Ultrasensitive detection and tracking of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and association with relapse and survival in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC): Phase 3 CALLA trial analyses.

Jyoti Mayadev(University of California San Diego Medical Center), Juan Carlos Vázquez Limón(Universidad de Guadalajara), Francisco Javier Ramírez Godinez(Hospital Civil de Guadalajara), Manuel Leiva(Universidad Ricardo Palma), Lucely Cetina(Instituto Nacional de Cancerología), Szilvia Varga(National Institute of Oncology), Alejandro Molina Alavez(Universidad Marista de Mérida), A. E. Alarcon-Rozas, Natalia Valdivieso(Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas), Xiaohua Wu(Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Masaki Mandai(Kyoto University), Ronnie Shapira‐Frommer(Sheba Medical Center), Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz(Universidade de São Paulo), Sewanti Limaye(Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre), Wenjing Xin(AstraZeneca (Sweden)), Hannah Dry(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Maria A.S. Broggi(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Daniel Y. Yuan(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Ross Stewart(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Bradley J. Monk(Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 28, 2025
Cited by 5

Abstract

5502 Background: In LACC, there is an unmet need for prognostic biomarkers as about 1/3 of patients (pts) relapse after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The global randomized CALLA trial (NCT03830866) of durvalumab (D) in combination with CRT followed by D (D+CRT arm) vs CRT (CRT arm) did not significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) in a biomarker unselected intent-to-treat (ITT) population. We analyzed the association of ultrasensitive ctDNA detection with relapse and survival in the largest ctDNA data set in LACC to date. Methods: Adult women with Stage IB2-IIB node positive (N+) or IIIA-IVA any N LACC (ITT) were randomized 1:1 to D+CRT or CRT alone. NeXT Personal (Personalis, Fremont, CA), an ultrasensitive tumor-informed MRD assay with up to 1,800 patient-specific variants from WGS, was used for ctDNA analysis from Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1; baseline [BL]), C3D1, and 6 mo post treatment initiation. Correlations were analyzed between ctDNA detection and outcomes (PFS, overall survival [OS]). Results: Of 770 pts randomized, the biomarker-evaluable population (BEP) comprised 185, 186, and 130 pts at BL, C3D1, and 6 mo, respectively. BL pt characteristics, PD-L1, PFS, and OS between BEP and ITT populations were generally similar. ctDNA was detected in 99% of pts at BL and decreased after treatment, reaching 23% in the D+CRT and 36% in the CRT arm at 6 mo. The lower detection rate in the D+CRT arm was associated with the PD-L1 tumor area positivity (TAP) ≥20% subpopulation. At BL, pts with low (<BL median [5268.2 ppm]) ctDNA levels had a reduced risk of progression vs pts with high (≥median) ctDNA levels (PFS hazard ratio [HR] D+CRT 0.57 [95% CI, 0.26-1.26]; CRT 0.62 [0.31-1.23]). Pts with detectable ctDNA at C3D1 or 6 mo had a higher risk of progression independent of treatment arm (Table). No differences in risk of progression between the D+CRT vs CRT arms were observed based on ctDNA detection. Correlations between ctDNA and OS will be presented. Conclusions: This pre-planned analysis of a large, global LACC population from CALLA demonstrates the high sensitivity of a personalized ctDNA assay. High ctDNA levels at BL were associated with higher risk of progression or death. Lower ctDNA detection rates after treatment with D+CRT and CRT correlated with improved survival and highlight increased tumor control by D, especially in the PD-L1 TAP ≥20% subpopulation. This analysis supports the potential utility of ultrasensitive ctDNA analysis to guide treatment decisions in LACC. Clinical trial information: NCT03830866 . D+CRT CRT Not detected Detected Not detected Detected C3D1 n=60 n=33 n=56 n=37 Median PFS (95% CI), mo NC (NC-NC) 14.03 (7.49-NC) NC (NC-NC) 10.68 (7.39-NC) HR (95% CI) 0.23 (0.11-0.50) 0.15 (0.07-0.33) 6 mo n=49 n=15 n=42 n=24 Median PFS(95% CI), mo NC (NC-NC) 10.35 (7.49-NC) NC (NC-NC) 12.98 (10.38-NC) HR (95% CI) 0.04 (0.01-0.16) 0.04 (0.01-0.17) NC, not computed/not reached.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis