Enhancing Accessibility and Engagement in the <scp>MRI</scp> Community: Reflections on the 2025 <scp>ISMRM MiniHub</scp> in Lille, France
Nicholas P. Blockley(University of Nottingham), David G. Norris(Radboud University Nijmegen), Penny L. Hubbard Cristinacce(University of Manchester), Moritz Zaiß(Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Olivier Lafon(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Margaret A. Hall‐Craggs(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
Cited by 0
Related Papers
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
|Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy|2018|542
Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance|2011|326
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR<i>Z</i>-spectroscopy<i>in vivo</i>: a review of theoretical approaches and methods
|Physics in Medicine and Biology|2013|320
Inverse <i>Z</i>‐spectrum analysis for spillover‐, MT‐, and <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>‐corrected steady‐state pulsed CEST‐MRI – application to pH‐weighted MRI of acute stroke
|NMR in Biomedicine|2014|311
Review and consensus recommendations on clinical <scp>APT</scp>‐weighted imaging approaches at <scp>3T</scp>: Application to brain tumors
|Magnetic Resonance in Medicine|2022|236