F

François P. Duhoux

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

ORCID: 0000-0002-5429-7888

Publishes on Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies, Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research. 270 papers and 4.2k citations.

270Publications
4.2kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, and Capecitabine for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Rashmi K. Murthy, Sherene Loi, Alicia Okines et al.|New England Journal of Medicine|2019
Cited by 1.3kOpen Access

BACKGROUND: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer who have disease progression after therapy with multiple HER2-targeted agents have limited treatment options. Tucatinib is an investigational, oral, highly selective inhibitor of the HER2 tyrosine kinase. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine, who had or did not have brain metastases, to receive either tucatinib or placebo, in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. The primary end point was progression-free survival among the first 480 patients who underwent randomization. Secondary end points, assessed in the total population (612 patients), included overall survival, progression-free survival among patients with brain metastases, confirmed objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Progression-free survival at 1 year was 33.1% in the tucatinib-combination group and 12.3% in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.71; P<0.001), and the median duration of progression-free survival was 7.8 months and 5.6 months, respectively. Overall survival at 2 years was 44.9% in the tucatinib-combination group and 26.6% in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.88; P = 0.005), and the median overall survival was 21.9 months and 17.4 months, respectively. Among the patients with brain metastases, progression-free survival at 1 year was 24.9% in the tucatinib-combination group and 0% in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.69; P<0.001), and the median progression-free survival was 7.6 months and 5.4 months, respectively. Common adverse events in the tucatinib group included diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. Diarrhea and elevated aminotransferase levels of grade 3 or higher were more common in the tucatinib-combination group than in the placebo-combination group. CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases, adding tucatinib to trastuzumab and capecitabine resulted in better progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes than adding placebo; the risks of diarrhea and elevated aminotransferase levels were higher with tucatinib. (Funded by Seattle Genetics; HER2CLIMB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02614794.).

Phase I Study of <sup>68</sup>Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Carcinoma
Marleen Keyaerts, Catarina Xavier, Johannes Heemskerk et al.|Journal of Nuclear Medicine|2015
Cited by 434Open Access

UNLABELLED: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is one of the major tumor characteristics in breast cancer to guide therapy. Anti-HER2 treatment has clear survival advantages in HER2-positive breast carcinoma patients. Heterogeneity in HER2 expression between primary tumor and metastasis has repeatedly been described, resulting in the need to reassess HER2 status during the disease course. To avoid repeated biopsy with potential bias due to tumor heterogeneity, Nanobodies directed against HER2 have been developed as probes for molecular imaging. Nanobodies, which are derived from unique heavy-chain-only antibodies, are the smallest antigen-binding antibody fragments and have ideal characteristics for PET imaging. The primary aims were assessment of safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry. The secondary aim was to investigate tumor-targeting potential. METHODS: In total, 20 women with primary or metastatic breast carcinoma (score of 2+ or 3+ on HER2 immunohistochemical assessment) were included. Anti-HER2-Nanobody was labeled with (68)Ga via a NOTA derivative. Administered activities were 53-174 MBq (average, 107 MBq). PET/CT scans for dosimetry assessment were obtained at 10, 60, and 90 min after administration. Physical evaluation and blood analysis were performed for safety evaluation. Biodistribution was analyzed for 11 organs using MIM software; dosimetry was assessed using OLINDA/EXM. Tumor-targeting potential was assessed in primary and metastatic lesions. RESULTS: No adverse reactions occurred. A fast blood clearance was observed, with only 10% of injected activity remaining in the blood at 1 h after injection. Uptake was seen mainly in the kidneys, liver, and intestines. The effective dose was 0.043 mSv/MBq, resulting in an average of 4.6 mSv per patient. The critical organ was the urinary bladder wall, with a dose of 0.406 mGy/MBq. In patients with metastatic disease, tracer accumulation well above the background level was demonstrated in most identified sites of disease. Primary lesions were more variable in tracer accumulation. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-HER2-Nanobody PET/CT is a safe procedure with a radiation dose comparable to other routinely used PET tracers. Its biodistribution is favorable, with the highest uptake in the kidneys, liver, and intestines but very low background levels in all other organs that typically house primary breast carcinoma or tumor metastasis. Tracer accumulation in HER2-positive metastases is high, compared with normal surrounding tissues, and warrants further assessment in a phase II trial.

A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer
Cited by 240

A major challenge in value-based health care is the lack of standardized health outcomes measurements, hindering optimal monitoring and comparison of the quality of health care across different settings globally. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled a multidisciplinary international working group, comprised of 26 health care providers and patient advocates, to develop a standard set of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer (BC). The working group convened via 8 teleconferences and completed a follow-up survey after each meeting. A modified 2-round Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on the outcomes and case-mix variables to be included. Patient focus group meetings (8 early or metastatic BC patients) and online anonymized surveys of 1225 multinational BC patients and survivors were also conducted to obtain patients' input. The standard set encompasses survival and cancer control, and disutility of care (eg, acute treatment complications) outcomes, to be collected through administrative data and/or clinical records. A combination of multiple patient-reported outcomes measurement (PROM) tools is recommended to capture long-term degree of health outcomes. Selected case-mix factors were recommended to be collected at baseline. The ICHOM will endeavor to achieve wide buy-in of this set and facilitate its implementation in routine clinical practice in various settings and institutions worldwide.

Phase I Trial of <sup>131</sup>I-GMIB-Anti-HER2-VHH1, a New Promising Candidate for HER2-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients
Matthias D’Huyvetter, Jens De Vos, Vicky Caveliers et al.|Journal of Nuclear Medicine|2020
Cited by 123Open Access

I-GMIB-anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-VHH1 is a targeted radionuclide theranostic agent directed at HER2-expressing cancers. VHH1 is a single-domain antibody covalently linked to therapeutic 131 I via the linker N-succinimidyl 4-guanidino-methyl-3-iodobenzoate (SGMIB). The phase I study was aimed at evaluating the safety, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and tumorimaging potential of 131 I-GMIB-anti-HER2-VHH1 in healthy volunteers and breast cancer patients. Methods: In a first cohort, 6 healthy volunteers were included. The biodistribution of 131 I-GMIB-anti-HER2-VHH1 was assessed using whole-body (anterior and posterior) planar images obtained at 40 min and at 2, 4, 24, and 72 h after intravenously administered (38 6 9 MBq) 131 I-GMIB-anti-HER2-VHH1. Imaging data were analyzed using OLINDA/EXM software to determine the dosimetry. Blood and urine samples were obtained over 72 h. In the second cohort, 3 patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer were included. Planar whole-body imaging was performed at 2 and 24 h after injection. Additional SPECT/CT images were obtained after the whole-body images at 2 and 24 h if there was relevant uptake in known cancer lesions. Results: No drug-related adverse events were observed throughout the study. The biologic half-life of 131 I-GMIBanti-HER2-VHH1 in healthy subjects was about 8 h. After intravenous administration, the compound was eliminated from the blood with a 2.5-h half-life. The drug was eliminated primarily via the kidneys. The drug was stable in circulation, and there was no increased accumulation in the thyroid or stomach. The absorbed dose to the kidneys was 1.54 6 0.25 mGy/MBq, and to bone marrow it was 0.03 6 0.01 mGy/ MBq. SPECT/CT imaging in patients with advanced breast cancer showed focal uptake of 131 I-GMIB-anti-HER2-VHH1 in metastatic lesions. Conclusion: Because of its favorable toxicity profile and its uptake in HER2-positive lesions, this radiopharmaceutical can offer new therapeutic options to patients who have progressed on trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or trastuzmab emtansine, given its difference in mode-of-action. A dose escalation is planned in a subsequent phase I/II study to assess the therapeutic window of this compound (NCT04467515).