C Broyet

BACKGROUND: Sparsentan, a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist, significantly reduced proteinuria versus irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, at 36 weeks (primary endpoint) in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy in the phase 3 PROTECT trial's previously reported interim analysis. Here, we report kidney function and outcomes over 110 weeks from the double-blind final analysis. METHODS: PROTECT, a double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 study, was done across 134 clinical practice sites in 18 countries throughout the Americas, Asia, and Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven primary IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of at least 1·0 g per day despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibition for at least 12 weeks were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sparsentan (target dose 400 mg oral sparsentan once daily) or irbesartan (target dose 300 mg oral irbesartan once daily) based on a permuted-block randomisation method. The primary endpoint was proteinuria change between treatment groups at 36 weeks. Secondary endpoints included rate of change (slope) of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), changes in proteinuria, a composite of kidney failure (confirmed 40% eGFR reduction, end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality), and safety and tolerability up to 110 weeks from randomisation. Secondary efficacy outcomes were assessed in the full analysis set and safety was assessed in the safety set, both of which were defined as all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of randomly assigned study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762850. FINDINGS: per year, 95% CI -0·03 to 1·94; p=0·058). The significant reduction in proteinuria at 36 weeks with sparsentan was maintained throughout the study period; at 110 weeks, proteinuria, as determined by the change from baseline in urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, was 40% lower in the sparsentan group than in the irbesartan group (-42·8%, 95% CI -49·8 to -35·0, with sparsentan versus -4·4%, -15·8 to 8·7, with irbesartan; geometric least-squares mean ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·50 to 0·72). The composite kidney failure endpoint was reached by 18 (9%) of 202 patients in the sparsentan group versus 26 (13%) of 202 patients in the irbesartan group (relative risk 0·7, 95% CI 0·4 to 1·2). Treatment-emergent adverse events were well balanced between sparsentan and irbesartan, with no new safety signals. INTERPRETATION: Over 110 weeks, treatment with sparsentan versus maximally titrated irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy resulted in significant reductions in proteinuria and preservation of kidney function. FUNDING: Travere Therapeutics.

We used ganciclovir to treat 11 renal transplant recipients with symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection (seven primary), including one severe, five mild and five moderate cases. Two patients exhibited a non-mechanically ventilated pneumonitis and two others a gastrointestinal involvement. Ganciclovir was used intravenously according to a schedule which took into account renal function, for a median time of 14 days. All patients survived. Cytomegalovirus infection was cured in all patients but two: in the first an early clinical relapse required a second successful ganciclovir course; in the other graftectomy was needed to control infection. Graft was lost in an additional cured patient. Ganciclovir was well tolerated, especially with regard to haematological status. At the current follow-up of at least one month after the end of ganciclovir therapy, no further clinical relapse was observed; however, in one clinically cured patient cytomegalovirus was isolated from blood one week after ganciclovir cessation. These encouraging preliminary data suggest that ganciclovir therapy should be started as soon as cytomegalovirus infection is suspected, especially in cytomegalovirus seronegative recipients receiving a seropositive graft.

With the aim to improve renal graft function and to prevent hypertension, we used the calcium-antagonist diltiazem in a prospective randomized study in 30 consecutive cadaveric renal transplanted patients from september 1987 to may 1988. The diltiazem (D+) group comprised 14 patients receiving a loading dose of 0.3 mg/kg followed by a 2 micrograms/kg/d continuous IV infusion of D started as soon as possible after clamp on renal artery removal. D was then given orally (120-180 mg/d) throughout the study. 16 patients without D composed the D- group. Cyclosporine A (csa) was started either just before transplantation (15 mg/kg/d orally) in 18 patients (9 D+ and 9 D-) or after 2-3 weeks of poly or monoclonal antibodies (5 D+ and 7 D- at 10 mg/kg/d. In addition to the usual monitoring, inulin (for GFR) and PAH (for ERBF), clearances were performed 7 days and 3 months after transplantation. If hypertension (blood pressure greater than 160/90 mm Hg) occurred, all but calcium-antagonists antihypertensive agents were used in both groups. Between D+ and D-, the number of patients requiring haemodialysis during the first week was not different (7/14 vs 5/16) like the number of dialysis session per patient (1.4 vs 1.1) day 7 GFR (19 +/- 22 vs 23 +/- 20) and day 7 ERBF (146 +/- 147 vs 226 +/- 224) ml/mn/1.73 m2; at 3 months 13/14 (93 p. 100) vs 12/15 (80 p. 100) of the grafts are functioning (NS), GFR (34 +/- 17 vs 33 +/- 10) and ERBF (242 +/- 90 vs 236 +/- 117) are not different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)