Abstract TP295: Stroke Risk in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alessandra da Silva, Artur Menegaz de Almeida(Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso), Lucas Padilha(Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Maria Eduarda Maia de Souza(Universidade de Pernambuco), Michele Kreuz(Universidade Luterana do Brasil), Lilianne Rodrigues Fernandes, Mariana Rachas Reis(Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo), Francisco Cézar Aquino de Moraes(Universidade Federal do Pará), Francinny Alves Kelly(Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia)
Stroke
January 30, 2025
Cited by 0

Abstract

Background: It is suggested that survivors of different types of cancer may have an increased risk of stroke. Our study aims to evaluate cancer patients and non-cancer controls by analyzing stroke events in each group. Previous studies concluded that certain types of cancer increased stroke risk, however, their results had significant heterogeneity and statistical concerns. Methods: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until February 18th, 2024, assessing stroke in cancer survivor patients compared to the global population. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Review Manager 5.4 was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 18 studies were included, and stroke was reported in both cancer and non-cancer groups. Breast cancer (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.17; p=0.01; I 2 = 0%), Central Nervous System cancers (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.01-6.01; p=0.05; I 2 = 78%), cervical cancers (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.19-2.09; p=0.001; I 2 = 0%), head and neck cancers (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.07-1.68; p=0.01; I 2 = 59%), lung cancers (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.40-1.83; p<0.00001; I 2 =67%), multiple myeloma (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.32 -1.89; p<0.00001; I 2 = 49%), nasopharyngeal cancers (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.28-2.30; p=0.0003; I 2 = 85%), oesophageal cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07-1.65; p=0.009; I 2 = 0%), ovarian cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07-1.65; p=0.01; I 2 = 38%), pancreatic cancers (HR 2,70; 95% CI 2.34-3.11; p<0.00001; I 2 = 0%) and rectum cancers (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.01-1.63; p=0.04; I 2 = 0%) showed statistically significant differences between groups in favor of non-cancer controls. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, the stroke risk was increased in all cancers that reached statistical significance. Furthermore, our study brings relevant data to the body of literature concerning this long-term clinical uncertainty.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis