Time of CAR-T Failure Is a Strong Predictor of Outcome for Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Evgenii Shumilov(University Hospital Münster), Rebecca Wurm‐Kuczera(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Vladan Vučinić(Leipzig University), Maximilian Seib(University Hospital Münster), Udo Holtick(University of Cologne), Paolo Mazzeo(University of Göttingen), Julia Katharina Scholz(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Hristo Boyadzhiev(University of Bern), Thomas Melchardt(Paracelsus Medical University), Alexander Sebastian Hölscher(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Christian Schultze‐Florey(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Giuliano Filippini Velázquez(University Hospital Augsburg), Anna Ossami Saidy(Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch), Vadim Lesan(Saarland University), Ulf Schnetzke(Jena University Hospital), Andrea Kerkhoff(University Hospital Münster), Ulrike Bacher(University of Bern), Susanne Ghandili(Universität Hamburg), Enver Aydilek(University of Göttingen), Niklas Gebauer(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Thomas Weber(Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg), Gerald Wulf(University of Göttingen), Bertram Glass(Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch), Lorenz Thurner(Saarland University), Florian H. Heidel(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Christoph Schmid(University Hospital Augsburg), Andreas Viardot(University Hospital Ulm), Mathias Hänel(Klinikum Chemnitz), Sascha Dietrich(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Thomas Pabst(University of Bern), Francis Ayuk(Universität Hamburg), Bastian von Tresckow(Essen University Hospital), Bjoern Chapuy(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Christiane Pott(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Fabian Mueller(Universitätsklinikum Erlangen), Georg Lenz(University Hospital Münster)
Blood
November 5, 2024
Cited by 5Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Introduction Patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy are challenging to treat. CD20xCD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for these pts. In the pivotal trials, glofitamab and epcoritamab demonstrated notable efficacy, with an overall response rate (ORR) of at least 50% and a complete response rate (CR) of at least 34% after CAR-T cell therapy. However, data on the efficacy and safety of BsAbs post-CAR-Ts in the real-world setting are scarce. Methods To assess the efficacy and feasibility of BsAbs in the post CAR-T population, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, multinational analysis, enrolling 85 pts with r/r LBCL treated with BsAbs across 20 centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Pts were eligible for the study if they had experienced CAR-T cell failure. We defined early ((within first 3 months (mo)), intermediate (4-6 mo) and late (>6 mo) CAR-T cell failure and assessed efficacy (ORR, CR, PR, mPFS, mOS) and feasibility of BsAbs in the real-world setting depending on these time points. Furthermore, information on treatment between CAR-T and following BsAb was collected. Results The study cohort included de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBLC) (55/85), transformed indolent lymphoma (18/85), high grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) ((10/85; MYC & BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements (5/10); not otherwise specified (NOS) (4/10); or 11q deletion (1/10)), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) (1/85) and T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (TCRLBCL) (1/85). Before receiving BsAbs, 43 (51%) pts presented with early (mo 1-3), 24 (28%) with intermediate (mo 4-6), and 18 (21%) pts with late (>6 mo) relapse post-CAR-Ts. Moreover, 51 out of 85 pts (60%) received BsAbs directly after CAR-T failure (immediate BsAb group), while 34 (40%) had a median of one therapy (range 1-4) prior to BsAbs (non-immediate BsAb group). Glofitamab (75/85) was the most commonly administered BsAb followed by epcoritamab (9/85) and mosunetuzumab (1/85). Overall, 42% of pts responded to BsAbs, with 23% achieving CR and 19% partial response (PR). The ORR varied based on the timing of BsAbs application (47% immediate vs. 35% non-immediate, p=0.282) and CAR-T cell failure (30% vs. 50% vs. 61% in early, intermediate and late relapse post-CAR-Ts, p=0.019). The highest CR rate was observed in pts with late CAR-T failure (44%), followed by intermediate (25%) and early (14%) groups (p=0.037). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.27 mo, while the median overall survival (mOS) was 6.83 mo. Estimated mPFS was significantly better in the immediate than in the non-immediate BsAb group (4.37 mo vs. 2.48 mo, p=0.026) while mOS did not differ significantly (7.73 mo vs 5.10 mo, p=0.100). Additionally, mPFS and mOS differed significantly in early (2.13 and 4.10 mo), intermediate (3.73 and 7.73 mo) and late (10.46 mo and not reached) CAR-T failure groups, accordingly (p≤0.004). In the multivariate analysis, sensitivity to the last treatment prior BsAbs (PFS - [HR=2.31, p=0.004]; OS - [HR=2.81, p=0.006]), the timepoint of CAR-T failure (PFS - [HR=1.48, p=0.05]; OS - [HR=1.94, p=0.011]), additional therapies between CAR-T and BsAb (PFS - [HR=1.86, p=0.039]) and LDH levels before application of BsAb considered as continuous variable (p=0.049 for PFS) were the strongest predictors of survival after initiation of BsAbs. The frequency of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 31%, with grades 3-4 documented in 3%. Severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred only in one patient (1%) (grade 3). Infections were documented in 36% of pts, with grades 3 in 11% and three pts with grade 5 (all associated with COVID-19). Conclusions In summary, BsAbs show efficacy and manageable safety profiles in r/r LBCL pts following CAR-T failure in real-world settings. However, efficacy of BsAb is significantly impaired in early CAR-T refractory pts underscoring the necessity of novel therapeutic approaches in these pts.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis