Timothy N. C. Wells

During organogenesis, immunosurveillance, and inflammation, chemokines selectively recruit leukocytes by activating seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors. It has been suggested that an important component of this process is the formation of a haptotactic gradient by immobilization of chemokines on cell surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). However, this hypothesis has not been experimentally demonstrated in vivo. In the present study we investigated the effect of mutations in the GAG binding sites of three chemokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/CC chemokine ligand (CCL)2, macrophage-inflammatory protein-1beta/CCL4, and RANTES/CCL5, on their ability to recruit cells in vivo. These mutant chemokines retain chemotactic activity in vitro, but they are unable to recruit cells when administered intraperitoneally. Additionally, monomeric variants, although fully active in vitro, are devoid of activity in vivo. These data demonstrate that both GAG binding and the ability to form higher-order oligomers are essential for the activity of particular chemokines in vivo, although they are not required for receptor activation in vitro. Thus, quaternary structure of chemokines and their interaction with GAGs may significantly contribute to the localization of leukocytes beyond migration patterns defined by chemokine receptor interactions.

The chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 have recently been shown to act as coreceptors, in concert with CD4, for human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) infection. RANTES and other chemokines that interact with CCR5 and block infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures inhibit infection of primary macrophages inefficiently at best. If used to treat HIV-1-infected individuals, these chemokines could fail to influence HIV replication in nonlymphocyte compartments while promoting unwanted inflammatory side effects. A derivative of RANTES that was created by chemical modification of the amino terminus, aminooxypentane (AOP)-RANTES, did not induce chemotaxis and was a subnanomolar antagonist of CCR5 function in monocytes. It potently inhibited infection of diverse cell types (including macrophages and lymphocytes) by nonsyncytium-inducing, macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains. Thus, activation of cells by chemokines is not a prerequisite for the inhibition of viral uptake and replication. Chemokine receptor antagonists like AOP-RANTES that achieve full receptor occupancy at nanomolar concentrations are strong candidates for the therapy of HIV-1-infected individuals.

Chemokines selectively recruit and activate a variety of cells during inflammation. Interactions between cell surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and chemokines drive the formation of haptotactic or immobilized gradients of chemokines at the site of inflammation, directing this recruitment. Chemokines bind to glycosaminoglycans on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with affinities in the micromolar range: RANTES > MCP-1 > IL-8 > MIP-1alpha. This binding can be competed with by soluble glycosaminoglycans: heparin, heparin sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, and dermatan sulfate. RANTES binding showed the widest discrimination between glycosaminoglycans (700-fold), whereas MIP-1alpha was the least selective. Almost identical results were obtained in an assay using heparin sulfate beads as the source of immobilized glycosaminoglycan. The binding of chemokines to glycosaminoglycan fragments has a strong length dependence, and optimally requires both N- and O-sulfation. Isothermal titration calorimetry data confirm these results; IL-8 binds heparin fragments with a K(d) of 0.39-2.63 microM, and requires five saccharide units to bind each monomer of chemokine. In membranes from cells expressing the G-protein-coupled chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, and CCR1, soluble GAGs inhibit the binding of chemokine ligands to their receptors. Consistent with this, heparin and heparin sulfate could inhibit IL-8-induced neutrophil calcium flux. Chemokines can therefore form complexes with both cell surface and soluble GAGs; these interactions have different functions. Soluble GAG chemokines complexes are unable to bind the receptor, resulting in a block of the biological activity. Previously, we have shown that cell surface GAGs present chemokines to the G-protein-coupled receptors, by increasing the local concentration of protein. A model is presented which brings together all of these data. The selectivity in the chemokine-GAG interaction suggests selective disruption of the haptotactic gradient may be an achievable therapeutic approach in inflammatory disease.