Real-world insights: Neoadjuvant KEYNOTE-522 regimen in triple-negative breast cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations.

Monique Celeste Tavares(AC Camargo Hospital), Romualdo Barroso‐Sousa, Laura Testa(D’Or Institute for Research and Education), Flávia Cavalcanti Balint(AC Camargo Hospital), Solange Moraes Sanches(AC Camargo Hospital), Fernanda Madasi Pinheiro(Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA), José Bines, Vladmir Cláudio Cordeiro de Lima(AC Camargo Hospital), Rafael Dal Ponte Ferreira(Hospital Moinhos de Vento), Daniela Dornelles Rosa(Hospital Moinhos de Vento), Zenaide Silva de Souza(Hospital Sírio-Libanês), Daniele Xavier Assad(Hospital Sírio-Libanês), Débora De Melo Gagliato(Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo), Carlos Henrique dos Anjos(Hospital Sírio-Libanês), Bruna Migliavacca Zucchetti, Anezka Ferrari(Hospital Santa Paula), Mayana Lopes de Brito, Maria Marcela Monteiro(Hospital Haroldo Juaçaba), Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz(Universidade de São Paulo), Renata Colombo Bonadio(D’Or Institute for Research and Education)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 28, 2025
Cited by 1

Abstract

e12618 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most immunogenic subtype and is highly prevalent among patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCAm). Regardless of mutation status, the current standard treatment for early-stage TNBC is chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab, as per the KEYNOTE-522 protocol. Methods: Data were collected from pts diagnosed with early-stage TNBC treated according to the KEYNOTE-522 regimen at ten cancer centers from July 2020 to December 2024. Epidemiological data and treatment outcomes of pts with gBRCAm were compared to those with BRCA wild-type/unknown (BRCAwt). Results: A total of 413 pts were analyzed, of whom 320 (82%) underwent germline testing; 49 (12.7%) had a gBRCAm, including 45 (91%) with BRCA1 and 4 (9%) with BRCA2 mutations. Pts with gBRCAm were younger (median 39 vs. 44 years, P<0.001) and more likely to be premenopausal (80.8% vs. 65.6%, P=0.045) and have grade 3 tumors (91% vs. 80%, P=0.214) than BRCAwt pts. Stage II disease was the most common in both groups (71.4% vs. 70%, P=0.315). Regarding treatment, gBRCAm pts were more frequently treated with dose-dense AC (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) (66% vs. 54%, P=0.160) and underwent mastectomy more often (93.9% vs. 35.9%, P=0.001). Only 2% of gBRCAm pts experienced disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy compared to 5% of BRCAwt pts (P=0.491).Pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0-Tis ypN0) rates were 73% in gBRCAm pts compared to 61% in BRCAwt pts (P=0.114). Residual cancer burden (RCB) 0-1 occurred in 83.7% vs. 76.6% (P=0.345). Subgroup analysis by disease stage revealed pCR rates of 74.3% in stage II gBRCAm pts versus 65.2% in BRCAwt pts (P=0.334), and 72.7% in stage III gBRCAm pts compared to 45.3% in BRCAwt pts (P=0.113).Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) occurred in 50% of gBRCAm pts versus 34.9% of BRCAwt pts (P=0.055), with more frequent neutropenia (32.6% vs. 19.5%, P=0.041), diarrhea (6.1% vs. 1.6%, P=0.079), and immune-related AEs (12.2% vs. 7.4%, P=0.259). There were no significant differences in drug discontinuation rates due to toxicity (28% vs. 22%, P=0.327). Conclusions: Pts with gBRCAm exhibited high pCR rates with the KEYNOTE-522 regimen, achieving pCR rates over 70% even in stage III disease. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies in this population, including potential de-escalation approaches.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis