Ashok Gunawardene

With over thirty different hormones identified as being produced in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the gut has been described as 'the largest endocrine organ in the body' (Ann. Oncol., 12, 2003, S63). The classification of these hormones and the cells that produce them, the enteroendocrine cells (EECs), has provided the foundation for digestive physiology. Furthermore, alterations in the composition and function of EEC may influence digestive physiology and thereby associate with GI pathologies. Whilst there is a rapidly increasing body of data on the role and function of EEC in the upper GI tract, there is a less clear-cut understanding of the function of EEC in the lower GI. Nonetheless, their presence and diversity are indicative of a role. This review focuses on the EECs of the lower GI where new evidence also suggests a possible relationship with the development and progression of primary adenocarcinoma.

Temporal artery biopsy is considered the gold standard investigation of giant cell arteritis and is recommended in suspected cases despite a sensitivity of 81-91%. This review highlights the potential risk of facial nerve injury during temporal artery biopsy and introduces recent advances in the emerging role of imaging modalities. When these non-invasive techniques are used in conjunction with American College of Rheumatology scoring, which includes clinical features and biochemical test results, temporal artery biopsy may be avoided in selected cases.

The link between inflammation and outcome has been established in colorectal cancer through experimental evidence demonstrating an influential role of pro-inflammatory cytokines on tumour growth and progression. Furthermore, prognostic scores based on overall markers of systemic inflammation such as C-reactive protein and neutrophil count have been validated. Over recent years, an increasing number of inflammatory cytokines have been identified as prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer and the aim of this review was to evaluate the literature on the prognostic value of multiple cytokine measurement. The English language literature published since the year 2000 was searched using terms including, 'colorectal cancer', 'cytokines' and 'prognosis' through Medline, Embase and Scopus databases. Reports were screened by two independent reviewers and studies evaluating fewer than three cytokines were excluded. Quality assessments were performed in six domains before data extraction was undertaken in duplicate. Seven studies were found to evaluate multiple cytokines after 570 records were screened. The quality of these studies ranged from poor to moderate and were heterogeneous in terms of the patient population and the number and selection of cytokines tested. Four studies combined multiple cytokine levels into a single score and found them to be predictive of prognosis whereas the association between individual cytokines and outcome was not demonstrated consistently. The combination of multiple cytokine markers into a single prognostic score shows promise in colorectal cancer and further research is required to establish and validate such a score.

AIM: To describe the patterns of recurrence in a contemporaneous cohort of patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for colorectal adenocarcinoma at a New Zealand hospital with five-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer undergoing potentially curative surgery between January 2010 and December 2012 were followed up for a median of 61 months with three-monthly CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen), a colonoscopy after one year and yearly computed tomography scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis for the first three years. RESULTS: Overall, 59/237 (24.9%) of patients experienced disease recurrence, the most common sites being the liver, followed by the lung and local recurrence. Recurrence rates did not differ significantly between colon and rectal cancer and ranged from 5.1% in stage I to 60% in stage IV. Seventy-three percent of all recurrences were observed within the first 24 months post-operatively. CONCLUSION: While New Zealand outcomes in colorectal cancer have historically compared unfavourably against international standards, the outcomes observed in this cohort are encouraging and may reflect advances in care, including multidisciplinary team discussion, increased use of adjuvant therapy, surgical subspecialisation and protocolled surveillance and follow-up.