ICU Patient-to-Pharmacist Ratios: A Prospective, Multicenter Time-Motion Study

Mitchell S. Buckley(Arizona Research Center), Susan Smith(University of Georgia), Barbara Birriel(Pennsylvania State University), John Radosevich(St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center), Amy Dzierba(New York University), Russel J. Roberts(Massachusetts General Hospital), Jeffrey F. Barletta(Midwestern University), Hayley B. Gershengorn(University of Miami), Andrea Sikora(University of Georgia), Lars‐Kristofer N. Peterson(Cooper University Health Care), Ryan P. Bodkin(University of Rochester Medical Center), David A. Kaufman(University of Rochester Medical Center), Thomas Ardiles(United Therapeutics (United States)), Suresh Uppalapu(Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix), Allison Tompeck(Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix), Paul Dabrowski(Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix), Letitia Close(Cleveland Clinic), Heidi Brewer(Carondelet Health), Ashlee Jontz(Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix), Brenda Downs(Creative Commons), Lori Ann Cox(Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center), Sheila Alexander(University of Pittsburgh), Katherine Harrison(Phoenix Children's Hospital), Robert E. MacLaren(University of Montana)
Critical Care Medicine
February 26, 2025
Cited by 6

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship among ICU patient-to-pharmacist ratio, perceived quality of patient care, and pharmacist burnout. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, time-motion study conducted over a 10-month period (from May 1, 2022, to February 28, 2023). SETTING: Adult ICU, PICU, or neonatal ICU. SUBJECTS: ICU clinical pharmacists. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 128 ICU pharmacists completed 703 unique time-motion observation days and recorded their time associated with direct/indirect patient care activities, Maslach Burnout Inventor survey scores, and perceived quality of patient care provided (5-point Likert scale). Total pharmacist time on direct and indirect patient care activities were 5.9 ± 1.9 and 3.3 ± 1.7 hours per shift, respectively. The number of assigned patients in the ICU and overall (ICU and non-ICU) per shift was 19.3 ± 12.9 and 23.4 ± 17.9, respectively. The overall frequency of pharmacist burnout was 38.1%. Burnout was associated with incremental increases in the number of assigned total patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05) and overtime worked (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35). Higher compared with lower perceived quality of patient care was associated with significantly smaller assigned ICU patients (17.0 ± 7.4 vs. 30.6 ± 23.8, respectively; p < 0.001). Additional direct patient care time allocated per patient was predictive of a high quality of care perception (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.03-2.05). Burnout was inversely associated with high quality of care (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96). The ICU patient-to-pharmacist ratio between 16:1 and 19:1 was associated with the highest perceived quality of patient care and comprehensive patient assessment completion rates. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care pharmacist practice models across healthcare institutions are inconsistent regarding patient assignments and time allocated toward direct and indirect patient care activities. The ICU patient-to-pharmacist ratio range between 16:1 and 19:1 may optimize quality of care and burnout risk at large academic institutions.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis