US Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Imetelstat for Selected Patients With Low- to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Transfusion-Dependent Anemia

Nina Kim(United States Food and Drug Administration), Dianne Pulte(United States Food and Drug Administration), Lori A. Ehrlich(United States Food and Drug Administration), Alexei Ionan(United States Food and Drug Administration), Spencer R. Haupert(United States Food and Drug Administration), Jonathon Vallejo(United States Food and Drug Administration), Francis Green(United States Food and Drug Administration), Nan Zheng(United States Food and Drug Administration), Yun Wang(United States Food and Drug Administration), Jiang Liu(United States Food and Drug Administration), Javier G. Blanco(United States Food and Drug Administration), Sarah E. Dorff(United States Food and Drug Administration), Brian Booth(United States Food and Drug Administration), Moran Choe(United States Food and Drug Administration), Brenda J. Gehrke(United States Food and Drug Administration), Vishal Bhatnagar(United States Food and Drug Administration), Marc R. Theoret(United States Food and Drug Administration), Richard Pazdur(United States Food and Drug Administration), R. Angelo de Claro(United States Food and Drug Administration), Kelly J. Norsworthy(United States Food and Drug Administration)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
October 24, 2025
Cited by 0

Abstract

On June 6, 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved imetelstat (RYTELO, Geron) for adults with low- to intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with transfusion-dependent anemia requiring ≥4 red blood cell units over 8 weeks who have not responded to or have lost response to or are ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. The approval was based on a randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial, Study MDS3001. In the protocol-specified primary analysis, the ≥8-week RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) rate was 39.8% (95% CI, 30.9 to 49.3) in the imetelstat group versus 15% (95% CI, 7.1 to 26.6) in the placebo group ( P < .001). This was supported by the rate of ≥24-week RBC-TI of 28% (95% CI, 20.1 to 37) in the imetelstat group versus 3.3% (95% CI, 0.4 to 11.5) in the placebo group ( P < .001). However, there was no major difference between arms regarding the key secondary end point of erythroid response (HI-E) per International Working Group 2006 criteria or secondary end points reflective of a disease-modifying effect such as complete remission rate and overall survival. The most common adverse reactions were thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, increased liver enzymes, fatigue, prolonged partial thromboplastin time, arthralgia/myalgia, COVID-19, and headache. The rate of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were 72% and 65%, respectively, in the imetelstat arm compared with 7% and 8% in the placebo arm. Despite the high incidence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the FDA determined that the benefits outweighed the risks in this patient population with high unmet need. Postmarketing requirements were issued to evaluate long-term safety and to conduct a randomized trial comparing at least two dosages of imetelstat to potentially minimize risks of imetelstat treatment and improve tolerability.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis