M.E. Michel‐Beyerle

This is the report of a DOE-sponsored workshop organized to discuss the status of our understanding of charge-transfer processes on the nanoscale and to identify research and other needs for progress in nanoscience and nanotechnology. The current status of basic electron-transfer research, both theoretical and experimental, is addressed, with emphasis on the distance-dependent measurements, and we have attempted to integrate terminology and notation of solution electron-transfer kinetics with that of conductance analysis. The interface between molecules or nanoparticles and bulk metals is examined, and new research tools that advance description and understanding of the interface are presented. The present state-of-the-art in molecular electronics efforts is summarized along with future research needs. Finally, novel strategies that exploit nanoscale architectures are presented for enhancing the efficiences of energy conversion based on photochemistry, catalysis, and electrocatalysis principles.

We explore charge migration in DNA, advancing two distinct mechanisms of charge separation in a donor (d)-bridge ([Bj])-acceptor (a) system, where [Bj] = B1,B2, . , BN are the N-specific adjacent bases of B-DNA: (i) two-center unistep superexchange induced charge transfer, d*[Bj]a --> d[Bj]a+/-, and (ii) multistep charge transport involves charge injection from d* (or d+) to [Bj], charge hopping within [Bj], and charge trapping by a. For off-resonance coupling, mechanism i prevails with the charge separation rate and yield exhibiting an exponential dependence approximately exp(-betaR) on the d-a distance (R). Resonance coupling results in mechanism ii with the charge separation lifetime tau approximately Neta and yield Y approximately (1 + Neta)-1 exhibiting a weak (algebraic) N and distance dependence. The power parameter eta is determined by charge hopping random walk. Energetic control of the charge migration mechanism is exerted by the energetics of the ion pair state dB1+/-B2 . BNa relative to the electronically excited donor doorway state d*B1B2 . BNa. The realization of charge separation via superexchange or hopping is determined by the base sequence within the bridge. Our energetic-dynamic relations, in conjunction with the energetic data for d*/d- and for B/B+, determine the realization of the two distinct mechanisms in different hole donor systems, establishing the conditions for "chemistry at a distance" after charge transport in DNA. The energetic control of the charge migration mechanisms attained by the sequence specificity of the bridge is universal for large molecular-scale systems, for proteins, and for DNA.

A guanine radical cation (G+•) was site-selectively generated in double stranded DNA and the charge transfer in different oligonucleotide sequences was investigated. The method is based on the competition between a charge transfer from G+• through the DNA and its trapping reaction with H2O. We analyzed the hole transfer from this G+• to a GGG unit through one, two, three, and four AT base pairs and found that the rate decreases by about 1 order of magnitude with each intervening AT base pair. This strong distance dependence led to a β-value of 0.7 ± 0.1 Å-1. Within the time scale of this assay the charge transfer nearly vanished when the G+• was separated by four AT base pairs from the GGG unit. However, if the second or the third of the four intervening AT base pairs was exchanged by a GC base pair, the rate of the hole transfer from the G+• to the GGG unit increased by 2 orders of magnitude. In addition, a long-range charge transfer over 15 base pairs could be observed in a mixed strand that contained AT as well as GC base pairs. Because G+• can oxidize G but not A bases, the long-range charge transport can be explained by a hopping of the positive charge between the intervening G bases. Thus, the overall charge transport in a mixed strand is a multistep hopping process between G bases where the individual steps contribute to the overall rate. The distance dependence is no longer described by the β value of the superexchange mechanism.

The fundamental mechanisms of charge migration in DNA are pertinent for current developments in molecular electronics and electrochemistry-based chip technology. The energetic control of hole (positive ion) multistep hopping transport in DNA proceeds via the guanine, the nucleobase with the lowest oxidation potential. Chemical yield data for the relative reactivity of the guanine cations and of charge trapping by a triple guanine unit in one of the strands quantify the hopping, trapping, and chemical kinetic parameters. The hole-hopping rate for superexchange-mediated interactions via two intervening AT base pairs is estimated to be 10(9) s(-1) at 300 K. We infer that the maximal distance for hole hopping in the duplex with the guanine separated by a single AT base pair is 300 +/- 70 A. Although we encounter constraints for hole transport in DNA emerging from the number of the mediating AT base pairs, electron transport is expected to be nearly sequence independent because of the similarity of the reduction potentials of the thymine and of the cytosine.

Nature Communications 6: Article number: 8903 (2015); Published: 30 July 2015; Updated: 10 March 2016 This article contains errors in the units used for carrier mobility. In Fig. 2a–d, the units on the y axis should be ‘cm2V−1s−1’ not ‘V−1s−1cm−1’. Similarly, the second and third sentences of the second paragraph of the ‘Quantum yield calculation’ section should read ‘From Fig.