Capivasertib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: phase 3 CAPItello-291 study extended Chinese cohort

Xichun Hu(Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Qingyuan Zhang(Harbin Medical University), Tao Sun(Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute), Huihua Xiong(Tongji Hospital), Wei Li(Jilin University), Yuee Teng(First Hospital of China Medical University), Yen‐Shen Lu(National Taiwan University Hospital), Ling‐Ming Tseng(Taipei Veterans General Hospital), Min Yan(Zhengzhou University), Hongsheng Li(Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Hospital), Danmei Pang(First People's Hospital of Foshan), Shin‐Cheh Chen(Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), Wenyan Chen(Third Hospital of Nanchang), Ou Jiang(Neijiang Normal University), Jingfen Wang(Linyi People's Hospital), Xinhong Wu(Hubei Cancer Hospital), Xian Wang(Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital), Aimin Zang(Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University), Xiaojia Wang(Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital), Julie Collins(AstraZeneca (United States)), Ethan Fan, Lin Jiang, Xiaoling Zeng, Nicholas C. Turner(Institute of Cancer Research)
Nature Communications
May 9, 2025
Cited by 13Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

In the global CAPItello-291 randomized phase 3 study (NCT04305496) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and progression during/after aromatase inhibitor treatment, capivasertib-fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population and patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors versus placebo-fulvestrant. We assessed efficacy and safety of capivasertib-fulvestrant in a prespecified exploratory analysis of a Chinese cohort (n = 24) and extended study with the same protocol (n = 110). Clinically meaningful PFS benefit for capivasertib-fulvestrant was observed in the overall population (median PFS: 6.9 [capivasertib-fulvestrant] versus 2.8 [placebo-fulvestrant] months; hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76), patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (n = 46; 5.7 versus 1.9 months; hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.85) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors (patients with confirmed next-generation sequencing results [n = 68]; 9.2 versus 2.7 months; hazard ratio 0.38; 95% CI 0.21-0.68). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) with capivasertib-fulvestrant were diarrhea (60.6% versus 11.3% with placebo-fulvestrant) and hyperglycemia (57.7% versus 17.7%). AEs leading to capivasertib-fulvestrant discontinuation were reported in 11.3% of patients versus 3.2% for placebo-fulvestrant. The benefit-risk profile of capivasertib-fulvestrant in the Chinese cohort was favorable; further exploration in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors is warranted.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis