I

Ingmar Hoerr

CureVac (Germany)

Publishes on Immunotherapy and Immune Responses, RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers. 25 papers and 3.2k citations.

25Publications
3.2kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Direct Injection of Protamine-protected mRNA: Results of a Phase 1/2 Vaccination Trial in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
Benjamin Weide, Steve Pascolo, Birgit Scheel et al.|Journal of Immunotherapy|2009
Cited by 379

In mice, injection of messenger RNA (mRNA) coding for tumor-associated antigens can induce antitumor immune responses and therefore offers a broadly applicable immunotherapy approach. We injected intradermally protamine-stabilized mRNAs coding for Melan-A, Tyrosinase, gp100, Mage-A1, Mage-A3, and Survivin in 21 metastatic melanoma patients. In 10 patients keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) was added to the vaccine. Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor was applied as an adjuvant. Endpoints were toxicity and immune responses. No adverse events more than grade II have been observed. During treatment the frequency of Foxp3+/CD4+ regulatory T cells was significantly decreased upon mRNA vaccination in peripheral blood of the patients in the KLH arm, whereas myeloid suppressor cells (CD11b+HLA-DR lo monocytes) were reduced in the patients not receiving KLH. A reproducible increase of vaccine-directed T cells was observed in 2 of 4 immunologically evaluable patients. One of 7 patients with measurable disease showed a complete response. In conclusion, we show here that direct injection of protamine-protected mRNA is feasible and safe. The significant influence of the treatment on the frequency of immunosuppressive cells, the increase of vaccine-directed T cells upon treatment in a subset of patients together with the demonstration of a complete clinical response encourage further clinical investigation of the protamine-mRNA vaccine.

<i>In vivo</i> application of RNA leads to induction of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and antibodies
Ingmar Hoerr, Reinhard Obst, Hans‐Georg Rammensee et al.|European Journal of Immunology|2000
Cited by 358

To study the efficiency of RNA-based vaccines, RNA coding for the model antigen beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) was transcribed in vitro from a lacZ gene flanked by stabilizing Xenopus laevis beta-globin 5' and 3' sequences and was protected from RNase degradation by condensation with the polycationic peptide protamine. The liposome-encapsulated condensed RNA-peptide complex, the condensed RNA-peptide complex without liposome or naked, unprotected RNA, was injected into BALB/c (H-2(d)) mice. All preparations led to protein expression in the local tissue, activation of L(d)-restricted specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and production of IgG antibodies reactive against beta-gal. RNA-triggered CTL were as efficient in the lysis of lacZ-transfected target cells as CTL triggered by a lacZ-DNA eukaryotic expression vector. Immunization with RNA transcribed from a cDNA library from the beta-gal-expressing cell line P13.1 again led to beta-gal-specific CTL and IgG induction. Thus, both naked and protected RNA can be used to elicit a specific immune response in vivo, whereby the protected RNA is stable in vitro for a longer period of time. RNA vaccines can be produced in high amounts and have the same major advantages as DNA vaccines but lack the potentially harmful effect of DNA integration into the genome.

Self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccination in advanced prostate cancer patients: a first-in-man phase I/IIa study
Hubert Kübler, Birgit Scheel, Ulrike Gnad-Vogt et al.|Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer|2015
Cited by 284Open Access

BACKGROUND: CV9103 is a prostate-cancer vaccine containing self-adjuvanted mRNA (RNActive®) encoding the antigens PSA, PSCA, PSMA, and STEAP1. This phase I/IIa study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of CV9103 in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate-cancer. METHODS: 44 Patients received up to 5 intra-dermal vaccinations. Three dose levels of total mRNA were tested in Phase I in cohorts of 3-6 patients to determine a recommended dose. In phase II, 32 additional patients were treated at the recommended dose. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, the secondary endpoint was induction of antigen specific immune responses monitored at baseline and at weeks 5, 9 and 17. RESULTS: The most frequent adverse events were grade 1/2 injection site erythema, injection site reactions, fatigue, pyrexia, chills and influenza-like illness. Possibly treatment related urinary retention occurred in 3 patients. The recommended dose was 1280 μg. A total of 26/33 evaluable patients treated at 1280 μg developed an immune response, directed against multiple antigens in 15 out of 33 patients. One patient showed a confirmed PSA response. In the subgroup of 36 metastatic patients, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 31.4 months [95 % CI: 21.2; n.a]. CONCLUSIONS: The self-adjuvanted RNActive® vaccine CV9103 was well tolerated and immunogenic. The technology is a versatile, fast and cost-effective platform allowing for creation of vaccines. The follow-up vaccine CV9104 including the additional antigens prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and Muc1 is currently being tested in a randomized phase IIb trial to assess the clinical benefit induced by this new vaccination approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT number 2008-003967-37, registered 27 Jan 2009.

Results of the First Phase I/II Clinical Vaccination Trial With Direct Injection of mRNA
Benjamin Weide, Jean‐Philippe Carralot, Anne Reese et al.|Journal of Immunotherapy|2008
Cited by 258

Vaccination against tumor antigens has been shown to be a safe and efficacious prophylactic and therapeutic antitumor treatment in many animal models. Clinical studies in humans indicate that specific immunotherapy can also result in clinical benefits. The active pharmaceutical ingredient in such vaccines can be DNA, RNA, protein, or peptide and can be administered naked, encapsulated, or after delivery in vitro into cells that are then adoptively transferred. One of the easiest, most versatile and theoretically safest technologies relies on the direct injection of naked messenger RNA (mRNA) that code for tumor antigens. We and others have shown in mice that intradermal application of naked mRNA results in protein expression and the development of an immune response. We used this protocol to vaccinate 15 melanoma patients. For each patient a growing metastasis was removed, total RNA was extracted, reverse-transcribed, amplified, and cloned. Libraries of cDNA were transcribed to produce unlimited amounts of copy mRNA. Autologous preparations were applied intradermally in combination with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor as adjuvant. We demonstrate here that such treatment is feasible and safe (phase 1 criteria). Furthermore, an increase in antitumor humoral immune response was seen in some patients. However, a demonstration of clinical effectiveness of direct injection of copy mRNA for antitumor immunotherapy was not shown in this study and must be evaluated in subsequent trials.