Roberto Buzzoni

BACKGROUND: The unsatisfactory control of neuroendocrine tumor growth with chemotherapy and/or interferon (IFN-2a) stimulated us to investigate the role of the somatostatin analogue octreotide (SMS 201.995), which is reported to be highly effective in controlling carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Octreotide has been used in a wide range of doses, and it was postulated that higher doses might lead to an objective response. METHODS: The aim of the present multicenter Phase II study was to determine the safety and efficacy of SMS 201.995 in controlling carcinoids and other neuroendocrine tumors. Fifty-eight patients were treated subcutaneously with 2 sequential doses of the drug (Sandostatina, Sandoz, Inc., S.b.A. Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland). The first 23 patients received 500 micrograms 3 times a day and the remaining 35 patients received 1000 micrograms 3 times a day. The treatment was continued until the tumor progressed. RESULTS: All of the patients were adequately treated and evaluated. The predominant histotype was carcinoid, although there were instances of medullary thyroid carcinoma, pancreatic islet cell tumors, and Merkel cell carcinoma. Carcinoid syndrome was documented in 16 patients and abnormal urinary 5-hydroxyindoloacetic acid excretion in 15. The median treatment duration was 5 months (range, 2-31 months). The responses were evaluated in three categories: tumor regression for tumor growth control, symptom response, and biochemical response. There was an effect on tumor growth in two patients with carcinoids. Symptomatic control was achieved in 73% of patients and a biochemical response in 77% of patients. In twenty-seven patients, the disease stabilized for at least 6 months (range, 6-32+). The median survival time for all patients was 22 months (range, 1-32+). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of tumor regression, octreotide is disappointing (partial response: 3%); symptomatic response and biochemical control are satisfactory. These data confirm that somatostatin analogues are comparable to interferons in the treatment of carcinoid syndrome, although other efforts are necessary to control tumor regression.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are defined as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) with a Ki-67 index >20% according to the 2010 WHO classification. Some reports suggest that this category is heterogeneous. We retrospectively studied a series of 136 patients affected by grade 3 GEP-NECs with the aim to clarify the prognostic role of tumor morphological differentiation, proliferation, defect in mismatch repair proteins (MMRd), CD117 expression, and site of origin. The primary endpoint was the correlation between these parameters and the overall survival (OS). METHODS: Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess the prognostic significance of various clinical and histopathologic features. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 81 months, the median OS was 12.9 months. At multivariate analysis, morphological differentiation, Ki-67 index, MMRd, stage, and CD117 expression were independent prognostic markers in NECs. Three different prognostic categories of NECs were identified according to the degree of morphologic differentiation (well vs. poorly differentiated) and Ki-67 index (<55% vs. ≥55%). On this basis, median OS was 43.6 months in well-differentiated neoplasms with a Ki-67 index 20-55% (named type A), 24.5 months in poorly differentiated neoplasms with a Ki-67 index 20-55% (type B), and 5.3 months (p < 0.0001) in poorly differentiated neoplasms with a Ki-67 index ≥55% (type C). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that GEP-NECs represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms which can be better classified in different prognostic categories using both tumor morphology and Ki-67 index.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine in older women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three eligible patients (median age, 73 years; range, 65 to 89 years) were enrolled. The first 30 patients received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. Due to the occurrence of two toxic deaths, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily was given to the subsequent 43 patients. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. A total of 351 treatment cycles were administered (median, six per patient; range, one to eight cycles). Dose reductions due to toxicities were required in 30% of patients in the standard-dose group, but capecitabine was given without a dose reduction to 95% of patients in the low-dose group. Capecitabine demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The overall incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was low: the most common events reported in </= 10% of the patients were fatigue, diarrhea, dyspnea, and nausea. In the standard-dose group, the response rate was 36.7% (95% CI, 19.9% to 56.1%). An additional seven patients had disease stabilization at >/= 24 weeks. In the low-dose group, the response rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 21% to 50.9%). An additional 15 patients had prolonged stabilization. The median time to disease progression was 4 months in either group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that capecitabine is safe and effective in the elderly breast cancer patient. Based on the overall results, the capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily merits consideration as "standard" for older patients who do not have severely impaired renal function.