Aalok Kacha

Despite lack of tumor control in many models, spontaneous T cell priming occurs frequently in response to a growing tumor. However, the innate immune mechanisms that promote natural antitumor T cell responses are undefined. In human metastatic melanoma, there was a correlation between a type I interferon (IFN) transcriptional profile and T cell markers in metastatic tumor tissue. In mice, IFN-β was produced by CD11c(+) cells after tumor implantation, and tumor-induced T cell priming was defective in mice lacking IFN-α/βR or Stat1. IFN signaling was required in the hematopoietic compartment at the level of host antigen-presenting cells, and selectively for intratumoral accumulation of CD8α(+) dendritic cells, which were demonstrated to be essential using Batf3(-/-) mice. Thus, host type I IFNs are critical for the innate immune recognition of a growing tumor through signaling on CD8α(+) DCs.

It is now little disputed that most if not all cancer cells express antigens that can be recognized by specific CD8(+) T lymphocytes. However, a central question in the field of anti-tumor immunity is why such antigen-expressing tumors are not spontaneously eliminated by the immune system. While in some cases, this lack of rejection may be due to immunologic ignorance, induction of anti-tumor T-cell responses in many patients has been detected in the peripheral blood, either spontaneously or in response to vaccination, without accompanying tumor rejection. These observations argue for the importance of barriers downstream from initial T-cell priming that need to be addressed to translate immune responses into clinical tumor regression. Recent data suggest that the proper trafficking of effector T cells into the tumor microenvironment may not always occur. T cells that do effectively home to tumor metastases are often found to be dysfunctional, pointing toward immunosuppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment. T-cell anergy due to insufficient B7 costimulation, extrinsic suppression by regulatory cell populations, inhibition by ligands such as programmed death ligand-1, metabolic dysregulation by enzymes such as indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, and the action of soluble inhibitory factors such as transforming growth factor-beta have all been clearly implicated in generating this suppressive microenvironment. Identification of these downstream processes points to new therapeutic targets that should be manipulated to facilitate the effector phase of anti-tumor immune responses in concert with vaccination or T-cell adoptive transfer.

Although recent work has suggested that lymphopenia-induced homeostatic proliferation may improve T cell-mediated tumor rejection, there is little direct evidence isolating homeostatic proliferation as an experimental variable, and the mechanism by which improved antitumor immunity occurs via homeostatic proliferation is poorly understood. An adoptive transfer model was developed in which tumor-specific 2C/RAG2(-/-) TCR transgenic CD8+ T cells were introduced either into the lymphopenic environment of RAG2(-/-) mice or into P14/RAG2(-/-) mice containing an irrelevant CD8+ TCR transgenic population. RAG2(-/-), but not P14/RAG2(-/-) recipients supported homeostatic proliferation of transferred T cells as well as tumor rejection. Despite absence of tumor rejection in P14/RAG2(-/-) recipients, 2C cells did become activated, as reflected by CFSE dilution and CD44 up-regulation. However, these cells showed poor IFN-gamma and IL-2 production upon restimulation, consistent with T cell anergy and similar to the hyporesponsiveness induced by administration of soluble peptide Ag. To determine whether homeostatic proliferation could uncouple T cell anergy, anergic 2C cells were transferred into RAG(-/-) recipients, which resulted in vigorous homeostatic proliferation, recovery of IL-2 production, and acquisition of the ability to reject tumors. Taken together, our data suggest that a major mechanism by which homeostatic proliferation supports tumor rejection is by maintaining and/or re-establishing T cell responsiveness.

Experimental evidence suggests that a type 1 T cell response may result in optimal tumor rejection in vivo. This phenotype is determined in part by cytokines that influence T cell differentiation. In transplantable tumor models such as P1.HTR, tumors grow progressively despite expression of defined tumor Ags. We hypothesized that this failure to reject may be due to poor generation of a type 1 phenotype, through a dominant influence of the type 2-promoting cytokines IL-4 and/or IL-13. This hypothesis was tested by implanting P1.HTR tumors into mice deficient in Stat6. In contrast to progressive growth of P1.HTR tumors in wild-type mice, and aggressive growth even of IL-12-transfected P1.HTR in Stat1(-/-) mice, P1.HTR was spontaneously rejected by Stat6(-/-) mice. Rejection was accompanied by augmented tumor-specific IFN-gamma production and CTL activity. These results suggest that pharmacologic inhibition of Stat6 signaling could potentiate anti-tumor immunity in vivo.

ICAM-1 has been described to provide both adhesion and costimulatory functions during T cell activation. In the setting of antitumor immunity, ICAM-1/LFA-1 interactions could be important at the level of T cell priming by APCs in draining lymph nodes as well as for transendothelial migration and tumor cell recognition at the tumor site. To determine the contribution of ICAM-1 to tumor rejection in vivo, we performed adoptive transfer of 2C TCR-transgenic/RAG2(-/-) T cells into TCRalpha(-/-) vs ICAM(-/-)/TCRalpha(-/-) recipient animals. ICAM-1-deficient mice successfully rejected HTR.C tumors expressing Ld recognized by the 2C TCR, albeit with a kinetic delay. Inasmuch as HTR.C tumor cells themselves express ICAM-1, a second model was pursued using B16-F10 melanoma cells that lack ICAM-1 expression. These cells were transduced to express the SIYRYYGL peptide recognized by the 2C TCR in the context of Kb, which is cross-presented by APCs in H-2b mice in vivo. These tumors also grew more slowly but were eventually rejected by the majority of ICAM-1(-/-)/TCRalpha(-/-) recipients. Delayed rejection in ICAM-1(-/-) mice was associated with diminished T cell priming as assessed by ELISPOT. In contrast, T cell penetration into the tumor was comparable in wild-type and ICAM-1(-/-) hosts, and adoptively transferred primed effector 2C cells rejected normally in ICAM-1(-/-) recipients. Our results suggest that ICAM-1 contributes to but is not absolutely required for CD8+ T cell-mediated tumor rejection in vivo and dominantly acts at the level of priming rather than the effector phase of the antitumor immune response.