Differential Regulation of microRNAs by p53 Revealed by Massively Parallel Sequencing: miR-34a is a p53 Target That Induces Apoptosis and G1-arrestIn a genome-wide screen for microRNAs regulated by the transcription factor encoded by the p53 tumor suppressor gene we found that after p53-activation the abundance of thirty-four miRNAs was significantly increased, whereas sixteen miRNAs were suppressed. The induction of miR-34a was most pronounced among all differential regulations. Also expression of the primary miR-34a transcript was induced after p53 activation and by DNA damage in a p53-dependent manner. p53 occupied an evolutionarily conserved binding site proximal to the first non-coding exon of miR-34a. Ectopic miR-34a induced apoptosis and a cell cycle arrest in the G1-phase, thereby suppressing tumor cell proliferation. Other p53-induced miRNAs identified here may also have tumor suppressive potential as they are known to suppress the anti-apoptotic factor Bcl2 (miR-15a/16) and the oncogenes RAS and HMGA2 (let-7a). Our results for the first time directly integrate the regulation of miRNA expression into the transcriptional network regulated by p53. siRNAs corresponding to p53-induced miRNAs may have potential as cancer therapeutic agents as RNA interference based therapies are currently emerging.
Inactivation of miR-34a by aberrant CpG methylation in multiple types of cancerRecently, we and others identified the microRNA miR-34a as a target of the tumor suppressor gene product p53. Ectopic miR-34a induces a G(1) cell cycle arrest, senescence and apoptosis. Here we report that miR-34a expression is silenced in several types of cancer due to aberrant CpG methylation of its promoter. 19 out of 24 (79.1%) primary prostate carcinomas displayed CpG methylation of the miR-34a promoter and concomitant loss of miR-34a expression. CpG methylation of the miR-34a promoter was also detected in breast (6/24; 25%), lung (7/24; 29.1%), colon (3/23; 13%), kidney (3/14; 21.4%), bladder (2/6; 33.3%) and pancreatic (3/19; 15.7%) carcinoma cell lines, as well as in melanoma cell lines (19/44; 43.2%) and primary melanoma (20/32 samples; 62.5%). Silencing of miR-34a was dominant over its transactivation by p53 after DNA damage. Re-expression of miR-34a in prostate and pancreas carcinoma cell lines induced senescence and cell cycle arrest at least in part by targeting CDK6. These results show that miR-34a represents a tumor suppressor gene which is inactivated by CpG methylation and subsequent transcriptional silencing in a broad range of tumors.
Functional Epigenomics Identifies Genes Frequently Silenced in Prostate CancerIn many cases, silencing of gene expression by CpG methylation is causally involved in carcinogenesis. Furthermore, cancer-specific CpG methylation may serve as a tumor marker. In order to identify candidate genes for inactivation by CpG methylation in prostate cancer, the prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, PC3, and Du-145 were treated with 5-aza-2' deoxycytidine and trichostatin A, which leads to reversion of epigenetic silencing. By microarray analysis of 18,400 individual transcripts, several hundred genes were found to be induced when compared with cells treated with trichostatin A. Fifty re-expressed genes were selected for further analysis based on their known function, which implied a possible involvement in tumor suppression. Twelve of these genes showed a significant degree of CpG methylation in their promoters. Six genes were silenced by CpG methylation in the majority of five analyzed prostate cancer cell lines, although they displayed robust mRNA expression in normal prostate epithelial cells obtained from four different donors. In primary prostate cancer samples derived from 41 patients, the frequencies of CpG methylation detected in the promoter regions of these genes were: GPX3, 93%; SFRP1, 83%; COX2, 78%; DKK3, 68%; GSTM1, 58%; and KIP2/p57, 56%. Ectopic expression of SFRP1 or DKK3 resulted in decreased proliferation. The expression of DKK3 was accompanied by attenuation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The high frequency of CpG methylation detected in the promoters of the identified genes suggests a potential causal involvement in prostate cancer and may prove useful for diagnostic purposes.
Cockayne’s Syndrome A and B Proteins Regulate Transcription Arrest after Genotoxic Stress by Promoting ATF3 Degradationc-MYC Delays Prometaphase by Direct Transactivation of MAD2 and BubR1: Identification of Mechanisms Underlying c-MYC-Induced DNA Damage and Chromosomal InstabilityHere we show that the human BubR1 and MAD2 genes, which encode inhibitors of the anaphase promoting complex (APC/C), are directly activated by the oncogenic transcription factor c-MYC via E-box sequences in their first introns. In colorectal cancer biopsies elevated expression of c-MYC correlated with increased MAD2 levels. Activation of a conditional c-MYC allele delayed progression through mitosis in pro-metaphase in a MAD2- and BubR1-dependent manner. A fraction of the daughter cells derived from extended mitotic events underwent synchronous apoptosis, which was in part mediated by BubR1. Furthermore, c-MYC activation resulted in CIN (chromosomal instability) in the diploid MIN (microsatellite instability) cell line DLD-1 and further enhanced CIN in the aneuploid CIN-line MCF7. Unexpectedly, c-MYC-induced CIN was independent of c-MYC-induced BubR1/MAD2 expression and mitotic delay. Therefore, c-MYC-induced CIN may be caused be alternative pathways. We observed that activation of c-MYC induced DNA double-strand breaks, as evidenced by formation of gamma-H2AX foci, which colocalized with foci of active DNA replication. Furthermore, c-MYC activation resulted in mitotic chromosomes exhibiting DNA damage. Therefore, oncogenic deregulation of c-MYC prevents repair of replication-stress induced DNA lesions in the G(2)-phase. We suggest that the c-MYC-mediated persistence of DNA lesions throughout mitosis leads to chromosomal missegregation and underlies c-MYC-induced CIN. The effects of deregulated c-MYC on progression through mitosis described here may have important implications for the origin of chromosomal instability in many tumor types and the sensitivity towards cancer therapeutic agents targeting DNA or the mitotic spindle.