Agnès Certain

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as a first-line monotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (SCCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received cetuximab (initial dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m(2)) for at least 6 weeks with a 48-week follow-up. The primary end point was the disease control rate (DCR) at 6 weeks (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] criteria). Secondary end points included best response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity assessment. Association of treatment efficacy with RAS mutations or FcγR genotypes was investigated. RESULTS: Median age of the study population was 79 years. DCR at 6 weeks was obtained in 25 of 36 patients (69%; 95% CI, 52% to 84%) of the intention-to-treat population. The best responses were eight partial responses and two complete responses. There were no cetuximab-related deaths. There were three related serious adverse events: two grade 4 infusion reactions and one grade 3 interstitial pneumopathy. Grade 1 to 2 acne-like rash occurred in 78% of patients and was associated with prolonged PFS. One HRAS mutation was identified. Combined FcγRIIa-131H/H and/or FcγRIIIa-158V/V polymorphisms were not associated with the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: As a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable SCCS, cetuximab achieved 69% DCR. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to confirm that cetuximab may be considered as a therapeutic option especially in elderly patients. The low frequency of RAS mutations in SCCS makes SCCS tumors attractive for EGFR inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and toxoplasmic encephalitis are frequent life-threatening opportunistic infections in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Primary prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia is now common, but there are few data on regimens for primary prophylaxis against toxoplasmosis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial that compared two prophylactic regimens: dapsone (50 mg per day) plus pyrimethamine (50 mg per week) was compared with aerosolized pentamidine (300 mg per month). The patients had symptomatic HIV infection, no history of P. carinii pneumonia or symptomatic toxoplasmosis, and CD4+ counts below 200 per cubic millimeter (0.2 x 10(9) per liter). RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, after a median follow-up of 539 days P. carinii pneumonia developed in 10 patients in each group, whereas toxoplasmosis developed in 32 of 176 patients in the pentamidine group and 19 of 173 patients in the dapsone-pyrimethamine group. Those assigned to pentamidine had a risk of P. carinii pneumonia that was similar to the risk in those assigned to dapsone-pyrimethamine (adjusted relative risk, 1.13; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.44 to 2.92; P = 0.79), but a higher risk of toxoplasmosis (adjusted relative risk, 1.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.12 to 2.94; P = 0.02). Among the 262 patients with serologic evidence of past exposure to Toxoplasma gondii, the relative risk of symptomatic toxoplasmosis was 2.37 times higher in those assigned to pentamidine (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.4; P = 0.006). More patients discontinued dapsone-pyrimethamine than pentamidine because of toxicity (42 vs. 3; P < 0.001). Survival was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For primary prevention of P. carinii pneumonia, dapsone-pyrimethamine is as effective, though not as well tolerated, as aerosolized pentamidine. Dapsone-pyrimethamine also prevents first episodes of toxoplasmosis.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we first assessed costs associated with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in an infectious diseases University Hospital Clinic; second, we evaluated characteristics associated with these costs and finally simulated the impact on the overall ART budget of switching first-line and second-line regimens to less-costly regimens (as effective and well tolerated). DESIGN: Cohort analysis including persons living with HIV (PLHIV) aged at least 18 years on ART to estimate ART costs during 2014. METHODS: The current study was conducted in the Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital Clinic in Paris, France, where 4501 PLHIV consulted in 2014. We used the medical database Nadis to describe patients' ART, characteristics and estimated costs. When assessing the budgetary impact of potential switches, we considered patients' history of failure, CD4 cell count, plasma viral load, resistance mutations, hepatitis B surface antigen or HLAB5701 profile. RESULTS: A total of 4238 of 4501 patients were on ART (94%). The total annual cost of ART prescribed was estimated at &OV0556;48 280 200 in 2014; first/second (simplification)-line regimens represented 25% (1076/4238) of the treated PLHIV and 23% (&OV0556;11 209 000) of the annual cost. For these PLHIV, we considered switches from the most common ART regimens (protease inhibitor boosted by ritonavir or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor + two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) to less-expensive regimens. We found savings ranging from &OV0556;36 100 to 1472 600/year. Savings were the highest when we considered switching to generic-based regimens or from protease inhibitor-based triple therapy to protease inhibitor monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Costs associated with ART prescriptions are very high. Switches to generic-based regimens are associated with large savings. However, those targeting protease inhibitor regimens are also associated with substantial savings and should be considered.

Pentamidine concentrations were determined in plasma after a single aerosolization of 4 mg/kg pentamidine base on 18 patients breathing spontaneously (Group I) and in eight patients receiving mechanical ventilation (Group II). All the patients had documented pneumocystosis. Large interindividual variations in concentrations appeared, especially in Group I. Low concentrations were observed in Group I: Cmax = 65.6 +/- 9.4 micrograms/L (mean +/- SEM), contrasting with high levels in Group II: Cmax = 215.8 +/- 49.8 micrograms/L (mean +/- SEM). Consequently, the mean area under the curve from zero to 4 h was 2.6-fold higher in Group II than in Group I. These findings underline the risk of dose-related pentamidine toxicity in ventilated patients treated with aerosolized pentamidine and the interest of plasma pentamidine monitoring.

We compared the efficacy and the toxicity of zidovudine (AZT) versus stavudine (d4T), in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir, in AZT-, dideoxyinosine (ddI)-, and/or dideoxycytosine (ddC)-experienced patients in a randomized comparative multicenter trial. One hundred seventy human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, who had received AZT, ddI, and/or ddC for at least 6 months but were naive for d4T, 3TC, and protease inhibitors, were randomized to AZT at 250 to 300 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h or to d4T at 40 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h. The primary endpoint was time to virological failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of >5,000 copies/ml after at least 8 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Additional endpoints were change from baseline in CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events and adverse events, and proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml and HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml. At week 80, 15 patients in the AZT arm and 14 patients in the d4T arm had reached the primary endpoint, and time to virological failure did not differ between the two arms (P = 0.98). In the d4T and in the AZT arms, 67 and 73% of patients, respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml (P = 0.50). The median change from baseline in CD4 cell count was 195 x 10(6) and 175 x 10(6)/liter for the d4T- and AZT-containing arms, respectively. The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml at weeks 8, 16, and 24 were similar in the two arms. The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. In conclusion, in these patients heavily pretreated with AZT, switching from AZT to d4T when initiating indinavir and 3TC did not bring any additional benefit compared to maintaining AZT.