Marc Joliot

Following a first version AAL of the automated anatomical labeling atlas (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002), a second version (AAL2) (Rolls et al., 2015) was developed that provided an alternative parcellation of the orbitofrontal cortex following the description provided by Chiavaras, Petrides, and colleagues. We now provide a third version, AAL3, which adds a number of brain areas not previously defined, but of interest in many neuroimaging investigations. The 26 new areas in the third version are subdivision of the anterior cingulate cortex into subgenual, pregenual and supracallosal parts; subdivision of the thalamus into 15 parts; the nucleus accumbens, substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, red nucleus, locus coeruleus, and raphe nuclei. The new atlas is available as a toolbox for SPM, and can be used with MRIcron.

Spontaneous oscillatory electrical activity at a frequency near 40 Hz in the human brain and its reset by sensory stimulation have been proposed to be related to cognitive processing and to the temporal binding of sensory stimuli. These experiments were designed to test this hypothesis and to determine specifically whether the minimal interval required to identify separate auditory stimuli correlates with the reset of the 40-Hz magnetic signal. Auditory clicks were presented at varying times, while magnetic activity was recorded from awake human subjects. Experimental and modeling results indicate a stimulus-interval-dependent response with a critical interval of 12-15 ms. At shorter intervals only one 40-Hz response, to the first stimulus, was observed. With longer intervals, a second 40-Hz wave abruptly appeared, which coincided with the subject's perception of a second distinct auditory stimulus. These results indicate that oscillatory activity near 40 Hz represents a neurophysiological correlate to the temporal processing of auditory stimuli. It also supports the view that 40-Hz activity not only relates to primary sensory processing, but also could reflect the temporal binding underlying cognition.

Hemispheric lateralization for language production and its relationships with manual preference and manual preference strength were studied in a sample of 297 subjects, including 153 left-handers (LH). A hemispheric functional lateralization index (HFLI) for language was derived from fMRI acquired during a covert sentence generation task as compared with a covert word list recitation. The multimodal HFLI distribution was optimally modeled using a mixture of 3 and 4 Gaussian functions in right-handers (RH) and LH, respectively. Gaussian function parameters helped to define 3 types of language hemispheric lateralization, namely "Typical" (left hemisphere dominance with clear positive HFLI values, 88% of RH, 78% of LH), "Ambilateral" (no dominant hemisphere with HFLI values close to 0, 12% of RH, 15% of LH) and "Strongly-atypical" (right-hemisphere dominance with clear negative HFLI values, 7% of LH). Concordance between dominant hemispheres for hand and for language did not exceed chance level, and most of the association between handedness and language lateralization was explained by the fact that all Strongly-atypical individuals were left-handed. Similarly, most of the relationship between language lateralization and manual preference strength was explained by the fact that Strongly-atypical individuals exhibited a strong preference for their left hand. These results indicate that concordance of hemispheric dominance for hand and for language occurs barely above the chance level, except in a group of rare individuals (less than 1% in the general population) who exhibit strong right hemisphere dominance for both language and their preferred hand. They call for a revisit of models hypothesizing common determinants for handedness and for language dominance.