FGFR3 protein expression and its relationship to mutation status and prognostic variables in bladder cancerFGFR3 is frequently activated by mutation in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and represents a potential target for therapy. In multiple myeloma, both over-expression and mutation of FGFR3 contribute to tumour development. To define the population of UC patients who may benefit from FGFR-targeted therapy, we assessed both mutation and receptor over-expression in primary UCs from a population of new patients. Manual or laser capture microdissection was used to isolate pure tumour cell populations. Where present, non-invasive and invasive components in the same section were microdissected. A screen of the region of the highest tumour stage in each sample yielded a mutation frequency of 42%. Mutations comprised 61 single and five double mutations, all in hotspot codons previously identified in UC. There was a significant association of mutation with low tumour grade and stage. Subsequently, non-invasive areas from the 43 tumours with both non-invasive and invasive components were analysed separately; 18 of these had mutation in at least one region, including nine with mutation in all regions examined, eight with mutation in only the non-invasive component and one with different mutations in different regions. Of the eight with mutation in only the non-invasive component, six were predicted to represent a single tumour and two showed morphological dissimilarity of fragments within the block, indicating the possible presence of distinct tumour clones. Immunohistochemistry showed over-expression of FGFR3 protein in many tumours compared to normal bladder and ureteric controls. Increased expression was associated with mutation (85% of mutant tumours showed high-level expression). Overall, 42% of tumours with no detectable mutation showed over-expression, including many muscle-invasive tumours. This may represent a non-mutant subset of tumours in which FGFR3 signalling contributes to the transformed phenotype and which may benefit from FGFR-targeted therapies.
Affimer proteins are versatile and renewable affinity reagentsMolecular recognition reagents are key tools for understanding biological processes and are used universally by scientists to study protein expression, localisation and interactions. Antibodies remain the most widely used of such reagents and many show excellent performance, although some are poorly characterised or have stability or batch variability issues, supporting the use of alternative binding proteins as complementary reagents for many applications. Here we report on the use of Affimer proteins as research reagents. We selected 12 diverse molecular targets for Affimer selection to exemplify their use in common molecular and cellular applications including the (a) selection against various target molecules; (b) modulation of protein function in vitro and in vivo; (c) labelling of tumour antigens in mouse models; and (d) use in affinity fluorescence and super-resolution microscopy. This work shows that Affimer proteins, as is the case for other alternative binding scaffolds, represent complementary affinity reagents to antibodies for various molecular and cell biology applications.
Small molecule FGF receptor inhibitors block FGFR-dependent urothelial carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivoBACKGROUND: Activating mutations of FGFR3 are frequently identified in superficial urothelial carcinoma (UC) and increased expression of FGFR1 and FGFR3 are common in both superficial and invasive UC. METHODS: The effects of inhibition of receptor activity by three small molecule inhibitors (PD173074, TKI-258 and SU5402) were investigated in a panel of bladder tumour cell lines with known FGFR expression levels and FGFR3 mutation status. RESULTS: All inhibitors prevented activation of FGFR3, and inhibited downstream MAPK pathway signalling. Response was related to FGFR3 and/or FGFR1 expression levels. Cell lines with the highest levels of FGFR expression showed the greatest response and little or no effect was measured in normal human urothelial cells or in UC cell lines with activating RAS gene mutations. In sensitive cell lines, the drugs induced cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. IC(50) values for PD173074 and TKI-258 were in the nanomolar concentration range compared with micromolar concentrations for SU5402. PD173074 showed the greatest effects in vitro and in vivo significantly delayed the growth of subcutaneous bladder tumour xenografts. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that inhibition of FGFR1 and wild-type or mutant FGFR3 may represent a useful therapeutic approach in patients with both non-muscle invasive and muscle invasive UC.