Augmented Enteral Protein During Critical Illness

Matthew J. Summers(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Lee‐anne S. Chapple(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Amalia Karahalios(The University of Melbourne), Rinaldo Bellomo(The University of Melbourne), Marianne J. Chapman(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Suzie Ferrie(The University of Sydney), Mark Finnis(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Craig French(The University of Melbourne), Sally Hurford(Medical Research Institute of New Zealand), Nima Kakho(Geelong Hospital), Matthew J. Maiden(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Stephanie N. O’Connor(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Sandra Peake(Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society), Jeffrey Presneill(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Emma J. Ridley(The Alfred Hospital), An Tran‐Duy(The University of Melbourne), Patricia Williams(Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society), Paul J. Young(The University of Melbourne), Sophie Zaloumis(The University of Melbourne), Adam M. Deane(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Suzie Ferrie(The University of Sydney), Imogen Asser, Nerissa Brown, Lee‐anne S. Chapple(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Sarah J. Doherty, Mark Finnis(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Mahni Foster, Kathleen Glasby, Rhea Louis, Fiona McDonald, Mark P. Plummer, Stephanie O’Connor(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Justine Rivett, Matthew J. Summers(Royal Adelaide Hospital), Sandra Peake(Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society), Catherine Kurenda, Srilatha Vemparala, Patricia Williams(Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society), Rinaldo Bellomo(The University of Melbourne), Christine Choong, Glenn M. Eastwood, Kate Hamilton, Leah Peck, Helen Young, Deborah Barge, Alice Barrese, Kathleen Byrne, Adam M. Deane(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Kate Fetterplace, Olivia Gigli, Matthew J. Maiden(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Jeffrey Presneill(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Brianna Tascone, Kym Wittholz, Samantha Bates, Craig French(The University of Melbourne), Haindavi Muppa, Giang T. Nguyen, Stephanie Schembri, Stacey Hawker, Michelle Horton, Lynda Jaques, Nima Kakho(Geelong Hospital), Jemma Trickey, April Aguilar, Muhammad Qasim Butt, Mary Rose Sol Cruz, Kirsha Delaney, Dushanka Hettige, Sally Hurford(Medical Research Institute of New Zealand), Reece Latonio, Eden Lesona, Joradee Marmol, Leanlove Navarra, Shan Shan Qiu, Nola Wood-Harris, Paul J. Young(The University of Melbourne), Amalia Karahalios(The University of Melbourne), Sophie Zaloumis(The University of Melbourne)
JAMA
June 11, 2025
Cited by 38Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Importance: Guidelines recommend augmenting enteral protein during critical illness, but the impact on patient outcomes is uncertain. Objective: To determine whether augmenting enteral protein increases days alive and free from hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized, crossover, open-label trial recruited critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition from 8 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand from May 23, 2022, to August 23, 2023, with final follow-up on November 21, 2023. Intervention: Two isocaloric enteral formulae were compared: augmented protein (100 g protein/L) vs usual protein (63 g protein/L). ICUs used formulae sequentially for 3 months over a 12-month period; 4 ICUs commenced with augmented protein and 4 commenced with usual protein. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of days free of admittance to the index hospital and alive at day 90. Secondary outcomes included days free of the index hospital at day 90 in survivors; alive at day 90; durations of invasive ventilation, ICU, and hospital admission; incidences of tracheostomy insertion and new kidney replacement therapy; and hospital discharge destination. Results: A total of 3397 patients were included (median [IQR] age, 61 (48-71) years; 2157 [64%] male). The median (IQR) number of days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90 was 62 (0-77) days in the augmented protein group and 64 (0-77) days in the usual protein group, with an adjusted-for-period between-group median difference of -1.97 (95% CI, -7.24 to 3.30) days (P = .46). At day 90, a total of 1221 of 1681 patients (72.6%) were alive in the augmented protein group and 1269 of 1716 (74.0%) were alive in the usual protein group (risk ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.95-1.03]). Between-group differences for secondary outcomes included the following: difference in median days free of hospital in survivors, 0.01 (95% CI, -1.94 to 1.96) days; difference in mean duration of invasive ventilation, 6.8 (95% CI, -3.0 to 16.5) hours; cause-specific hazard ratios for durations of ICU admission (time to live ICU discharge), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-1.00) and hospital admission (time to live hospital discharge), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.90-1.02); and risk ratio for tracheostomy, 1.15 (95% CI, 0.66-2.01) and new kidney replacement therapy, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.81-1.16). Discharge destinations were similar. Conclusions and Relevance: Augmenting enteral protein during critical illness did not improve number of days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90. Trial Registration: ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12621001484831.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis