Carolann McGuire

Recent evidence has demonstrated that acquired uniparental disomy (aUPD) is a novel mechanism by which pathogenetic mutations in cancer may be reduced to homozygosity. To help identify novel mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), we performed a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) screen to identify aUPD in 58 patients with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML; n = 30), JAK2 mutation-negative myelofibrosis (MF; n = 18), or JAK2 mutation-negative polycythemia vera (PV; n = 10). Stretches of homozygous, copy neutral SNP calls greater than 20Mb were seen in 10 (33%) aCML and 1 (6%) MF, but were absent in PV. In total, 7 different chromosomes were involved with 7q and 11q each affected in 10% of aCML cases. CBL mutations were identified in all 3 cases with 11q aUPD and analysis of 574 additional MPNs revealed a total of 27 CBL variants in 26 patients with aCML, myelofibrosis or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Most variants were missense substitutions in the RING or linker domains that abrogated CBL ubiquitin ligase activity and conferred a proliferative advantage to 32D cells overexpressing FLT3. We conclude that acquired, transforming CBL mutations are a novel and widespread pathogenetic abnormality in morphologically related, clinically aggressive MPNs.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have suggested that drug-specific lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPA) can be used retrospectively to confirm the culprit drug following delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR). However, only limited evidence supports their use in aiding acute clinical management. The aim of this study was to compare the LPA against combination cytokine assays for potential use in the acute setting. METHODS: A total of 43 patients with DHR (19 during the acute reaction, 20 after recovery, four during acute and after recovery) and 14 control subjects without DHR were investigated using ex vivo analysis of drug-specific proliferation, and interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-4 production. RESULTS: Healthy controls showed negative drug-specific proliferation and cytokine release in contrast to individuals with a known sensitivity (P < 0·0001). The assays demonstrated a test specificity of 95% (LPA), 83% (IFN-γ) and 92% (IL-4). The sensitivity of combined measurement of drug-specific IFN-γ and IL-4 cytokines during acute DHR was better than LPA (82% vs. 50%), but all assays were less sensitive during the recovery phase. The correlation between LPA and IFN-γ assays was strong (r = 0·7, P < 0·0001), whereas the IL-4 assay did not correlate as well with either of these assays. In contrast to LPA, drug enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays showed positive responses in patients concurrently taking immunosuppressive medication. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro assays of drug-specific IFN-γ and IL-4 production offer potential for use as rapid diagnostic tests. Cytokine detection offers distinct advantages over the LPA, including a shorter assay time, a greater sensitivity and effectiveness in testing immunosuppressed patients.

Contact allergy to environmental xenobiotics is a common and important problem, but it is unclear why some chemicals are potent sensitizers and others weak/nonsensitizers. We explored this by investigating why similar chemicals, 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) and 2,4-dinitrothiocyanobenzene (DNTB), differ in their ability to induce contact hypersensitivity (CHS). DNCB induced CHS in humans, whereas at similar doses DNTB did not. However, following DNCB sensitization, DNTB elicited CHS in vivo and stimulated DNCB-responsive T cells in vitro, suggesting that differences in response to these compounds lie in the sensitization phase. In contrast to DNCB, DNTB failed to induce emigration of epidermal Langerhans cells in naive individuals. Examination for protein dinitrophenylation in skin revealed that DNCB penetrated into the epidermis, whereas DNTB remained bound to a thiol-rich band within the stratum corneum. DNTB reacted rapidly with reduced glutathione in vitro and was associated with a decrease in the free thiol layer in the stratum corneum, but not in the nucleated epidermis. By contrast, DNCB required GST facilitation to react with gluthathione and, following penetration through the stratum corneum, depleted thiols in the viable epidermis. Chemical depletion of the thiol-rich band or removing it by tape stripping allowed increased penetration of DNTB into the epidermis. Our results suggest that the dissimilar sensitizing potencies of DNCB and DNTB in humans are determined by a previously undescribed outer epidermal biochemical redox barrier, a chemical component of the innate immune defense mechanisms that defend against sensitization by highly reactive environmental chemicals.