Naftali Stern

The Metabolic Syndrome is a cluster of cardio-metabolic risk factors and comorbidities conveying high risk of both cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. It is responsible for huge socio-economic costs with its resulting morbidity and mortality in most countries. The underlying aetiology of this clustering has been the subject of much debate. More recently, significant interest has focussed on the involvement of the circadian system, a major regulator of almost every aspect of human health and metabolism. The Circadian Syndrome has now been implicated in several chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. There is now increasing evidence connecting disturbances in circadian rhythm with not only the key components of the Metabolic Syndrome but also its main comorbidities including sleep disturbances, depression, steatohepatitis and cognitive dysfunction. Based on this, we now propose that circadian disruption may be an important underlying aetiological factor for the Metabolic Syndrome and we suggest that it be renamed the 'Circadian Syndrome'. With the increased recognition of the 'Circadian Syndrome', circadian medicine, through the timing of exercise, light exposure, food consumption, dispensing of medications and sleep, is likely to play a much greater role in the maintenance of both individual and population health in the future.

BACKGROUND: 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 exerts multiple effects in human vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). We therefore tested the possibility that VSMCs possess an endogenous 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1alpha-hydroxylase system, the final enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of 1,25(OH)2D3. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the expression and activity of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1alpha-hydroxylase by real-time polymerase chain reaction and the conversion of 25(OH)D3 into 1,25(OH)2D3. First, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1alpha-hydroxylase mRNA was identified in cultured VSMCs by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Second, in cells treated daily (3 days) with parathyroid hormone (66 nmol/L), estradiol-17beta (30 nmol/L), raloxifene (3 micromol/L), and the phytoestrogens genistein (3 micromol/L), biochainin A (3 micromol/L), and 6-carboxy biochainin A (30 nmol/L), 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1alpha-hydroxylase mRNA increased by 43+/-13%, (P<0.05) 7+/-24% (P=NS), 176+/-28% (P<0.01), 65+/-11% (P<0.05), 152+/-24% (P<0.01), and 71+/-9% (P<0.05), respectively. Third, production of 1,25(OH)2D3 from 25(OH)D3 was seen with a Km of 25 ng/mL and increased dose dependently after treatment with parathyroid hormone, genistein, and the phytosetrogen derivative 6-carboxy biochainin A. Estradiol-17beta and biochainin A also increased the generation of 1,25(OH)2D3 by 40+/-23% (P<0.05) and 55+/-13% (P<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We provide here the first evidence for the expression of an enzymatically active 25(OH)D3-1alpha-hydroxylase system in human VSMCs, which can be upregulated by parathyroid hormone and estrogenic compounds. Because exogenous vitamin D inhibits VSMC proliferation, the role of this system as an autocrine mechanism to curb changes in VSMC proliferation and phenotype is a subject for future investigation.

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin is a potent GH secretagogue that also plays an important role in appetite and weight regulation. Ghrelin increases hunger and food intake, and its levels decrease after a standard meal or glucose. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of standard oral glucose, lipid and protein loads on ghrelin levels, investigating the possibility that these responses may be modulated by several anthropometric and metabolic factors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: There were 24 adult nondiabetic subjects (13 men/11 women; mean age 55.3 +/- 2.9 years, range 26-74 years). Each participant underwent one or more of the following nutrient loads: (i) a standard oral glucose (75 g) load (n = 18); (ii) an oral lipid load (40 g, with 24 g saturated fat; n = 13); (iii) an oral protein load (40 g; n = 11). RESULTS: Fasting ghrelin levels were negatively related to body mass index (BMI; r =-0.47; P = 0.02), waist circumference (r = -0.58; P = 0.0028), waist/hip ratio (r = -0.56; P = 0.0046), fasting insulin (r = -0.44, P = 0.03), and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-R; r = -0.43, P = 0.034). Glucose load induced a decrease in ghrelin levels (P < 0.0001), and this response was modulated by sex (P < 0.0001), in that levels were significantly higher in females. The presence of obesity affected ghrelin response to glucose (< 0.0217), in that log-transformed ghrelin levels started to increase back to baseline after its initial decline earlier in obese than in lean subjects. Ghrelin levels after a glucose load were lower over time in subjects with more pronounced insulin resistance (P < 0.0001). Similarly, ghrelin levels decreased significantly following the lipid meal (P = 0.035), and were modulated by HOMA-R (P = 0.027) and gender (P = 0.029). Protein did not affect ghrelin levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ghrelin levels respond in a different manner to glucose, lipid and protein loads, and are subject to modulation according to gender, obesity and insulin sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperprolactinaemia in humans may be associated with a high prevalence of obesity but the nature of this link is poorly defined. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between hyperprolactinaemia and body weight in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary tumours. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study of prolactinoma patients treated at the Endocrine Institute of the Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel, during the period 1989-1996. Patients with clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFA) served as the control group. Data on demographic parameters, body weight before and during treatment, clinical presentation including history of weight fluctuations, tumour size as measured by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, modalities and response to treatment, and pituitary function before and during treatment were recorded from medical files. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with prolactinomas (PR) and 36 patients with clinically non-functioning macroadenomas (NFA) comprised the study population. RESULTS: Mean weight was 93 +/- 3.4 kg and 78 +/- 2.7 kg in male patients with PR and NFA respectively (P = 0.0007). Recent weight gain (8 to 22 kg) was a presenting symptom in 13 PR patients, whereas only one NFA patient had this clinical presentation (P = 0.001). Seventeen PR patients lost weight (mean change -8.3 +/- 1.5 kg, range -2-28 kg), during prolactin lowering therapy, 11 of whom had entirely normalized prolactin levels. Fourteen of the 18 patients who did not lose weight still had elevated prolactin levels (P = 0.01). Weight loss in patients with PR could not be attributed to altered pituitary function nor to compression of the third ventricle. In contrast to PR, no significant weight loss was observed in NFA patients. CONCLUSION: Weight gain and elevated body weight are frequently associated with prolactinomas regardless of a mass effect on the hypothalamus or pituitary function. In this series, weight loss was recorded in 70% of prolactinomas patients and in 90% of male patients who normalized their prolactin levels. We propose the inclusion of hyperprolactinaemia in the differential diagnosis of endocrine obesity and weight gain.