SMALL: open surgery versus minimally invasive vacuum-assisted excision for small screen-detected breast cancer—protocol for a phase III randomised multicentre trial

Kenneth Elder(Western General Hospital), Charlotte E. Coles(University of Cambridge), David Dodwell(University of Oxford), Beatrix Elsberger(Aberdeen Royal Infirmary), Jessica Foster(Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit), Claire Gaunt(Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit), Julia Henderson(University of Liverpool), Iain Lyburn(Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Claire Mabena(Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust), Jenna Morgan(University of Sheffield), Zohal Nabi(Mount Vernon Cancer Centre), Sangeetha Paramasivan(University of Bristol), Sarah Pinder(King's College London), Sarah Pirrie(Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit), Shelley Potter(Southmead Hospital), Tracy Roberts(University of Birmingham), Nisha Sharma(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), Elizabeth Southgate(Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit), Hilary Stobart(The Patients Association), Amruta Talwalkar(Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust), Sian Taylor‐Phillips(University of Warwick), William Teh(Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust), Elliot Turner(Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit), Matthew Wallis(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Dan Rea(Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit), Stuart McIntosh(Queen's University Belfast)
BMJ Open
April 1, 2025
Cited by 2Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Introduction Mammographic screening identifies many women with small breast cancers with favourable biological features, which have an excellent prognosis. Some of these may never have become clinically apparent without screening and are commonly described as ‘overdiagnosed’ cancers. Despite this, all patients with screen-detected cancers are currently treated with surgical excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy, although this may represent overtreatment. There is, therefore, a need for less invasive approaches to reduce treatment burden for patients while maintaining current excellent oncological outcomes. Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) may represent such an alternative treatment approach, and the SMALL ( Open Surgery versus Minimally invasive-vacuum Assisted excision for smaLL screen-detected breast cancer ) trial aims to investigate the use of VAE for the safe de-escalation of surgical treatment for such excellent prognosis invasive breast cancers. Methods SMALL is a prospective, multicentre, randomised phase III trial of VAE versus surgery in patients with small, biologically favourable screen-detected invasive breast cancer. SMALL has an innovative hybrid design with coprimary endpoints. These include a randomised non-inferiority comparison of surgical re-excision rates following initial treatment, and a single-arm analysis of local recurrence at 5 years following VAE. Secondary outcomes include complication rates, overall survival, quality of life and a health economic analysis. The trial includes a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention to support recruitment. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained from the Office for Research Ethics (Northern Ireland) for all UK sites. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, presented, shared with patient partners and with relevant professional organisations to inform future guideline development for the management of screen-detected breast cancer. Trial registration number ISRCTN12240119 .


Related Papers