Agilent/Dako

Monoclonal Mouse Anti-Human Ki-67 Antigen, Clone MIB-1

#M7240 · immunohistochemistry

60
Evidence Score · Well-Established
Used by 93 independent labs across 100 papers. How we score this →
100
Citing papers
16.4k
Combined citations
Supplier page Find this product

Research areas

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies10HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research9Cancer Cells and Metastasis9Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment7Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics7Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism6Breast Lesions and Carcinomas5Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism5

Papers citing this product

1
Genome-wide association between YAP/TAZ/TEAD and AP-1 at enhancers drives oncogenic growth
Nature Cell Biology·2015·1.2k cit.·DOI
2
Unravelling subclonal heterogeneity and aggressive disease states in TNBC through single-cell RNA-seq
Nature Communications·2018·509 cit.·DOI
3
Wnt signaling directs a metabolic program of glycolysis and angiogenesis in colon cancer
The EMBO Journal·2014·470 cit.·DOI
4
miRNA-mRNA Integrated Analysis Reveals Roles for miRNAs in Primary Breast Tumors
PLoS ONE·2011·323 cit.·DOI
5
Identification of Cancer Stem Cells in Ewing's Sarcoma
Cancer Research·2009·305 cit.·DOI
6
Selective CDK4/6 inhibition with tumor responses by PD0332991 in patients with mantle cell lymphoma
Blood·2012·297 cit.·DOI
7
Cisplatin Induces Pyroptosis via Activation of MEG3/NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD Pathway in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
International Journal of Biological Sciences·2021·295 cit.·DOI
8
Methylation of all BRCA1 copies predicts response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in ovarian carcinoma
Nature Communications·2018·288 cit.·DOI
9
Synthetic lethality between androgen receptor signalling and the PARP pathway in prostate cancer
Nature Communications·2017·278 cit.·DOI
10
Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy, <sup>123</sup>I-MIBG Scintigraphy, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET
Journal of Nuclear Medicine·2010·277 cit.·DOI

Rate this reagent

Used this in your lab? Leave a quick rating. Reviews are anonymous and verified by academic email before they appear.

Your email is never shown publicly.