Jacques-Éric Bergez

Intensive agriculture has led to several drawbacks such as biodiversity loss, climate change, erosion, and pollution of air and water. A potential solution is to implement management practices that increase the level of provision of ecosystem services such as soil fertility and biological regulation. There is a lot of literature on the principles of agroecology. However, there is a gap of knowledge between agroecological principles and practical applications. Therefore, we review here agroecological and management sciences to identify two facts that explain the lack of practical applications: (1) the occurrence of high uncertainties about relations between agricultural practices, ecological processes, and ecosystem services, and (2) the site-specific character of agroecological practices required to deliver expected ecosystem services. We also show that an adaptive-management approach, focusing on planning and monitoring, can serve as a framework for developing and implementing learning tools tailored for biodiversity-based agriculture. Among the current learning tools developed by researchers, we identify two main types of emergent support tools likely to help design diversified farming systems and landscapes: (1) knowledge bases containing scientific supports and experiential knowledge and (2) model-based games. These tools have to be coupled with well-tailored field or management indicators that allow monitoring effects of practices on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Finally, we propose a research agenda that requires bringing together contributions from agricultural, ecological, management, and knowledge management sciences, and asserts that researchers have to take the position of "integration and implementation sciences.

The adjustment of the parameters in mechanistic crop models to field data, using an automatic procedure, is essential to ensure efficient and objective use of measured data. However, it is in general numerically impossible, and in any case undoubtedly unwise, to adjust all the model parameters to the measured data. There is currently no widely accepted solution to this problem. This paper proposes a new approach to parameter adjustment, and applies it to a model of corn growth and development. One begins by defining a criterion of model goodness‐of‐fit, which should be adapted to the goal of the modeling exercise, and a corresponding criterion of model prediction error. For the latter we propose a cross validation version of the goodness‐of‐fit criterion. In Step 1 of the algorithm, one orders the parameters according to how much each improves the goodness‐of‐fit of the model. In the second step, the number of parameters actually adjusted is chosen to minimize the prediction error criterion. This approach has the advantage of explicitly using prediction quality as a criterion. As a by‐product, it leads to adjusting relatively few parameters (in our example, 3 out of the 26 potentially adjustable parameters), which considerably reduces the numerical problems. The procedure is quite straightforward to apply, although it does require substantial computing time.