E

Edward Littleton

Temple College

Publishes on Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery. 40 papers and 4.1k citations.

40Publications
4.1kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Aquaporin-4 Antibodies in Neuromyelitis Optica and Longitudinally Extensive Transverse Myelitis
Patrick Waters, Sven Jarius, Edward Littleton et al.|Archives of Neurology|2008
Cited by 292

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of antibody-mediated immunotherapy-responsive neurologic diseases and a need for appropriate immunoassays. OBJECTIVES: To develop a clinically applicable quantitative assay to detect the presence of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies in patients with neuromyelitis optica and to characterize the anti-AQP4 antibodies. DESIGN: We compared a simple new quantitative fluorescence immunoprecipitation assay (FIPA) with both indirect immunofluorescence and an AQP4-transfected cell-based assay, both previously described. We used the cell-based assay to characterize the antibodies for their immunoglobulin class, IgG subclass, and ability to induce complement C3b deposition in vitro. SETTING: United Kingdom and Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Serum samples from patients with neuromyelitis optica (n = 25) or longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (n = 11) and from relevant controls (n = 78) were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of different assays for AQP4 antibodies and characterization of anti-AQP4 antibodies in patients with neuromyelitis optica. RESULTS: We found antibodies to AQP4 in 19 of 25 patients with neuromyelitis optica (76%) using FIPA, in 20 of 25 patients with neuromyelitis optica (80%) using the cell-based assay, and in 6 of 11 patients with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (55%) with both assays; these assays were more sensitive than indirect immunofluorescence and 100% specific. The antibodies bound to extracellular epitope(s) of AQP4, were predominantly IgG1, and strongly induced C3b deposition. CONCLUSIONS: Aquaporin-4 is a major antigen in neuromyelitis optica, and antibodies can be detected in more than 75% of patients. Further studies on larger samples will show whether this novel FIPA is suitable for clinical use. The IgG1 antibodies bind to AQP4 on the cell surface and can initiate complement deposition. These approaches will be useful for investigation of other antibody-mediated diseases.

Antibody to Aquaporin 4 in the Diagnosis of Neuromyelitis Optica
Friedemann Paul, Sven Jarius, Orhan Aktaş et al.|PLoS Medicine|2007
Cited by 208Open Access

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) of putative autoimmune aetiology. Early discrimination between multiple sclerosis (MS) and NMO is important, as optimum treatment for both diseases may differ considerably. Recently, using indirect immunofluorescence analysis, a new serum autoantibody (NMO-IgG) has been detected in NMO patients. The binding sites of this autoantibody were reported to colocalize with aquaporin 4 (AQP4) water channels. Thus we hypothesized that AQP4 antibodies in fact characterize NMO patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Based on these observations we cloned human water channel AQP4, expressed the protein in a eukaryotic transcription/translation system, and employed the recombinant AQP4 to establish a new radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA). Indeed, application of this RIPA showed that antibodies against AQP4 exist in the majority of patients with NMO (n = 37; 21 positive) as well as in patients with isolated longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (n = 6; six positive), corresponding to a sensitivity of 62.8% and a specificity of 98.3%. By contrast, AQP4 antibodies were virtually absent in 291 other participants, which included patients with MS (n = 144; four positive), patients with other inflammatory and noninflammatory neurological diseases (n = 73; one positive), patients with systemic autoimmune diseases (n = 45; 0 positive), and healthy participants (n = 29; 0 positive). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series reported so far to our knowledge, we quantified AQP4 antibodies in patients with NMO versus various other diseases, and showed that the aquaporin 4 water channel is a target antigen in a majority of patients with NMO. The newly developed assay represents a highly specific, observer-independent, and easily reproducible detection method facilitating clinically relevant discrimination between NMO, MS, and other inflammatory diseases.

NMO-IgG in the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica
Cited by 182

Recently, a newly detected serum autoantibody (called NMO-IgG) has been reported to distinguish between neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and multiple sclerosis (MS),1 and revised diagnostic criteria for NMO giving a crucial role to this antibody have been suggested.2 This proposal has important clinical implications and therefore demands independent confirmation. We studied 36 unselected patients with NMO (33 relapsing, three monophasic). All patients met the 1999 criteria of Wingerchuk et al.3 Spinal cord lesions in three or more segments were present in 35 of 36. Median follow-up from onset was 38 months. In addition, we tested 80 patients with MS according to the revised McDonald criteria4 (71% relapsing-remitting, 20% secondary progressive, 9% primary progressive), five patients with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM),1,5 11 patients with non-LETM myelitis, 21 with miscellaneous neurologic disorders, and 25 healthy controls. NMO-IgG was detected by indirect immunofluorescence.1 Briefly, adult mouse cerebellum cryosections (10 μm) were incubated with 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for 4 minutes. After three washes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), detergent (1% CHAPS in PBS) was applied for 4 minutes. After …

AChR phosphorylation and indirect inhibition of AChR function in seronegative MG
Cited by 66

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with autoimmune MG do not have antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), so-called seronegative MG (SNMG). IgG antibodies from up to 70% of SNMG patients bind to the muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase, MuSK. The plasmas and non-IgG fractions from SNMG patients (and some with AChR antibodies) also contain a factor, perhaps an IgM antibody, that inhibits AChR function, but it is not clear how this factor acts and whether it is related to the MuSK IgG antibodies. METHODS: The authors studied 12 unselected SNMG plasmas and their non-IgG fractions; seven were positive for MuSK IgG antibodies. Ion flux assays, electrophysiology, phosphorylation, and kinase assays were used to look at mechanisms of action. RESULTS: Eight of the 12 plasmas and their non-IgG fractions inhibited AChR function, but the inhibitory activity was transient and did not correlate with the presence of MuSK IgG antibodies. Two of three plasmas added outside of a cell-attached patch pipette inhibited AChR function within the patch, and these two plasmas also increased AChR phosphorylation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose that a plasma factor(s) in SNMG patients, distinct from MuSK IgG antibodies, binds to a muscle membrane receptor and activates a second messenger pathway leading to AChR phosphorylation and reduced AChR function. Identifying the target for this factor should lead to improved diagnosis of MG in MuSK antibody-negative patients and may provide new insights into the function of the neuromuscular junction and pathophysiological mechanisms in MG.