Bo He

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors associated with sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries. DATA SOURCES: The online PubMed database was searched for English articles describing outcomes after the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries in humans with a publication date between 1 January 1990 and 16 February 2011. STUDY SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ARTICLE WERE SELECTED: (1) clinical trials describing the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries published in English; and (2) studies that reported sufficient patient information, including age, mechanism of injury, nerve injured, injury location, defect length, repair time, repair method, and repair materials. SPSS 13.0 software was used to perform univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and to investigate the patient and intervention factors associated with outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensory function was assessed using the Mackinnon-Dellon scale and motor function was assessed using the manual muscle test. Satisfactory motor recovery was defined as grade M4 or M5, and satisfactory sensory recovery was defined as grade S3(+) or S4. RESULTS: Seventy-one articles were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that repair time, repair materials, and nerve injured were independent predictors of outcome after the repair of nerve injuries (P < 0.05), and that the nerve injured was the main factor affecting the rate of good to excellent recovery. CONCLUSION: Predictors of outcome after the repair of peripheral nerve injuries include age, gender, repair time, repair materials, nerve injured, defect length, and duration of follow-up.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was isolated from a pig during a survey for possible routes of viral transmission after a SARS epidemic. Sequence and epidemiology analyses suggested that the pig was infected by a SARS-CoV of human origin.

This study developed a human acellular nerve graft (hANG) as an alternative to autogenous nerve and reports on its safety and efficacy. There were two groups comprised of 72 patients that received digital nerve repair with hANG (test) and 81 that received conventional direct tension-free suture repair of the nerve defect (control). The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing. Safety was evaluated by local wound response and laboratory testing. Mean age of patients in the test group was 33.0 ± 11.1 years (range 18-61 years) and in the control group 36.9 ± 13.4 years (range 15-77 years) (p = 0.0470). Mean time from injury to repair in the test group was 23.7 ± 52 days (range 0-200 days) and in the control group 1.5 ± 10.4 days (range 0-91 days) (p = 0.0005). Mean length of nerve graft was 1.80 ± 0.82 cm (range 1-5 cm). All surgeries were performed successfully and without complications. The excellent and good rate of s2PD in the test group was 65.28% and 95% CI was 51.98-78.93%. s2PD in the test group improved over time and average distance was 12.81 ± 5.99 mm at 6 months postoperatively. No serious adverse or product-related events were reported. These results indicate that hANG is a safe and effective for the repair of nerve defects of 1-5 cm in size.