Bianca Heemskerk

Tumor antigen-specific T cells are found within melanomas, yet tumors continue to grow. Although the tumor microenvironment is thought to influence the suppression of tumor-reactive T cells, the underlying mechanisms for this T-cell dysfunction are not clear. Here, we report that the majority of tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes (TIL), including MART-1/Melan-A melanoma antigen-specific CD8 T cells, predominantly expressed PD-1, in contrast to T cells in normal tissues and peripheral blood T lymphocytes (PBL). PD-1(+) TIL expressed CTLA-4 and Ki-67, markers that were not expressed by PD-1(-) TIL and T cells in the normal tissues and PBL. Moreover, PD-1(+) TIL were primarily HLA-DR(+) and CD127(-), in contrast to PD-1(-) TIL. Effector cytokine production by PD-1(+) TIL was impaired compared with PD-1(-) TIL and PBL. Collectively, the phenotypic and functional characterizations of TIL revealed a significantly higher frequency and level of PD-1 expression on TIL compared with normal tissue T-cell infiltrates and PBL, and PD-1 expression correlated with an exhausted phenotype and impaired effector function. These findings suggest that the tumor microenvironment can lead to up-regulation of PD-1 on tumor-reactive T cells and contribute to impaired antitumor immune responses.

The evidence for T-cell–mediated regression of human cancers such as non–small-cell lung carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and—in particular—melanoma after immunotherapy is strong. Anti-CTLA4 (ipilimumab) treatment has been approved for treatment of meta-static melanoma,1 and antibody-mediated blockade of PD-1, a second inhibitory receptor on T cells, has shown highly encouraging results in early clinical trials.2,3 Although the clinical activity of these treatments is apparent, it is still unknown which T-cell reactivities are involved in immunotherapy-induced cancer regression.4 T-cell reactivity against nonmutated tumor-associated self-antigens has been analyzed in patients treated with ipilimumab or with autologous tumor-infiltrating T cells, but the magnitude of the T-cell responses observed has been relatively modest.5,6 In part on the basis of such data, recognition of patient-specific mutant epitopes (hereafter referred to as neoantigens) has been suggested to be a potentially important component.7 A potential involvement of mutated epitopes in T-cell control would also fit well with the observation that the mutation load in sun-exposed melanomas is particularly high.8-10 Intriguingly, on the basis of animal model data, it has recently been suggested that (therapy-induced) analysis of T-cell reactivity against patient-specific neoantigens may be feasible through exploitation of cancer genome data.11,12 However, human data have thus far been lacking. Here we report a case of a patient with stage IV melanoma who exhibited a clinical response to ipilimumab treatment. Cancer exome–guided analysis of T-cell reactivity in this patient revealed reactivity against two neoantigens, including a dominant T-cell response against a mutant epitope of the ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related) gene product that increased strongly after ipilimumab treatment. These data provide the first demonstration (to our knowledge) of cancer exome–guided analysis to dissect the effects of melanoma immunotherapy.

Cell-based antitumor immunity is driven by CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells bearing TCR that recognize specific tumor-associated peptides bound to class I MHC molecules. Of several cellular proteins involved in T cell:target-cell interaction, the TCR determines specificity of binding; however, the relative amount of its contribution to cellular avidity remains unknown. To study the relationship between TCR affinity and cellular avidity, with the intent of identifying optimal TCR for gene therapy, we derived 24 MART-1:27-35 (MART-1) melanoma Ag-reactive tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) clones from the tumors of five patients. These MART-1-reactive clones displayed a wide variety of cellular avidities. alpha and beta TCR genes were isolated from these clones, and TCR RNA was electroporated into the same non-MART-1-reactive allogeneic donor PBMC and TIL. TCR recipient cells gained the ability to recognize both MART-1 peptide and MART-1-expressing tumors in vitro, with avidities that closely corresponded to the original TCR clones (p = 0.018-0.0003). Clone DMF5, from a TIL infusion that mediated tumor regression clinically, showed the highest avidity against MART-1 expressing tumors in vitro, both endogenously in the TIL clone, and after RNA electroporation into donor T cells. Thus, we demonstrated that the TCR appeared to be the core determinant of MART-1 Ag-specific cellular avidity in these activated T cells and that nonreactive PBMC or TIL could be made tumor-reactive with a specific and predetermined avidity. We propose that inducing expression of this highly avid TCR in patient PBMC has the potential to induce tumor regression, as an "off-the-shelf" reagent for allogeneic melanoma patient gene therapy.