Tapio Videman

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of lifetime exposure to commonly suspected risk factors on disc degeneration using magnetic resonance imaging, and to estimate the effects of these suspected risk factors relative to age and familial aggregation, reflecting genetic and shared environmental influences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Structural and biochemical changes associated with disc degeneration are suspected as the underlying conditions of many back-related symptoms. Little is known about the determinants of disc degeneration. METHODS: Based on lifetime discordance in suspected environmental risk factors for disc degeneration, 115 male identical twin pairs were selected. An in-depth interview was conducted of occupational and leisure time physical loading, driving, and smoking. Disc degeneration was evaluated using observational and digital magnetic resonance imaging assessment methods. RESULTS: Heavier lifetime occupational and leisure physical loading was associated with greater disc degeneration in the upper lumbar levels (P = 0.055 - 0.001), whereas sedentary work was associated with lesser degeneration (P = 0.006). These univariate associations did not reach statistical significance in the lower lumbar region. In multivariate analyses of the upper lumbar levels, the mean job code explained 7% of the variability in observational disc degeneration scores; the addition of age explained 16%, and familial aggregation improved the model such that 77% of the variability was explained. In the lower lumbar levels, leisure time physical loading entered the multivariate model, explaining 2% of the variability. Adding age explained 9%, and familial aggregation raised the variability in disc degeneration scores explained to 43%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study findings suggest that disc degeneration may be explained primarily by genetic influences and by unidentified factors, which may include complex, unpredictable interactions. The particular environmental factors studied, which have been among those most widely suspected of accelerating disc degeneration, had very modest effects.

In Brief Study Design. A literature review. Objective. To synthesize the scientific literature on the prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration and factors associated with its occurrence, including genetic influences. Methods. A literature review was conducted of the prevalence of disc degeneration. Studies of the etiology of disc degeneration were summarized, with particular attention given to studies of genetic influences. Results and Conclusions. There are extreme variations in the reported prevalence of specific degenerative findings of the lumbar spine among studies, which cannot be explained entirely by age or other identifiable risk factors (e.g., prevalence figures for disc narrowing varied from 3% to 56%). It is likely that these variations are due, in great part, to inconsistencies in case definitions and measurements, which are impeding epidemiologic research on disc degeneration. Research conducted over the past decade has led to a dramatic shift in the understanding of disc degeneration and its etiology. Previously, heavy physical loading was the main suspected risk factor for disc degeneration. However, results of exposure-discordant monozygotic and classic twin studies suggest that physical loading specific to occupation and sport has a relatively minor role in disc degeneration, beyond that of upright postures and routine activities of daily living. Recent research indicates that heredity has a dominant role in disc degeneration, explaining 74% of the variance in adult populations studied to date. Since 1998, genetic influences have been confirmed by the identification of several gene forms associated with disc degeneration. The article reviews the epidemiology of lumbar disc degeneration, including what is known of its prevalence and factors associated with its occurrence. In particular, it highlights some of the research contributing to the dramatic shift taking place in the understanding of disc degeneration and its etiology. The role of genetic influences is a dominant feature of this shift.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between different physical loading conditions and findings of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We selected 117 male former top-level athletes (age range 45-68 years) who had participated in sports activities with distinctly different loading conditions: 28 had been long-distance runners, 31 soccer players, 29 weight lifters, and 29 shooters. Histories of lifetime occupational and athletic knee loading, knee injuries, and knee symptoms were obtained, and subjects were examined clinically and radiographically for knee findings of OA. RESULTS: The prevalence of tibiofemoral or patellofemoral OA based on radiographic examination was 3% in shooters, 29% in soccer players, 31% in weight lifters, and 14% in runners (P = 0.016 between groups). Soccer players had the highest prevalence of tibiofemoral OA (26%), and weight lifters had the highest prevalence of patellofemoral OA (28%). Subjects with radiographically documented knee OA had more symptoms, clinical findings, and functional limitations than did subjects without knee OA. By stepwise logistic regression analysis, the risk for having knee OA was increased in subjects with previous knee injuries (odds ratio [OR] 4.73), high body mass index at the age of 20 (OR 1.76/unit of increasing body mass index), previous participation in heavy work (OR 1.08/work-year), kneeling or squatting work (OR 1.10/work-year), and in subjects participating in soccer (OR 5.21). CONCLUSION: Soccer players and weight lifters are at increased risk of developing premature knee OA. The increased risk is explained in part by knee injuries in soccer players and by high body mass in weight lifters.

Research conducted over the past decade has led to a dramatic shift in the understanding of disc degeneration and its etiology. Previously, heavy physical loading-often associated with occupation-was the main suspected risk factor for disc degeneration, which was commonly viewed as a wear-and-tear phenomenon exacerbated by the precarious nutritional status of the disc. However, results of studies on twins suggest that physical loading specific to occupation and sport plays a relatively minor role in disc degeneration. Recent research indicates that heredity has a dominant role in disc degeneration, which would explain the variance of up to 74% seen in adult populations that have been studied to date. Since 1998, genetic influences have been confirmed by the identification of several gene forms associated with disc degeneration. This research is paving the way for a better understanding of the biologic mechanisms through which disc degeneration occurs, including specific interactions between genes and environment. Research into disc degeneration and genetics has become more limited by phenotypes or definitions and measures of disc degeneration than by DNA analysis. Standardized, universally accepted definitions of disc degeneration are lacking, in part due to limited knowledge of the process. The measurements that are selected depend on the method used to evaluate the disc and are often qualitative ordinal rating scales, lacking in precision. Although it is generally agreed that disc degeneration is common, the prevalence of specific findings is unclear. A review of the epidemiology of disc degeneration reveals wide-ranging prevalence estimates for various signs of disc degeneration in samples of the general population and in patients with back symptoms. The extreme variations in prevalence rates are likely largely due to inconsistencies in the definitions and measurements of disc degeneration. Such inconsistencies and inaccuracies impede epidemiologic research on disc degeneration.