Ashik Hayat

INTRODUCTION: The month of Ramadan holds great religious and social significance for Muslims all over the world. The aim of the present study was to provide a modified dialysis schedule for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients that allows for fasting and that minimizes the effect on the patient's general health and volume status. METHODS: We observed 31 patients under treatment at the PD unit of King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh. During the 3 - 4 weeks before the start of Ramadan, all patients were counseled individually and in detail about the possibility of fasting. They were also provided with clear instructions about fluid intake (up to 1 L daily) and avoiding a high-potassium diet. Of the 31 patients, 18 (10 women, 8 men) elected to fast during the month of Ramadan. The mean duration of fast in the study year (2009) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was about 14 hours: from 0415 h (before sunrise) to 1800 h (after sunset). Depending on membrane type and patient preference, the fasting group was shifted to one of two regimens: Modified continuous ambulatory PD (8 patients): 3 exchanges during the night (1.36% or 2.27%), and icodextrin for a long dwell during the day. The first dialysis exchange was performed immediately after breaking the fast (1900 h), and the next at 2300 h. The final exchange was performed in the early morning before sunrise (0300 h), when the icodextrin was infused. Modified continuous cycling PD (10 patients): exchanges (1.36% or 2.27%) were performed over 6 - 7 hours, and icodextrin was infused for a long dwell during the day. The patient connected to the cycler at 2000 h or 2100 h, and therapy finished at nearly 0300 h, with icodextrin as the last fill. RESULTS: Of the study patients, 2 were admitted because of peritonitis (1 in each modality group), and the modified therapy was discontinued. In the modified CCPD group, 1 patient (on PD for 1 month before Ramadan) developed PD-related pleural effusion (proved by pleural fluid analysis), and PD was consequently discontinued. Hypotension developed in 2 patients of the CAPD group and 1 of the CCPD group during the first 2 weeks. In the CCPD group, 1 patient presented with lower limb edema and mild fluid overload. Overall, PD patients that opted to fast during Ramadan did not experience any serious morbidity or deterioration in renal function during their period of observance. No biochemical parameters or clearance studies showed a statistically significant p value. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the study findings, we conclude that most stable patients on PD can fast, provided that they strictly adhere to their medications and dialysis therapy in addition to the dietary restrictions. These patients should be followed closely to detect any complications and to ensure that adequate fluid and electrolyte balance are maintained.

AIM: Technique failure is a major disadvantage associated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study aimed to analyse the demographic and risk predictors of technique failure and mortality in patients on PD. METHODS: All incidental PD patients registered on the New Zealand Peritoneal dialysis registry (NZPDR) from January 1995 to December 2014 were included in the study. The primary outcomes were time to technique failure and its specific causes, while as the secondary outcome was time to death. Risk predictors of technique failure and mortality were analysed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression model. Besides, competitive risk regression analysis was undertaken to analyse the effect of death as a competing event to technique failure. RESULTS: Of 6379 patients, there were 2993 (46.9%) episodes of technique failure and 2684 (42%) deaths. The crude technique failure and mortality rates were 165 ± 5.90 and 147.9 ± 5.50 (mean ± SD)/1000 patient-years, respectively. Hazards of technique failure were lower in older individuals above 60 years, HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.79), larger centres, HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-1.00) and higher with coiled catheters, HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.16-1.37). Early nephrology referral, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and Asian ethnicities were associated with better technique survival. Infections were the major cause of technique failure (58.4%) with peritonitis being the leading cause (30.2%). CONCLUSION: There are multiple factors associated with risk of technique failure, therefore it is persuasive to construct a mathematical model for early prediction, for a planned transition to HD.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) are two possible modalities for people with kidney failure commencing dialysis. Only a few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated PD versus HD. The benefits and harms of the two modalities remain uncertain. This review includes both RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of PD, compared to HD, in people with kidney failure initiating dialysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies from 2000 to June 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for NRSIs from 2000 until 28 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs and NRSIs evaluating PD compared to HD in people initiating dialysis were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators independently assessed if the studies were eligible and then extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using standard Cochrane methods, and relevant outcomes were extracted for each report. The primary outcome was residual kidney function (RKF). Secondary outcomes included all-cause, cardiovascular and infection-related death, infection, cardiovascular disease, hospitalisation, technique survival, life participation and fatigue. MAIN RESULTS: = 97%; very low certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The comparative effectiveness of PD and HD on the preservation of RKF, all-cause and cause-specific death risk, the incidence of bacteraemia, other vascular complications (e.g. stroke, cardiovascular events) and patient-reported outcomes (e.g. life participation and fatigue) are uncertain, based on data obtained mostly from NRSIs, as only two RCTs were included.

In order to evaluate the effects of peritoneal dialysis as a modality of renal replacement therapy for adults with acute renal failure (ARF) of varied etiologies, we studied 43 ARF patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis at our hospital from April 2004 to November 2005. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 75 years with a mean of 35 years. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ARF between males and females. Acute tubular necrosis secondary to acute gastroenteritis was the cause of ARF in 32 (80%) patients; four (10%) patients expired secondary to ARF. There was an average fall of around 60% in the S. creatinine at the end of PD. We did not notice any significant complications related to the procedure. We conclude that peritoneal dialysis is still a good option for the treatment of patients with ATN.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in the management of lupus nephritis (LN), these unfortunate patients are at a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Concomitant chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with adverse outcome in patients with LN and further compounds the risk as some of these patients choose to undergo kidney transplantation in the near future. Objectives. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the long-term impact of chronic HCV infection in patients with underlying Class IV LN on renal function, progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and patient survival. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of 134 nondialysis-dependent patients with biopsy-proven World Health Organization Class IV LN with chronic HCV infection was done from January 1995 to January 2008 at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Primary and the secondary end points were death or the development of ESRD. The patients were followed over a period of 6.7 ± 3.3 (1-14.4) years. RESULTS: From a total of 134 biopsy-proven Class IV LN patients, 15 (11.2%) patients were HCV positive of which 2 (13.3%) patients were male and 13 (86.7%) patients were female. One hundred and nineteen (88.8%) patients were HCV negative of which 17 (14.3%) were male and 102 (85.7%) were female. The mean age was 32.47 ± 11.8 years. Eight (53.3%) patients in the HCV-positive group versus 19 (22.6%) patients in the HCV-negative group progressed to severe renal impairment with serum creatinine >350 μmol/L (P = 0.024). A total of 8 (53.3%) patients in the HCV-positive group versus 18 (17.3%) in HCV-negative group progressed to ESRD (P = 0.005). The mean creatinine clearance was higher (43.3 ± 33 mL/min) in the HCV-negative LN group at last follow-up than in the HCV-positive patients (25 ± 34.9 mL/min) with a statistically significant P-value of 0.0463. Five patients (33.3%) with HCV-positive LN died in comparison to eight (7.6%) patients who were HCV negative P = 0.03; however, the cause of hospital mortality was mainly cardiovascular disease (CVD) and infection and none of the patients died of chronic liver disease, although there was significant deterioration of the liver function at the end of the study. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed a significantly inferior renal function and rapid deterioration to ESRD in LN patients with concomitant HCV infection, with a dialysis free survival of 95 and 80% for the HCV-negative group and 90 and 65% for the HCV-positive groups at the end of 5 and 10 years respectively, with a highly significant P-value of <0.05 at the end of 10 years. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights that concomitant HCV infection in patients with LN is associated with worse renal outcome, higher rate of progression to ESRD and reduced patient survival.