Steven Fishbane

BACKGROUND: Anemia, a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), has previously been attributed primarily to decreased production of erythropoietin. More recently, it has become apparent that the etiology of anemia involves several other factors, most notably dysfunctional iron metabolism, mediated via increased hepcidin activity and reduced clearance. Current management of anemia in patients with advanced CKD is based on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and iron supplementation, along with red blood cell transfusions when necessary; however, safety considerations associated with these therapies highlight the need to pursue alternative treatment options targeting other mechanisms such as hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) that act as central regulators of erythropoiesis by coordinating a series of graded hypoxic responses. SUMMARY: This review discusses the discovery of the HIF pathway and its regulation via HIF prolyl hydroxylase enzymes in the context of erythropoiesis and iron metabolism. The rationale for targeting this pathway and the clinical development of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are reviewed, with a commentary on the potential implications of this class of agents in CKD anemia management. Key Messages: Pharmacologic activation of the HIF pathway results in a transient pseudo-hypoxic state that stimulates erythropoiesis in CKD patients with anemia. Results from clinical studies of a number of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are increasingly available and provide support for the continued evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio of this novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of anemia in CKD.

Before the introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in 1989, repeated transfusions given to patients with end-stage renal disease caused iron overload, and the need for supplemental iron was rare. However, with the widespread introduction of ESAs, it was recognized that supplemental iron was necessary to optimize hemoglobin response and allow reduction of the ESA dose for economic reasons and recent concerns about ESA safety. Iron supplementation was also found to be more efficacious via intravenous compared to oral administration, and the use of intravenous iron has escalated in recent years. The safety of various iron compounds has been of theoretical concern due to their potential to induce iron overload, oxidative stress, hypersensitivity reactions, and a permissive environment for infectious processes. Therefore, an expert group was convened to assess the benefits and risks of parenteral iron, and to provide strategies for its optimal use while mitigating the risk for acute reactions and other adverse effects.

We have compared the efficacy of oral to intravenous iron for the chronic maintenance of iron stores in hemodialysis patients. Fifty-two hemodialysis patients with initial serum ferritin greater than 100 ng/mL and transferrin saturation greater than 15% were randomly assigned to one of two groups: those receiving oral iron therapy (n = 32) and those receiving intravenous iron dextran (100 mg twice weekly) (n = 20). At study completion (4 months), the mean hematocrit was significantly higher in the intravenous group than in the oral iron group (34.4% ± 0.7% v 31.8% ± 0.4%, respectively; P < 0.05), the final mean recombinant human erythropoietin dose was 46% lower in the intravenous iron group than in the oral group (4,050 ± 634 U/treatment v 7,563 ± 378 U/ treatment; P < 0.05), and the mean serum ferritin was significantly higher in the intravenous group than in the oral iron group (753.9 ± 30.2 ng/mL v 157.3 ± 15.4 ng/mL, respectively; P < 0.05). We have found that administering iron intravenously instead of orally for chronic maintenance iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients resulted in improved erythropoiesis. We hypothesize that most hemodialysis patients have inadequate iron stores for optimal erythropoiesis when currently recommended levels of ferritin and transferrin saturation are used to guide therapy, and that the chronic use of intravenous iron could reduce recombinant human erythropoietin requirements by maximizing iron stores. The improvement in erythropoiesis was accompanied, however, by an increase in iron indices to levels that could be indicative of tissue iron overload. Future studies must be performed to determine whether lower doses of intravenous iron dextran would improve erythropoiesis without causing potential organ iron overload.