M

Michael Bornholdt

Broad Institute

Publishes on Cell Image Analysis Techniques, Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, Image Processing Techniques and Applications. 8 papers and 392 citations.

8Publications
392Total Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Learning representations for image-based profiling of perturbations
Nikita Moshkov, Michael Bornholdt, Santiago Benoit et al.|Nature Communications|2024
Cited by 99Open Access

Measuring the phenotypic effect of treatments on cells through imaging assays is an efficient and powerful way of studying cell biology, and requires computational methods for transforming images into quantitative data. Here, we present an improved strategy for learning representations of treatment effects from high-throughput imaging, following a causal interpretation. We use weakly supervised learning for modeling associations between images and treatments, and show that it encodes both confounding factors and phenotypic features in the learned representation. To facilitate their separation, we constructed a large training dataset with images from five different studies to maximize experimental diversity, following insights from our causal analysis. Training a model with this dataset successfully improves downstream performance, and produces a reusable convolutional network for image-based profiling, which we call Cell Painting CNN. We evaluated our strategy on three publicly available Cell Painting datasets, and observed that the Cell Painting CNN improves performance in downstream analysis up to 30% with respect to classical features, while also being more computationally efficient.

Learning representations for image-based profiling of perturbations
Nikita Moshkov, Michael Bornholdt, Santiago Benoit et al.|bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)|2022
Cited by 45Open Access

Abstract Measuring the phenotypic effect of treatments on cells through imaging assays is an efficient and powerful way of studying cell biology, and requires computational methods for transforming images into quantitative data that highlight phenotypic outcomes. Here, we present an optimized strategy for learning representations of treatment effects from high-throughput imaging data, which follows a causal framework for interpreting results and guiding performance improvements. We use weakly supervised learning (WSL) for modeling associations between images and treatments, and show that it encodes both confounding factors and phenotypic features in the learned representation. To facilitate their separation, we constructed a large training dataset with Cell Painting images from five different studies to maximize experimental diversity, following insights from our causal analysis. Training a WSL model with this dataset successfully improves downstream performance, and produces a reusable convolutional network for image-based profiling, which we call Cell Painting CNN-1 . We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of our strategy on three publicly available Cell Painting datasets, discovering that representations obtained by the Cell Painting CNN-1 can improve performance in downstream analysis for biological matching up to 30% with respect to classical features, while also being more computationally efficient.

Morphology and gene expression profiling provide complementary information for mapping cell state
Gregory P. Way, Ted Natoli, Adeniyi Adeboye et al.|bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)|2021
Cited by 30Open Access

Summary Morphological and gene expression profiling can cost-effectively capture thousands of features in thousands of samples across perturbations by disease, mutation, or drug treatments, but it is unclear to what extent the two modalities capture overlapping versus complementary information. Here, using both the L1000 and Cell Painting assays to profile gene expression and cell morphology, respectively, we perturb A549 lung cancer cells with 1,327 small molecules from the Drug Repurposing Hub across six doses, providing a data resource including dose-response data from both assays. The two assays capture both shared and complementary information for mapping cell state. Cell Painting profiles from compound perturbations are more reproducible and show more diversity, but measure fewer distinct groups of features. Applying unsupervised and supervised methods to predict compound mechanisms of action (MOA) and gene targets, we find that the two assays provide a partially shared, but also a complementary view of drug mechanisms. Given the numerous applications of profiling in biology, our analyses provide guidance for planning experiments that profile cells for detecting distinct cell types, disease phenotypes, and response to chemical or genetic perturbations.