The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolyticaThe genome sequence of the pathogen Entamoeba histolytica is reported this week. E. histolytica causes amoebiasis, the second most deadly protozoan disease after malaria. The genome contains adaptations shared with other anaerobic pathogens such as Trichomonas and Giardia. And there is evidence that the genome has been shaped by many gene transfers from bacteria, which may suggest possible targets for drugs against these organisms. The identification of a large number of sensing and signalling proteins challenges the idea that E. histolytica is a simple organism: in fact it is finely attuned to its environment. Entamoeba histolytica is an intestinal parasite and the causative agent of amoebiasis, which is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in developing countries1. Here we present the genome of E. histolytica, which reveals a variety of metabolic adaptations shared with two other amitochondrial protist pathogens: Giardia lamblia and Trichomonas vaginalis. These adaptations include reduction or elimination of most mitochondrial metabolic pathways and the use of oxidative stress enzymes generally associated with anaerobic prokaryotes. Phylogenomic analysis identifies evidence for lateral gene transfer of bacterial genes into the E. histolytica genome, the effects of which centre on expanding aspects of E. histolytica's metabolic repertoire. The presence of these genes and the potential for novel metabolic pathways in E. histolytica may allow for the development of new chemotherapeutic agents. The genome encodes a large number of novel receptor kinases and contains expansions of a variety of gene families, including those associated with virulence. Additional genome features include an abundance of tandemly repeated transfer-RNA-containing arrays, which may have a structural function in the genome. Analysis of the genome provides new insights into the workings and genome evolution of a major human pathogen.
Metronidazole Resistance in the Protozoan Parasite Entamoeba histolytica Is Associated with Increased Expression of Iron-containing Superoxide Dismutase and Peroxiredoxin and Decreased Expression of Ferredoxin 1 and Flavin ReductaseClaudia Wassmann, Andrea Hellberg, Egbert Tannich et al.|Journal of Biological Chemistry|1999 To obtain insight into the mechanism of metronidazole resistance in the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica, amoeba trophozoites were selected in vitro by stepwise exposures to increasing amounts of metronidazole, starting with sublethal doses of 4 microM. Subsequently, amoebae made resistant were able to continuously multiply in the presence of a 40 microM concentration of the drug. In contrast to mechanisms of metronidazole resistance in other protozoan parasites, resistant amoebae did not substantially down-regulate pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase or up-regulate P-glycoproteins, but exhibited increased expression of iron-containing superoxide dismutase (Fe-SOD) and peroxiredoxin and decreased expression of flavin reductase and ferredoxin 1. Episomal transfection and overexpression of the various antioxidant enzymes revealed significant reduction in susceptibility to metronidazole only in those cells overexpressing Fe-SOD. Reduction was highest in transfected cells simultaneously overexpressing Fe-SOD and peroxiredoxin. Although induced overexpression of Fe-SOD did not confer metronidazole resistance to the extent found in drug-selected cells, transfected cells quickly adapted to constant exposures of otherwise lethal metronidazole concentrations. Moreover, metronidazole selection of transfected amoebae favored retention of the Fe-SOD-containing plasmid. These results strongly suggest that peroxiredoxin and, in particular, Fe-SOD together with ferredoxin 1 are important components involved in the mechanism of metronidazole resistance in E. histolytica.
Structure and Content of the Entamoeba histolytica GenomeC Graham Clark, U. Cecilia M. Alsmark, Margit Helga Tazreiter et al.|Advances in Parasitology/Advances in parasitology|2007 <b><i>Entamoeba histolytica</i> and <i>Entamoeba dispar</i>: differences in numbers and expression of cysteine proteinase genes</b>In order to identify molecules that might be responsible for the difference in pathogenicity between the two closely related protozoan parasites Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar, we focussed on cysteine proteinases because this class of enzymes has been considered important for pathogenic tissue destruction. By screening a genomic library derived from an E. histolytica isolate, a total of six distinct genes (ehcp1-ehcp6) encoding typical prepro-forms of cysteine proteinases were identified which differed from each other by 40% to 85% of their nucleotide sequences. Three of these genes, ehcp1, ehcp2, and ehcp5, which exhibited high levels of expression, were found to be responsible for approximately 90% of cysteine proteinase transcripts, whereas the remaining three were either not or only marginally expressed. Expression of the different genes directly correlated with the level of activity of the respective enzymes in trophozoite lysates. Purification of the enzymes and N-terminal sequencing revealed that virtually all cysteine proteinase activity of E. histolytica can be attributed to three enzymes namely EhCP1, EhCP2 and EhCP5. Southern blot analysis indicated that just two of these abundantly expressed genes are missing in E. dispar. On the other hand, genes analogous to four of the six genes identified in E. histolytica were found to be present in E. dispar, but only two of these are expressed within the trophozoite stage.
The Intestinal Protozoan Parasite <i>Entamoeba histolytica</i> Contains 20 Cysteine Protease Genes, of Which Only a Small Subset Is Expressed during In Vitro CultivationCysteine proteases are known to be important pathogenicity factors of the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. So far, a total of eight genes coding for cysteine proteases have been identified in E. histolytica, two of which are absent in the closely related nonpathogenic species E. dispar. However, present knowledge is restricted to enzymes expressed during in vitro cultivation of the parasite, which might represent only a subset of the entire repertoire. Taking advantage of the current E. histolytica genome-sequencing efforts, we analyzed databases containing more than 99% of all ameba gene sequences for the presence of cysteine protease genes. A total of 20 full-length genes was identified (including all eight genes previously reported), which show 10 to 86% sequence identity. The various genes obviously originated from two separate ancestors since they form two distinct clades. Despite cathepsin B-like substrate specificities, all of the ameba polypeptides are structurally related to cathepsin L-like enzymes. None of the previously described enzymes but 7 of the 12 newly identified proteins are unique compared to cathepsins of higher eukaryotes in that they are predicted to have transmembrane or glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor attachment domains. Southern blot analysis revealed that orthologous sequences for all of the newly identified proteases are present in E. dispar. Interestingly, the majority of the various cysteine protease genes are not expressed in E. histolytica or E. dispar trophozoites during in vitro cultivation. Therefore, it is likely that at least some of these enzymes are required for infection of the human host and/or for completion of the parasite life cycle.