Rajat Mohindra

Most new cancer diagnoses occur in patients over the age of 65. The composition and function of the immune system changes with age, but how the aged immune system affects responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer therapies remains incompletely understood. Here, using multiplex cytokine assay and high-parameter mass cytometry, we analyze prospectively collected blood samples from 104 cancer patients receiving ICIs. We find aged patients ( ≥ 65-years-old; n = 54) derive similar clinical outcomes as younger patients (n = 50). However, aged, compared to young, patients have divergent immune phenotypes at baseline that persist during ICI therapy, including diminished cytokine responses, reduced pools of naïve T cells with increased relative expression of immune checkpoint molecules, and more robust effector T cell expansion in responders compared to non-responders. Our study provides insights into age-stratified mechanisms of ICI effects while also implying the utility of age-tailored immunotherapeutic approaches.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer patients in the last decade, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose significant clinical challenges. Despite advances in the management of these unique toxicities, there remains an unmet need to further characterize the patient-level drivers of irAEs in order to optimize the benefit/risk balance in patients receiving cancer immunotherapy. Methods An individual-patient data post-hoc meta-analysis was performed using data from 10,344 patients across 15 Roche sponsored clinical trials with atezolizumab in five different solid tumor types to assess the association between baseline risk factors and the time to onset of irAE. In this study, the overall analysis was conducted by treatment arm, indication, toxicity grade and irAE type, and the study design considered confounder adjustment to assess potential differences in risk factor profiles. Results This analysis demonstrates that the safety profile of atezolizumab is generally consistent across indications in the 15 studies evaluated. In addition, our findings corroborate with prior reviews which suggest that reported rates of irAEs with PD-(L)1 inhibitors are nominally lower than CTLA-4 inhibitors. In our analysis, there were no remarkable differences in the distribution of toxicity grades between indications, but some indication-specific differences regarding the type of irAE were seen across treatment arms, where pneumonitis mainly occurred in lung cancer, and hypothyroidism and rash had a higher prevalence in advanced renal cell carcinoma compared to all other indications. Results showed consistency of risk factors across indications and by toxicity grade. The strongest and most consistent risk factors were mostly organ-specific such as elevated liver enzymes for hepatitis and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) for thyroid toxicities. Another strong but non-organ-specific risk factor was ethnicity, which was associated with rash, hepatitis and pneumonitis. Further understanding the impact of ethnicity on ICI associated irAEs is considered as an area for future research. Conclusions Overall, this analysis demonstrated that atezolizumab safety profile is consistent across indications, is clinically distinguishable from comparator regimens without checkpoint inhibition, and in line with literature, seems to suggest a nominally lower reported rates of irAEs vs CTLA-4 inhibitors. This analysis demonstrates several risk factors for irAEs by indication, severity and location of irAE, and by patient ethnicity. Additionally, several potential irAE risk factors that have been published to date, such as demographic factors, liver enzymes, TSH and blood cell counts, are assessed in this large-scale meta-analysis, providing a more consistent picture of their relevance. However, given the small effects size, changes to clinical management of irAEs associated with the use of Anti-PDL1 therapy are not warranted.

Abstract Background Dose-limiting toxicities significantly impact the benefit/risk profile of many drugs. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) in patients receiving drugs with dose-limiting toxicities can identify therapeutic hypotheses to prevent these toxicities. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting neurological toxicity of chemotherapies with no effective approach for prevention. Methods We conducted a genetic study of time-to-first peripheral neuropathy event using 30× germline WGS data from whole blood samples from 4900 European-ancestry cancer patients in 14 randomized controlled trials. A substantial number of patients in these trials received taxane and platinum-based chemotherapies as part of their treatment regimen, either standard of care or in combination with the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab. The trials spanned several cancers including renal cell carcinoma, triple negative breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, bladder cancer, ovarian cancer, and melanoma. Results We identified a locus consisting of low-frequency variants in intron 13 of GRID2 associated with time-to-onset of first peripheral neuropathy (PN) indexed by rs17020773 ( p = 2.03 × 10 −8 , all patients, p = 6.36 × 10 −9 , taxane treated). Gene-level burden analysis identified rare coding variants associated with increased PN risk in the C-terminus of GPR68 ( p = 1.59 × 10 −6 , all patients, p = 3.47 × 10 −8 , taxane treated), a pH-sensitive G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). The variants driving this signal were found to alter predicted arrestin binding motifs in the C-terminus of GPR68 . Analysis of snRNA-seq from human dorsal root ganglia (DRG) indicated that expression of GPR68 was highest in mechano-thermo-sensitive nociceptors. Conclusions Our genetic study provides insight into the impact of low-frequency and rare coding genetic variation on PN risk and suggests that further study of GPR68 in sensory neurons may yield a therapeutic hypothesis for prevention of CIPN.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet their use is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Estimating the prevalence and patient impact of these irAEs in the real-world data setting is critical for characterizing the benefit/risk profile of ICI therapies beyond the clinical trial population. Diagnosis codes, such as International Classification of Diseases codes, do not comprehensively illustrate a patient's care journey and offer no insight into drug-irAE causality. This study aims to capture the relationship between ICIs and irAEs more accurately by using augmented curation (AC), a natural language processing-based innovation, on unstructured data in electronic health records. METHODS: In a cohort of 9,290 patients treated with ICIs at Mayo Clinic from 2005 to 2021, we compared the prevalence of irAEs using diagnosis codes and AC models, which classify drug-irAE pairs in clinical notes with implied textual causality. Four illustrative irAEs with high patient impact-myocarditis, encephalitis, pneumonitis, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions, abbreviated as MEPS-were analyzed using corticosteroid administration and ICI discontinuation as proxies of severity. RESULTS: For MEPS, only 70% (n = 118) of patients found by AC were also identified by diagnosis codes. Using AC models, patients with MEPS received corticosteroids for their respective irAE 82% of the time and permanently discontinued the ICI because of the irAE 35.9% (n = 115) of the time. CONCLUSION: Overall, AC models enabled more accurate identification and assessment of patient impact of ICI-induced irAEs not found using diagnosis codes, demonstrating a novel and more efficient strategy to assess real-world clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICIs.

BACKGROUND: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative technologies, revolutionising natural language understanding and generation across various domains, including medicine. In this study, we investigated the capabilities, limitations, and generalisability of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models in analysing unstructured patient notes from large healthcare datasets to identify immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and GPT-4o models on manually annotated datasets of patients receiving ICI therapy, sampled from two electronic health record (EHR) systems and seven clinical trials. A zero-shot prompt was designed to exhaustively identify irAEs at both the patient level (main analysis) and the note level (secondary analysis). The LLM-based system followed a multi-label classification approach to identify any combination of irAEs associated with individual patients or clinical notes. System evaluation was conducted for each available irAE as well as for broader categories of irAEs classified at the organ level. FINDINGS: Our analysis included 442 patients across three institutions. The most common irAEs manually identified in the patient datasets included pneumonitis (N = 64), colitis (N = 56), rash (N = 32), and hepatitis (N = 28). The GPT models demonstrated generalisable abilities in identifying irAEs across EHRs and clinical trial reports. Overall, the models achieved relatively high sensitivity and specificity but only moderate positive predictive values, reflecting a potential bias towards overpredicting irAE outcomes. GPT-4o achieved the highest F1 and micro-averaged F1 scores for both patient-level and note-level evaluations. Highest performance was observed in the haematological (F1 range = 1.0-1.0), gastrointestinal (F1 range = 0.81-0.85), and musculoskeletal and rheumatologic (F1 range = 0.67-1.0) irAE categories. Error analysis uncovered substantial limitations of GPT models in handling textual causation, where adverse events should not only be accurately identified in clinical text but also causally linked to immune checkpoint inhibitors. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrated that GPT models can automate the detection of immune related adverse events in varied healthcare datasets, reducing the burden on physicians and other healthcare professionals by limiting the need for manual review. This capability will accelerate the generation of safety insights across large healthcare datasets and facilitate the characterisation of patient-level drivers of toxicities, thus enhancing safety monitoring and ultimately improving patient care. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health, Roche, National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Foundation, Angela Anderson Research Fund, Larry L Hillblom Foundation and UCSF Research Allocation Program.