S

Sérgio Diniz Ferreira

Support group for adolescents and children with cancer

ORCID: 0000-0002-9830-2554

Publishes on Oral microbiology and periodontitis research, Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes, Oral and gingival health research. 20 papers and 1.4k citations.

20Publications
1.4kTotal Citations

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Add your photo, update your bio, and get notified when your ranking changes.

Top publicationsby citations

Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects
Sérgio Diniz Ferreira, G. L. M Silva, José Roberto Cortelli et al.|Journal Of Clinical Periodontology|2006
Cited by 553

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to verify the prevalence of peri-implant disease and analyse possible risk variables associated with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. The study group consisted of 212 partially edentulous subjects rehabilitated with osseointegrated implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The implants placed were examined clinically and radiographically to assess the peri-implant status. The degree of association between peri-implant disease and various independent variables was investigated using a multinomial regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis were 64.6% and 8.9%, respectively. In univariate modelling, healthy peri-implant subjects presented lower plaque scores, less periodontal bleeding on probing, and less time elapsed since placement of supra-structures. In multivariate analyses, the risk variables associated with increased odds for having peri-implant disease included: gender, plaque scores, and periodontal bleeding on probing. Presence of periodontitis and diabetes were statistically associated with increased risk of peri-implantitis. The only two factors, which did not contribute to the presence of the disease, were the time elapsed since placement of supra-structures and the frequency of visits for maintenance care. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that subjects with periodontitis, diabetes, and poor oral hygiene were more prone to develop peri-implantitis.

Peri‐implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5‐year follow‐up
Fernando Oliveira Costa, Satoshi Takenaka‐Martinez, Luís Otávio Miranda Cota et al.|Journal Of Clinical Periodontology|2011
Cited by 494

AIM: To determine the incidence of peri-implantitis in individuals with mucositis in a 5-year follow-up study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 212 partially edentulous individuals, rehabilitated with dental implants, underwent periodontal and peri-implant clinical examinations in 2005 (baseline). Five years later, 80 individuals who had been diagnosed with mucositis in the baseline examination were re-examined. These individuals were divided into two groups: one group with preventive maintenance during the study period (GTP; n = 39), and another group without preventive maintenance (GNTP; n = 41). The following parameters were clinically evaluated: plaque index, bleeding on periodontal and peri-implant probing, periodontal and peri-implant probing depth, suppuration and peri-implant bone loss. The influence of biological and behavioural risk variables associated with the occurrence of peri-implantitis was analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of peri-implantitis in the global sample was 31.2% (GNTP = 43.9% and GTP = 18.0%). CONCLUSION: The absence of preventive maintenance in individuals with pre-existing peri-implant mucositis was associated with a high incidence of peri-implantitis. Clinical parameters, such as bleeding on peri-implant probing, periodontal probing depth and the presence of periodontitis were associated with a higher risk of developing peri-implantitis.

Prevalence, Severity, and Risk Variables Associated With Gingival Overgrowth in Renal Transplant Subjects Treated Under Tacrolimus or Cyclosporin Regimens
Cited by 54

BACKGROUND: Some reports suggest that the prevalence and severity of gingival overgrowth (GO) is lower in patients taking tacrolimus (Tcr) than in those taking cyclosporin A (CsA). The present study was conducted to determine the prevalence and severity of GO in a group of renal transplant recipients treated with Tcr in comparison to those treated with CsA and to evaluate the risk variables associated with the development of GO in these two drug regimens. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a public hospital in Belo Horizonte City, Brazil. Demographic, pharmacological, and periodontal data were recorded for each subject. Variables from 134 subjects taking Tcr were compared to 451 subjects taking CsA using independent sample t, chi(2) statistic, or Mann-Whitney tests. The effects of potential risk factors on GO severity were determined using forward and backward stepwise regression analysis. RESULTS: Subjects taking CsA showed a higher mean GO score (29.03% +/- 22.9%) compared to subjects taking Tcr (16.9% +/- 3.4%) (P = 0.0038). In the Tcr group, 17.9% of the subjects had clinically significant GO compared to 38.1% in the CsA group (P = 0.045). In the multivariate final model, papillary bleeding index, azathioprine dosage, and concomitant use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) were significant variables associated with severity of GO in Tcr and CsA groups. In addition, previous CsA use also remained significant for GO in subjects under a Tcr regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and severity of GO is lower in transplant subjects taking Tcr compared to CsA. GO severity in both groups was strongly associated with the papillary bleeding index, highlighting the role of inflammation in this condition. Concomitant CCB use, azathioprine dosage, and previous CsA use in the Tcr group reinforces the possible synergistic effects of these pharmacological variables on GO severity.