Artificial intelligence for individualized treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Isabel Deisenhofer(Deutsches Herzzentrum München), Jean-Paul Albenque(Clinique Pasteur), Sonia Busch(Medizin Campus Bodensee), Edouard Gitenay(Hôpital Saint Joseph), Stavros Mountantonakis(Northwell Health), Antoine Roux(Santé Publique France), Jérôme Horvilleur(Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier), Babé Bakouboula, Saumil R. Oza, Sélim Abbey(Hôpital privé du Confluent), Guillaume Théodore, Antoine Lepillier(Centre Cardiologique du Nord), Yves Guyomar(Hôpital Saint-Philibert), Francis Bessière(Lille’s Cardiology Hospital), Jaap Jan Smit(Isala), Théophile Mohr Durdez, Paola Milpied, Anthony Appetiti, Daniel Guerrero(Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital), Tom De Potter(Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy), Christian De Chillou(New York Hospital Queens), Seth Goldbarg(New York Hospital Queens), Atul Verma(McGill University Health Centre), John D. Hummel(The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center), TAILORED-AF Investigators(Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital), Jaap Jan Smit(Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy), Tom De Potter(Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital), Christian De Chillou(Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy)
Nature Medicine
February 14, 2025
Cited by 94Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become the cornerstone ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), the optimal ablation procedure for persistent and long-standing persistent AF remains elusive. Targeting spatio-temporal electrogram dispersion in a tailored procedure has been suggested as a potentially beneficial alternative to a conventional PVI-only procedure. In this multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, superiority trial, patients with drug-refractory persistent AF were randomly assigned to a tailored ablation procedure targeting areas of spatio-temporal dispersion, as detected by an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm, in addition to PVI (tailored arm, n = 187, 23% women) or to a conventional PVI-only procedure (anatomical arm, n = 183, 19% women). The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from documented AF with or without antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months after a single ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included freedom from any atrial arrhythmic events, and the secondary composite safety endpoint consisted of death, cerebrovascular events, or treatment-related serious adverse events. One year post-procedure, the trial met its primary efficacy endpoint, which was achieved in 88% of patients in the tailored arm compared with 70% of patients in the anatomical arm (log-rank P < 0.0001 for superiority). However, no significant difference between arms was observed for the freedom from any atrial arrhythmia endpoint after one ablation. The safety endpoint did not differ between arms, with procedure and ablation times being twice as long in the tailored arm. These results show that AI-guided ablation of spatio-temporal dispersion areas in addition to PVI is superior to PVI alone in eliminating AF at 1-year follow-up in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF. Ablation of subsequent organized atrial tachycardias may be needed to maintain sinus rhythm long term. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04702451 .


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis