Simeon Santourlidis

Human NK cells are characterized by the expression of surface receptors of the killer cell Ig-like receptor (KIR) family, which are involved in the specific recognition of pathogenic target cells. Each NK cell expresses and maintains an individual subset of inhibitory and stimulatory KIR and in this way contributes to a diversified NK cell repertoire. To date, the molecular basis for generation of clonally distributed KIR expression patterns has been elusive. Here, analyses of DNA methylation patterns of KIR genes in NK cell lines as well as in NK cells, freshly isolated from peripheral blood, demonstrated that a small CpG island surrounding the transcriptional start site of each KIR gene is consistently demethylated in expressed KIR and methylated in unexpressed KIR. DNA-demethylating treatment resulted in a rapid and stable induction of transcription and cell surface expression of all formerly unexpressed KIR in NK cell lines, NK cell clones, and freshly isolated NK cells, but not in other cell types. In vitro methylation of KIR CpG islands repressed reporter gene expression in NK cells. We conclude that clonal patterns of KIR expression are mainly epigenetically determined and maintained through DNA methylation.

BACKGROUND: The miR-200c/141 cluster has recently been implicated in the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) process. The expression of these two miRNAs is inversely correlated with tumorigenicity and invasiveness in several human cancers. The role of these miRNAs in cancer progression is based in part on their capacity to target the EMT activators ZEB1 and ZEB2, two transcription factors, which in turn repress expression of E-cadherin. Little is known about the regulation of the mir200c/141 cluster, whose targeting has been proposed as a promising new therapy for the most aggressive tumors. FINDINGS: We show that the miR-200c/141 cluster is repressed by DNA methylation of a CpG island located in the promoter region of these miRNAs. Whereas in vitro methylation of the miR-200c/141 promoter led to shutdown of promoter activity, treatment with a demethylating agent caused transcriptional reactivation in breast cancer cells formerly lacking expression of miR-200c and miR-141. More importantly, we observed that DNA methylation of the identified miR-200c/141 promoter was tightly correlated with phenotype and the invasive capacity in a panel of 8 human breast cancer cell lines. In line with this, in vitro induction of EMT by ectopic expression of the EMT transcription factor Twist in human immortalized mammary epithelial cells (HMLE) was accompanied by increased DNA methylation and concomitant repression of the miR-200c/141 locus. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that expression of the miR-200c/141 cluster is regulated by DNA methylation, suggesting epigenetic regulation of this miRNA locus in aggressive breast cancer cell lines as well as untransformed mammary epithelial cells. This epigenetic silencing mechanism might represent a novel component of the regulatory circuit for the maintenance of EMT programs in cancer and normal cells.

BACKGROUND: Alterations of DNA methylation have been reported in many human cancers. In prostatic carcinoma, hypermethylation of the GST P gene promoter and an overall decrease in methylcytosine content have been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and extent of these alterations in relation to tumor stage and grade, in order to explore their clinical relevance and to determine their relationship to each other. METHODS: DNA from 32 histologically verified adenocarcinomas of the prostate was analyzed for GST P hypermethylation by a semiquantitative PCR method and for overall DNA methylation by quantitative Southern blot analysis or LM-PCR of LINE-1 repetitive sequence methylation. RESULTS: GST P hypermethylation was detected in 24/32 (75%) specimens, and LINE-1 hypomethylation in 17/32 (53%). Both alterations tended to increase in frequency and extent with tumor stage. All but 1 of 8 carcinomas with lymph node involvement were positive for GST P hypermethylation. Six of these as compared to 2 out of 24 showed strong hypomethylation (P = 0.005). Hypermethylation and hypomethylation did not show a quantitative correlation, but all except two samples with weak LINE-1 hypomethylation also displayed GST P hypermethylation. CONCLUSIONS: GST P hypermethylation is an extremely frequent change in prostatic carcinoma which most probably precedes genome-wide hypomethylation. It appears useful for sensitive detection of prostatic carcinoma, whereas pronounced LINE-1 hypomethylation may be associated with progressive tumors.

To elucidate the relationship between genomewide DNA hypomethylation and chromosome instability, 55 prostate carcinoma specimens were analyzed for extent of hypomethylation by Southern blot analysis of LINE-1 sequence methylation and for loss or gain of chromosomal material by comparative genomic hybridization. Seventeen (31%) tumors showed strong hypomethylation of DNA, whereas four (7%) displayed slight hypomethylation and the rest of the tumors normal-level methylation. Chromosomal aberrations were observed in 34 carcinomas. The most frequent chromosomal alterations were loss of 13q in 18 cases and aberrations in 8p (loss) or 8q (gain) in 16 cases. The presence of chromosomal loss or gain was significantly associated with the presence of strong hypomethylation. A striking correlation (P = 0.00001) was observed between aberrations on chromosome 8 and hypomethylation, whereas no association was seen between DNA hypomethylation and loss of 13q. The association between DNA hypomethylation and the presence of metastases was statistically significant (P = 0.044), and both chromosomal alterations and DNA hypomethylation tended to be more frequent in higher-stage tumors. In conclusion, the data indicate that hypomethylation is associated with chromosomal instability in prostate cancer. Specifically, a surprisingly strong association between alterations on chromosome 8 and genomewide hypomethylation was found. This association suggests that DNA hypomethylation and alterations in chromosome 8 may be mechanistically linked to each other in prostate carcinoma.