Lucas Vieira dos Santos

BACKGROUND: The addition of neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) antagonists to antiemetic regimens has substantially reduced chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). We sought to systematically review the overall impact of NK1R antagonists on CINV prevention. METHODS: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, and meeting proceedings for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated NK1R antagonists plus standard antiemetic therapy for CINV prevention. Complete response (CR) to therapy was defined as the absence of emesis and the absence of rescue therapy. The endpoints were defined as CR in the overall phase (during the first 120 hours of chemotherapy), CR in the acute phase (first 24 hours), and the delayed phase (24-120 hours) after chemotherapy, nausea, and toxicity. Subgroup analyses evaluated the type of NK1R antagonist used, the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy regimen, and prolonged use of 5-HT3 (serotonin) receptor antagonists, a class of standard antiemetic agents. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical tests for heterogeneity were one-sided; statistical tests for effect estimates and publication bias were two-sided. RESULTS: Seventeen trials (8740 patients) were included in this analysis. NK1R antagonists increased the CR rate in the overall phase from 54% to 72% (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.57, P < .001). CR and nausea were improved in all phases and subgroups. The expected side effects from NK1R antagonists did not statistically significantly differ from previous reports; however, this analysis suggests that the incidence of severe infection increased from 2% to 6% in the NK1R antagonist group (three RCTs with a total of 1480 patients; OR = 3.10; 95% CI = 1.69 to 5.67, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: NK1R antagonists increased CINV control in the acute, delayed, and overall phases. They are effective for both moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Their use might be associated with increased infection rates; however, additional appraisal of specific data from RCTs is needed.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) dysregulation is associated with tumorigenesis in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer; however, the number of patients with HER2-positive disease is unclear, possibly due to differing scoring criteria/assays. Data are also lacking for early disease. We aimed to assess the HER2-positivity rate using approved testing criteria in a large, real-life multinational population. HER2-positivity was defined as an immunohistochemistry staining score of 3+, or immunohistochemistry 2+ and HER2 amplification detected by in situ hybridization. A total of 4949 patients were enrolled and results showed that 14.2% of 4920 samples with immunohistochemistry results were HER2-positive. HER2-positivity was significantly higher in males (16.1% vs. 9.6% in females), in gastroesophageal versus stomach tumors (22.1% vs. 12.9%), in biopsy versus surgical samples (18.3% vs. 13.0%), in intestinal tumor subtypes versus diffuse (21.5% vs. 4.8%) and mixed types (21.5% vs. 8.5%) (P<0.001), in mixed versus diffuse types (8.5% vs. 4.8%), and in "other" versus diffuse types (11.7% vs. 4.8%; P=0.002). There were no significant differences between stages. Patients in the youngest age percentile had significantly lower HER2-positivity rates than patients in the remaining percentiles (9.2% vs. 15.9%, 15.7%, and 15.1%; P<0.001). HER2-positivity was highest in France (20.2%) and lowest in Hong Kong (10.4%). In conclusion, HER-EAGLE, the first study of its kind to be conducted in a large, multinational population of almost 5000 patients, gives valuable insights into the real-world HER2-positivity rate in a gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer patient population not selected for disease stage or histology.