Jumanah Alshenaifi

PURPOSE: , among other MAPK-pathway members. However, this was primarily on the basis of single-agent EGFRi trials and little is known about the resistance mechanisms of EGFRi combined with effective cytotoxic chemotherapy in previously untreated patients. METHODS: wild-type metastatic CRC enrolled in three large randomized trials evaluating EGFRi in the first line in combination with chemotherapy and as a single agent in third line. The mutational signature of the alterations acquired with therapy was evaluated. CRC cell lines with resistance to cetuximab, infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, and SN38 were developed, and transcriptional changes profiled. RESULTS: Patients whose tumors were treated with and responded to EGFRi alone were more likely to develop acquired mutations (46%) compared with those treated in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy (9%). Furthermore, contrary to the generally accepted hypothesis of the clonal evolution of acquired resistance, we demonstrate that baseline resistant subclonal mutations rarely expanded to become clonal at progression, and most remained subclonal or disappeared. Consistent with this clinical finding, preclinical models with acquired resistance to either cetuximab or chemotherapy were cross-resistant to the alternate agents, with transcriptomic profiles consistent with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. By contrast, commonly acquired resistance alterations in the MAPK pathway do not affect sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: These findings support a model of resistance whereby transcriptomic mechanisms of resistance predominate in the presence of active cytotoxic chemotherapy combined with EGFRi, with a greater predominance of acquired MAPK mutations after single-agent EGFRi. The proposed model has implications for prospective studies evaluating EGFRi rechallenge strategies guided by acquired MAPK mutations, and highlights the need to address transcriptional mechanisms of resistance.

Abstract Purpose: AT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A) is commonly mutated in colorectal cancer, frequently resulting in truncation and loss of protein expression. ARID1A recruits MSH2 for mismatch repair during DNA replication. ARID1A deficiency promotes hypermutability and immune activation in preclinical models, but its role in patients with colorectal cancer is being explored. Experimental Design: The DNA sequencing and gene expression profiling of patients with colorectal cancer were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas and MD Anderson Cancer Center databases, with validation utilizing external databases, and correlation between ARID1A and immunologic features. IHC for T-cell markers was performed on a separate cohort of patients. Results: Twenty-eight of 417 patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (6.7%) had ARID1A mutation. Among 58 genes most commonly mutated in colorectal cancer, ARID1A mutation had the highest increase with frameshift mutation rates in MSS cases (8-fold, P < 0.001). In MSS, ARID1A mutation was enriched in immune subtype (CMS1) and had a strong correlation with IFNγ expression (Δz score +1.91, P < 0.001). Compared with ARID1A wild-type, statistically significant higher expression for key checkpoint genes (e.g., PD-L1, CTLA4, and PDCD1) and gene sets (e.g., antigen presentation, cytotoxic T-cell function, and immune checkpoints) was observed in mutant cases. This was validated by unsupervised differential expression of genes related to immune response and further confirmed by higher infiltration of T cells in IHC of tumors with ARID1A mutation (P = 0.01). Conclusions: The immunogenicity of ARID1A-mutant cases is likely due to an increased level of neoantigens resulting from increased tumor mutational burden and frameshift mutations. Tumors with ARID1A mutation may be more susceptible to immune therapy–based treatment strategies and should be recognized as a unique molecular subgroup in future immune therapy trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Treatment strategies for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) such as major hepatectomy and portal vein embolization (PVE) rely on liver regeneration. We aim to investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration occurring after PVE and after major hepatectomy. METHODS: CRCLM patients undergoing PVE or major resection were identified retrospectively from our database. Liver regeneration data (expressed as future liver remnant [FLR] and percentage of liver regeneration [%LR]), total liver volume (TLV) and clinical characteristics were collected. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2013, 226 patients were included (85 major resection, 141 PVE). The median chemotherapy cycles was six in both groups. The median time interval between the last chemotherapy and the intervention was 51 days in the PVE group and 79 days in the hepatectomy group. In the PVE group, chemotherapy was not associated with altered liver regeneration (number of cycles [P = 0.435], timing [P = 0.563], or chemotherapy agent [P = 0.116]). Similarly in the major hepatectomy group, preoperative chemotherapy (number of cycles [P = 0.114]; agent [P = 0.061], timing [P = 0.126]) were not significantly associated with differences in liver regeneration (P = 0.592). In both groups, the predicted FLR% was inversely correlated with the %LR (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy does not affect liver regeneration following PVE or major resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:449-455. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Defects in the peroxisomes biogenesis and/or function result in peroxisomal disorders. In this study, we describe the largest Arab cohort to date (72 families) of clinically, biochemically and molecularly characterized patients with peroxisomal disorders. At the molecular level, we identified 43 disease-causing variants, half of which are novel. The founder nature of many of the variants allowed us to calculate the minimum disease burden for these disorders in our population ~1:30 000, which is much higher than previous estimates in other populations. Clinically, we found an interesting trend toward genotype/phenotype correlation in terms of long-term survival. Nearly half (40/75) of our peroxisomal disorders patients had documented survival beyond 1 year of age. Most unusual among the long-term survivors was a multiplex family in which the affected members presented as adults with non-specific intellectual disability and epilepsy. Other unusual presentations included the very recently described peroxisomal fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 disorder as well as CRD, spastic paraparesis, white matter (CRSPW) syndrome. We conclude that peroxisomal disorders are highly heterogeneous in their clinical presentation. Our data also confirm the demonstration that milder forms of Zellweger spectrum disorders cannot be ruled out by the "gold standard" very long chain fatty acids assay, which highlights the value of a genomics-first approach in these cases.

BACKGROUND: The characterization of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 has been a subject of concern and controversy, especially with the surge of infections with highly transmissible variants worldwide. METHODS: This retrospective national study used comorbidities, vaccination status, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, and demographics data to profile participants who were reinfected with SARS-CoV-2, defined as having two reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-positive SARS-CoV-2 tests within at least 90 days apart. A multivariate logistic regression model assessed the risk factors associated with reinfection . Two control groups were selected: nonreinfected participants reporting a positive test (control group one) and those reporting a negative test (control group two). RESULTS: Between March 2020 and December 2021, 4454 reinfected participants were identified in Saudi Arabia (0.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-0.8). The majority (67.3%) were unvaccinated (95% CI 65.9-68.7) and 0.8% (95% CI 0.6-1.1) had severe or fatal SARS-CoV-2 disease. COVID-19 vaccines were 100% effective against mortality in reinfected individuals who received at least one dose, whereas it conferred 61% (odds ratio [OR] 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.0) additional protection against severe disease after the first dose and 100% after the second dose. In the risk factor analysis, reinfection was highly associated with comorbidities, such as HIV (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-5.2; P = 0.009), obesity (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-3.9; P = 0.003), pregnancy (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.4; P = 0.005), and working in health care facilities (OR 6.1, 95% CI 3.1-12.9; P <0.0001). The delta variant (B.1.617.2) was the most frequent variant of concern among the reinfected cohort. CONCLUSION: This in-depth study of the reinfection profile identified risk factors and highlighted the associated SARS-CoV-2 variants. Results showed that naturally acquired immunity to SARS-CoV-2 through multiple reinfections together with vaccine-induced immunity provided substantial protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 disease and mortality.