Slanted spiral microfluidics for the ultra-fast, label-free isolation of circulating tumor cellsThe enumeration and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), found in the peripheral blood of cancer patients, provide a potentially accessible source for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. This work reports on a novel spiral microfluidic device with a trapezoidal cross-section for ultra-fast, label-free enrichment of CTCs from clinically relevant blood volumes. The technique utilizes the inherent Dean vortex flows present in curvilinear microchannels under continuous flow, along with inertial lift forces which focus larger CTCs against the inner wall. Using a trapezoidal cross-section as opposed to a traditional rectangular cross-section, the position of the Dean vortex core can be altered to achieve separation. Smaller hematologic components are trapped in the Dean vortices skewed towards the outer channel walls and eventually removed at the outer outlet, while the larger CTCs equilibrate near the inner channel wall and are collected from the inner outlet. By using a single spiral microchannel with one inlet and two outlets, we have successfully isolated and recovered more than 80% of the tested cancer cell line cells (MCF-7, T24 and MDA-MB-231) spiked in 7.5 mL of blood within 8 min with extremely high purity (400-680 WBCs mL(-1); ~4 log depletion of WBCs). Putative CTCs were detected and isolated from 100% of the patient samples (n = 10) with advanced stage metastatic breast and lung cancer using standard biomarkers (CK, CD45 and DAPI) with the frequencies ranging from 3-125 CTCs mL(-1). We expect this simple and elegant approach can surmount the shortcomings of traditional affinity-based CTC isolation techniques as well as enable fundamental studies on CTCs to guide treatment and enhance patient care.
IFI16-dependent STING signaling is a crucial regulator of anti-HER2 immune response in HER2+ breast cancerL.S. Ong, Wee Chyan Lee, Shijun Ma et al.|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|2022 Relapse to anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies, such as trastuzumab in HER2 + breast cancer (BC), is associated with residual disease progression due to resistance to therapy. Here, we identify interferon-γ inducible protein 16 (IFI16)-dependent STING signaling as a significant determinant of trastuzumab responses in HER2 + BC. We show that down-regulation of immune-regulated genes (IRG) is specifically associated with poor survival of HER2 + , but not other BC subtypes. Among IRG, IFI16 is identified as a direct target of EZH2, the underexpression of which leads to deficient STING activation and downstream CXCL10/11 expression in response to trastuzumab treatment. Dual inhibition of EZH2 and histone deacetylase (HDAC) significantly activates IFI16-dependent immune responses to trastuzumab. Notably, a combination of a novel histone methylation inhibitor with an HDAC inhibitor induces complete tumor eradication and long-term T cell memory in a HER2 + BC mouse model. Our findings demonstrate an epigenetic regulatory mechanism suppressing the expression of the IFI16-CXCL10/11 signaling pathway that provides a survival advantage to HER2 + BC to confer resistance to trastuzumab treatment.
Neratinib Plus Paclitaxel vs Trastuzumab Plus Paclitaxel in Previously Untreated Metastatic ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer: The NEfERT-T Randomized Clinical TrialAbstract Importance Efficacious ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-directed treatments, in addition to trastuzumab and lapatinib, are needed. Objective To determine whether neratinib, an irreversible pan-ERBB tyrosine kinase inhibitor, plus paclitaxel improves progression-free survival compared with trastuzumab plus paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic ERBB2-positive breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants In the randomized, controlled, open-label NEfERT-T trial conducted from ...
Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysisAbstract Objective To compare the efficacy of covid-19 vaccines between immunocompromised and immunocompetent people. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Central Register of Controlled Trials, COVID-19 Open Research Dataset Challenge (CORD-19), and WHO covid-19 databases for studies published between 1 December 2020 and 5 November 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched in November 2021 to identify registered but as yet unpublished or ongoing studies. Study selection Prospective observational studies comparing the efficacy of covid-19 vaccination in immunocompromised and immunocompetent participants. Methods A frequentist random effects meta-analysis was used to separately pool relative and absolute risks of seroconversion after the first and second doses of a covid-19 vaccine. Systematic review without meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titre levels was performed after first, second, and third vaccine doses and the seroconversion rate after a third dose. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. Results 82 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 77 (94%) used mRNA vaccines, 16 (20%) viral vector vaccines, and 4 (5%) inactivated whole virus vaccines. 63 studies were assessed to be at low risk of bias and 19 at moderate risk of bias. After one vaccine dose, seroconversion was about half as likely in patients with haematological cancers (risk ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.50, I 2 =80%; absolute risk 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.40, I 2 =89%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.53, 0.39 to 0.71, I 2 =89%; 0.29, 0.11 to 0.58, I 2 =97%), and solid cancers (0.55, 0.46 to 0.65, I 2 =78%; 0.44, 0.36 to 0.53, I 2 =84%) compared with immunocompetent controls, whereas organ transplant recipients were 16 times less likely to seroconvert (0.06, 0.04 to 0.09, I 2 =0%; 0.06, 0.04 to 0.08, I 2 =0%). After a second dose, seroconversion remained least likely in transplant recipients (0.39, 0.32 to 0.46, I 2 =92%; 0.35, 0.26 to 0.46), with only a third achieving seroconversion. Seroconversion was increasingly likely in patients with haematological cancers (0.63, 0.57 to 0.69, I 2 =88%; 0.62, 0.54 to 0.70, I 2 =90%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.75, 0.69 to 0.82, I 2 =92%; 0.77, 0.66 to 0.85, I 2 =93%), and solid cancers (0.90, 0.88 to 0.93, I 2 =51%; 0.89, 0.86 to 0.91, I 2 =49%). Seroconversion was similar between people with HIV and immunocompetent controls (1.00, 0.98 to 1.01, I 2 =0%; 0.97, 0.83 to 1.00, I 2 =89%). Systematic review of 11 studies showed that a third dose of a covid-19 mRNA vaccine was associated with seroconversion among vaccine non-responders with solid cancers, haematological cancers, and immune mediated inflammatory disorders, although response was variable in transplant recipients and inadequately studied in people with HIV and those receiving non-mRNA vaccines. Conclusion Seroconversion rates after covid-19 vaccination were significantly lower in immunocompromised patients, especially organ transplant recipients. A second dose was associated with consistently improved seroconversion across all patient groups, albeit at a lower magnitude for organ transplant recipients. Targeted interventions for immunocompromised patients, including a third (booster) dose, should be performed. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021272088.