Additional file 1: Appendix 1. of Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort
Adam R. Brentnall(Queen Mary University of London), D. Evans, Jamie C. Sergeant(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Mary R. Wilson, Jack Cuzick(Queen Mary University of London), Ursula Beetles(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Elaine F. Harkness(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Valerie Reece(Breast Cancer Care), Michelle Harvie(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Paula Stavrinos(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Yit Yoong Lim(Wythenshawe Hospital), Louise S. Donnelly(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Soujanya Gadde(Breast Cancer Care), Sara Bundred(Breast Cancer Care), Nicola Barr(Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Anthony Howell, Anil Jain, Sarah Sampson(Breast Cancer Care), Susan Astley, Lynne Fox(Breast Cancer Research Foundation)
Cited by 0
Related Papers
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
|BMJ|2020|3.3k
De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017
|Annals of Oncology|2017|1.3k
Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes
|The American Journal of Human Genetics|2018|1.2k
Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening
|International Journal of Cancer|2006|1.1k