The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status: a population-based studyShunquan Wu, Rui Wang, Yanfang Zhao et al.|BMC Public Health|2013 BACKGROUND: Self-rated health (SRH), a subjective assessment of health status, is extensively used in the public health field. However, whether SRH can reflect the objective health status is still debatable. We aim to reveal the relationship between SRH and objective health status in the general population. METHODS: We assessed the relationship between SRH and objective health status by examining the prevalence of diseases, laboratory parameters, and some health-related factors in different SRH groups. Data were collected from 18,000 residents randomly sampled from the general population in five cities of China (3,600 in each city). SRH was assessed by a single-item health measure with five options: "very good," "good," "fair," "bad," and "very bad." The differences in prevalence of diseases, laboratory parameters, and health-related factors between the "healthy" (very good plus good), "relatively healthy" (fair), and "unhealthy" (bad plus very bad) groups were examined. The odds ratios (ORs) referenced by the healthy group were calculated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of all diseases was associated with poorer SRH. The tendency was more prominent in cardio-cerebral vascular diseases, visual impairment, and mental illnesses with larger ORs. Residents with abnormalities in laboratory parameters tended to have poorer SRH, with ORs ranging from 1.62 (for triglyceride) to 3.48 (for hemoglobin among men) in a comparison of the unhealthy and healthy groups. Most of the health-related factors regarded as risks were associated with poorer SRH. Among them, life and work pressure, poor spiritual status, and poor quality of interpersonal relationships were the most significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: SRH is consistent with objective health status and can serve as a global measure of health status in the general population.
Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trialJunjie Zhang, Fei Ye, Kai Xu et al.|European Heart Journal|2020 AIM: The present study aimed to assess the benefits of two-stent techniques for patients with DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 653 patients with complex bifurcation lesions at 49 international centres were randomly assigned to undergo the systematic two-stent technique (two-stent group) or provisional stenting (provisional group). The primary endpoint was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF) at the 1-year follow-up, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The safety endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis. At the 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 37 (11.4%) and 20 (6.1%) patients in the provisional and two-stent groups, respectively [77.8%: double-kissing crush; hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.90; P = 0.019], largely driven by increased TVMI (7.1%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.90; P = 0.025) and clinically driven TLR (5.5%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-1.00; P = 0.049) in the provisional group. At the 1 year after indexed procedures, the incidence of cardiac death was 2.5% in the provisional group, non-significant to 2.1% in the two-stent group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.37; P = 0.772). CONCLUSION: For DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions, the systematic two-stent approach was associated with a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with the provisional stenting approach. Further study is urgently warranted to identify the mechanisms contributing to the increased rate of TVMI after provisional stenting. STUDY REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.com; Identifier: NCT02284750.
Health related quality of life measured by SF-36: a population-based study in Shanghai, ChinaRui Wang, Cheng Wu, Yanfang Zhao et al.|BMC Public Health|2008 BACKGROUND: Health related quality of life (HRQL) is a research topic that has attracted increasing interests around the world over the past two decades. The 36-item Short Form (SF-36) is a commonly used instrument for measuring HRQL. However, the information on Chinese adults' quality of life is limited. This paper reports on the feasibility of using the Mandarin version of SF-36 to evaluate HRQL in the population of Shanghai, China. METHODS: A total of 1034 subjects were randomly sampled using a stratified multiple-stage sampling method in Shanghai. Demographic information was collected, and SF-36 was used to measure HRQL. RESULTS: Internal reliability coefficients were greater than 0.7 in six of the eight SF-36 dimensions, except social function and mental health. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.689 to 0.972. Split-half reliability coefficients were higher than 0.9 in five SF-36 dimensions. Validity was assessed by factor analysis and correlation analysis. Our results were basically in accordance with the theoretical construction of SF-36. The average scores of most SF-36 dimensions were higher than 80. The primary influencing risk factors of HRQL included chronic diseases, age, frequency of activities, and geographical region, which were identified using multivariate stepwise regression. CONCLUSION: Overall, HRQL in the population of Shanghai is quite good. The Mandarin version of SF-36 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing HRQL.
Exclusion of Older Adults and Women from Recent Trials of Acute Coronary SyndromesKatherine Dodd, Jane S. Saczynski, Yanfang Zhao et al.|Journal of the American Geriatrics Society|2011 OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the participation of older adults and women in published clinical trials has increased during recent years. DESIGN: Systematic review to identify clinical trials of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) published from May 2007 to May 2009. Trials were excluded if they enrolled fewer than 50 participants, were substudies of previously published trials, or initiated treatment more than 3 weeks after the acute cardiac event. SETTING: A search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight thousand sixteen participants of 80 trials. MEASUREMENTS: Information on the age of trial participants, percentage of participants who were female, and whether there were specific exclusions based on age were abstracted from all included trials. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials (29.7%) had explicit exclusion criteria based on age. Only 13.8% of study participants were aged 75 and older, and 27.7% were women. These percentages are below the representation of all U.S. adults experiencing an ACS in recent years who were aged 75 and older (41.9%) or female (41.5%). The average age of all study participants was 61.6 ± 3.8. There was a significant association between the mean age of a study population and the proportion of women enrolled in the trial. CONCLUSION: Older adults and women remain underrepresented in recent clinical trials of people hospitalized with an ACS. These exclusions may hinder efforts to inform evidence-based clinical decision-making in these high-risk populations.
Hepatitis viruses infection and risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: evidence from a meta-analysisBACKGROUND: Studies investigating the association between Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have reported inconsistent findings. We conducted a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies to explore this relationship. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the eligible studies of hepatitis infections and ICC risk up to September 2011. Summary odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated with random-effects models using Review Manager version 5.0. RESULTS: Thirteen case-control studies and 3 cohort studies were included in the final analysis. The combined risk estimate of all studies showed statistically significant increased risk of ICC incidence with HBV and HCV infection (OR = 3.17, 95% CI, 1.88-5.34, and OR = 3.42, 95% CI, 1.96-5.99, respectively). For case-control studies alone, the combined OR of infection with HBV and HCV were 2.86 (95% CI, 1.60-5.11) and 3.63 (95% CI, 1.86-7.05), respectively, and for cohort studies alone, the OR of HBV and HCV infection were 5.39 (95% CI, 2.34-12.44) and 2.60 (95% CI, 1.36-4.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that both HBV and HCV infection are associated with an increased risk of ICC.