Caner Süsal

BACKGROUND: The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results. METHODS: With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report. RESULTS: A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.

BACKGROUND: Good HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR matches do not guarantee rejection-free renal transplantation. Some kidney transplants fail despite such matches, suggesting that other antigens might be targets for rejection. Major-histocompatibility-complex (MHC) class I-related chain A (MICA) antigens are polymorphic and can elicit antibody production. We sought to determine whether an immune response to MICA antigens might play a role in the failure of kidney allografts. METHODS: Pretransplantation serum samples from 1910 recipients of kidney transplants from deceased donors were tested for anti-MICA antibodies with an assay in which single MICA antigens were attached to polystyrene microspheres. RESULTS: Antibodies against MICA alleles were detected in 217 of the 1910 patients (11.4%). The presence of MICA antibodies was associated with renal-allograft rejection. The mean (+/-SE) 1-year graft-survival rate was 88.3+/-2.2% among recipients with anti-MICA antibodies as compared with 93.0+/-0.6% among recipients without anti-MICA antibodies (P=0.01). Among recipients of first kidney transplants, the survival rate was even lower among MICA antibody-positive patients (87.8+/-2.4%) than among MICA antibody-negative recipients (93.5+/-0.6%, P=0.005). In addition, the association of MICA sensitization with reduced graft survival was more evident in kidney-transplant recipients with good HLA matching: among 326 recipients who received well-matched kidneys (0 or 1 HLA-A plus HLA-B plus HLA-DR mismatch), sensitization against MICA was associated with poorer allograft survival (83.2+/-5.8% among those with anti-MICA antibodies vs. 95.1+/-1.3% among those without such antibodies, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Presensitization of kidney-transplant recipients against MICA antigens is associated with an increased frequency of graft loss and might contribute to allograft loss among recipients who are well matched for HLA.

BACKGROUND: Reports from experienced centers suggest that recipients of an ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplant after reduction of ABO antibodies experience no penalty in graft and patient survival versus ABO-compatible transplants, but confirmation that these results can be widely replicated is lacking. METHODS: Living-donor kidney transplants from ABO-incompatible donors after ABO antibody reduction registered with the Collaborative Transplant Study during 2005 to 2012 were analyzed and compared with (i) a matched group of ABO-compatible transplant recipients and (ii) all ABO-compatible transplants from centers that performed at least five ABO-incompatible grafts during the study period. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred twenty living-donor ABO-incompatible kidney transplants were analyzed. Three-year death-censored graft survival was virtually identical for ABO-incompatible transplants versus matched and center controls (P=0.92 and P=0.60, respectively). Patient survival rates were also similar (P=0.15 and P=0.11, respectively). Early patient survival was lower in ABO-incompatible grafts (P=0.006 vs. matched controls; P=0.001 vs. center controls) because of a higher rate of early infectious death (P=0.037 and P<0.001, respectively). Death-censored graft and patient survival were not significantly affected by induction therapy and anti-CD20 treatment. ABO antibody reduction by column adsorption was associated with similar death-censored graft survival to plasmapheresis. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of prospectively collected data from a large series of ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplants performed at 101 centers, death-censored graft and patient survival rates were similar to those achieved in ABO-compatible control groups over the same period.

The identification of high immunologic responders is desirable for the selection of appropriate immunosuppressive regimens. With the collaboration of 29 transplant centers in 15 countries, we investigated whether the pretransplant serum content of soluble CD30 (sCD30), a marker for the activation state of Th2-type cytokine producing T cells, is a useful predictor of kidney graft outcome. Pretransplant sera of 3899 cadaver kidney recipients were tested for serum sCD30 concentration using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Subsequent kidney graft survival was analyzed. The 5-yr graft survival rate in 901 recipients with a high pretransplant serum sCD30 (> or =100 U/ml) was 64 +/- 2%, significantly lower than the 75 +/- 1% rate in 2998 recipients with low sCD30 (<100 U/ml) (P < 0.0001). High sCD30 was associated primarily with graft loss and not with patient death. The sCD30 effect on graft survival was evident in first transplants as well as in retransplants, in presensitized patients with lymphocytotoxic antibodies as well as in nonsensitized patients, and in patients who received HLA well-matched kidneys as well as in patients who received poorly matched grafts. Recipients with a high pretransplant sCD30 needed significantly more rejection treatment after the first posttransplant year and continued to lose grafts at a higher rate during the 5-yr follow-up period, indicating that pretransplant sCD30 predicts not only the risk of acute rejection but also of chronic allograft nephropathy.