours were judged to be negative for nuclear cyclin D1. Contrary to expectations, moderate/strong staining for cyclin D1 was associated with improved relapse-free and overall survival relative to patients whose tumours stained weakly or negatively. Conversely, tumours that were considered negative for cyclin D1 staining had an adverse prognosis, and the poor outcome was further accentuated if the tumours were also oestrogen receptor-negative. A possible explanation for our findings is that tumours in which cyclin D1 levels are abnormally low may have sustained mutations in other genes, such as RBI and that it is this abnormality that has the more significant impact on survival from breast cancer.
Overexpression of c-erbB2 is an independent marker of resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancerStephen Houston, T.A. Plunkett, D M Barnes et al.|British Journal of Cancer|1999 The present study investigated the interaction between c-erbB2 overexpression and the response to first-line endocrine therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. The primary tumours of 241 patients who were treated at first relapse with endocrine therapy were assessed for overexpression of c-erbB2 by immunohistochemistry. c-erbB2 was overexpressed in 76 (32%) of primary breast cancers and did not correlate with any other prognostic factor. The overall response to treatment and time to progression were significantly lower in patients with c-erbB2-positive tumours compared to those that were c-erbB2-negative (38% vs 56%, P = 0.02; and 4.1 months vs 8.7 months, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, c-erbB2 status was the most significant predictive factor for a short time to progression (P = 0.0009). In patients with ER-positive primary tumours treated at relapse with tamoxifen (n = 170), overexpression of c-erbB2 was associated with a significantly shorter time to progression (5.5 months vs 11.2 months, P < 0.001). In conclusion, overexpression of c-erbB2 in the primary tumour is an independent marker of relative resistance to first-line endocrine therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. In patients with ER-positive primary tumours, the overexpression of c-erbB2 defines a subgroup less likely to respond to endocrine therapy.